Table 2 Brain regions with significant FC differences within RSNs.

From: Aberrant brain network connectivity related to cognitive and emotional regulation in women with abdominal obesity

RSNs

Group comparison

HEM

Peak_region

Cluster size

MNI

Statistical value

X

Y

Z

DMN

AO > HC

Left

PCG.L

24

āˆ’ā€‰6

āˆ’ā€‰42

27

4.92

ANG.L

14

āˆ’ā€‰36

āˆ’ā€‰63

33

3.23

AO < HC

PCUN.L

20

āˆ’ā€‰18

āˆ’ā€‰60

33

4.96

āˆ’ā€‰18

āˆ’ā€‰57

24

4.46

Right

PCG.R

21

6

āˆ’ā€‰39

27

4.47

VAN

AO < HC

Left

IPL.L

19

āˆ’ā€‰60

āˆ’ā€‰54

39

5.05

āˆ’ā€‰63

āˆ’ā€‰54

39

3.53

Right

TPOmid.R

12

54

āˆ’ā€‰21

āˆ’ā€‰9

4.07

Left

IFGtriang.L

12

āˆ’ā€‰48

27

0

3.66

VN

AO < HC

CAL.L

14

āˆ’ā€‰18

āˆ’ā€‰81

6

4.86

  1. AO abdominal obesity; HC healthy control; DMN default mode network; VAN ventral attention network; VN visual network; PCG.L left posterior cingulate gyrus; ANG.L left angular gyrus; PCUN.L left precuneus; PCG.R right posterior cingulate gyrus; IPL.L left inferior parietal gyrus; TPOmid.R right temporal pole: middle temporal gyrus; IFGtriang.L left inferior frontal gyrus, triangular part; CAL.L left calcarine fissure and surrounding cortex; HEM hemisphere: MNI Montreal-Neurological-Institute.