Table 11 Comparison analysis with existing methods.
Method | Ranking stability | Accuracy | Flexibility | Ease of parameter-setting | Ease of implementation | Overall practicality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposed method | High | High | High | High | High | High |
CrIF-MOORA | Medium | Medium | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
CrIF-TOPSIS | High | High | Medium | Medium | High | High |
CrIF-VIKOR | Medium | High | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
CrIF-EDAS | Medium | Medium | Medium | High | High | Medium |
CrIF-PROMETHEE | High | High | High | Low | Low | Medium |
