Table 1 Literature work on predicting crash severity with the use of ML algorithms.

From: An interpretable dynamic ensemble selection multiclass imbalance approach with ensemble imbalance learning for predicting road crash injury severity

References

Nature of the Problem

Classification/ Severity Levels

Class Imbalance countermeasures

Approaches Utilized

(Optimal model)

Aboulola O34

Improving traffic accident severity prediction

Fatal, Serious,

Minor,

No-Injury

Not

MLP, CNN, LSTM, ResNet, MobileNet,

(MobileNet)

Ren et al.31

Traffic safety assessment, undivided 2-way highway rail grade crossings

Uninjured,

Injured,

Killed

Not

XGBoost with SHAP

Shao et al.35

Injury severity prediction in automotive crashes using natural language processing

Minor, moderate, Major, Catastrophic,

Not,

XGBoost, LGBM, Cat Boost, RF, SVM, NLP, (XGBoost-NLP)

Chen et al.20

Improving crash severity with imbalanced data

Fatal

Non-fatal

Yes, SMOTE-NC,

RUS, GAN

Binary logit with GAN-RU

Sattar et al.2

Road crash injury severity prediction

Non-Sever

Severe

Not

GNN, RF, XGBoost, ANN (GNN)

Li et al.10

Crash injury severity prediction considering data imbalance

No injury, Possible Inj., Non-incap. Inj., Incap. Inj., Fatal

Yes, RUS, ROS, SMOTE, ADASYN and WGAN-GP

LR, MLP, RF, AdaBoost, XGB,

(XGBoost with WGAN-GP)

Aziz et al.36

Road traffic Crash severity analysis using DES with IH and RoC

Non-Injury

Injury

Cost-sensitive learning with Class weights

DES with static ensemble methods,

(KNORAE-CatB)

Kou et al.11

Classification of autonomous vehicle crash severity by solving the problems of imbalance

Non injured

Injured

Yes, ROSE, SMOTE

RF, MI, XGBoost

(RF with SMOTE

Tahfim et al. 4

Imbalanced data of crashes Involving Trucks

Minor Injury

Major Injury

Yes, (ADASYN, Near Miss, SMOTE-Tomek, Under-sampling)

LR, RF, GBDT, MLP,

(GBDT with ADASYN)

Wang et al.21

Prediction of MV crashes severity based on random forest optimized by meta-heuristic algorithm

Minor impact, Moderate, impactful, significant Imp.

Yes, SMOTE

RF, BP. SVM, XGBoost,

(RF with metaheuristic)

Yang et al.38

Crash severity analysis with data enhanced with double layer stacking model

Severe

Minor

No Injury

Yes, ROS

Stacking LR, RF, KNN, GBDT, Cat Boost, GNB

(EnLKtreeGBDT)

Roudnitski18

Road crash severity prediction with balanced ensemble models

Non-casualty,

Minor, Moderate,

Serious, Fatal

Yes,

(SMOTE)

RF, XGB, AdaB, LGBM, CatB

Cheng et al.22

Crash severity prediction for road determinants based on a hybrid method

Minor, Moderate, Major

Yes, SMOTE

XGBoost, SVM, DT, MLP

(XGBoost-SMOTE)

Ogungbire et al.23

Effectiveness of Data Imbalance Treatment in Weather-Related Crash Severity Analysis

PDO, Moderate, Severe,

Yes, SMOTE-N, ADASYN-N,

XGBoost, RF

Aldhari et al.9

Severity prediction of highway crashes in Saudi Arabia

PDO, Injury

Death

Yes,

(Ran. over sampling)

RF, XGBoost, LR

(XGBoost)

Obasi et al.27

Forecasting the severity of road accidents

Serious

Non-Serious

Not

NB, RF, LR, ANN,

(RF and LR)

Ahmed et al.19

Road accident prediction and contributing factors

Fatal, Serious

Minor, No-Injury

Yes

(SMOTE)

DJ, RF, AdaB, CatB, XGB, LGBM, (RF)

Megnidio-Tchoukouegou et al.32

Road traffic accident improvements

Fatal,

Serious

Slight

Not

DT, XGBoost, Light GBM (DT)

Perez-Sala et al.15

Prevention of traffic accidents severity

Slight, Severe,

Fatal

Yes,

(Borderline SMOTE)

CNN, GNB, SVM, KNN (CNN)

Niyogisubizo et al.29

Predicting Crash Injury Severity in Smart Cities

Non-Serious

Serious

Not

KNN, XGB, AdaB, GB, (Wide & Deep L)

Asadi et al.24

Crash severity in work zone area

PDO

Injuries

Yes,

(SMOTE-ENN, SPE)

SPE, LGBM, AdaB, Cart, BLR (SPE)

Mohammadpour et al.16

Trucks involved in fatal accidents

KA (Fatal + Severe)

BC (Less severe)

O (PDO)

Yes,

(SMOTE)

RF, DT, KNN, MLP, GBDT, SVM,

(GBDT, RF)

Raja et al.8

Road traffic accident in

Oromia special zone

Slight,

Serious,

Fatal

Yes, SMOTE,

Ran. over sampling &

Under sampling

BPNN, FFNN, MLPNN, RNN, RBFNN, LSTM,

Vanishkorn et al.17

Crash severity classification prediction

No Injury,

Minor, Fatal

Yes

(SMOTE)

DT, RF, GB, LR, KNN

(GB with SHAP)

Islam et al.28

Predicting road crash severity and Crash hotspots

Fatal

Serious Injuries

Not

RF, XGBoost, LR

(RF)

Kim et al.12

Developing crash severity models handling class imbalance

PDO,

Injury, Fatal

Yes

(RUMC)

MNL, OLR, RF, ORF,

(Imbalanced ORF)

Sangare et al.14

Forecasting road accidents

No Injury,

Non-Incap. Injury,

Incap. Injury

Yes,

(SMOTE)

GMM, SVC

Chen et al.13

Mechanism of crashes with Autonomous Vehicles

Un-injured,

Injury Crashes

Yes,

(SMOTE)

SVM, CART, (XGBoost)

Fiorentini et al. 3

Handling imbalanced data in road crash severity prediction

Fatal + Injury

PDO

Yes

(RUMC)

DT, RF, KNN, LR

(RF with RUMC)

Wahab et al.33

Severity prediction of motorcycle crashes

Fatal, Hospitalized,

Injured, Damage

Not

MLP, PART, CART

(CART)

Chakraborty et al.37

Traffic crash injury severity

Fatal + Sev (KA),

Non-Sev + possible (BC), PDO (O),

Yes,

(SMOTE)

DT, RF, XGBoost, DNN

Liu et al.30

Intelligent Vehicle Crash Injury Severity

No Inj., Slight Inj., Serious Injury

Not

AdaBoost, GBDT, XGBoost

(CSSV-AGX)

  1. An Interpretable Dynamic Ensemble Selection Multiclass Imbalance Approach with Ensemble Imbalance Learning for Predicting Road Crash Injury Severity.