Abstract
Cereals, as fundamental agricultural products, are a global food security concern. In Türkiye, cereals account for 50% of arable land, with wheat representing 67% of all cereal production. Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps (Puton) is the main pest of wheat and other cereals in Türkiye. This study was motivated by the need to understand regional variability in Sunn pest population parameters and their influence on pest management efficiency. We hypothesized that nymph density, parasitism rate, and feeding damage would show significant spatial differences, which could guide more targeted control strategies. This study was conducted between 2016 and 2022 in the southeastern provinces of Adıyaman, Batman, Diyarbakır, Mardin, Siirt, Şırnak and Şanlıurfa, where wheat production is intensive. Key parameters such as valuation survey area, egg parasitism rate, nymph survey area, average nymph density, management area, and suction rate were assessed. The relationships among these variables were analyzed using multivariate statistical techniques, including regression analysis and spatial clustering methods. Understanding key parameters such as valuation survey area, egg parasitism rate, nymph density, and management strategies is essential for mitigating the impacts of Sunn pest. The results showed substantial variation between provinces. For example, Adıyaman exhibited high nymph densities despite limited sampling coverage, while Mardin showed zero egg parasitism throughout the study period. A moderate positive correlation was observed between nymph density and parasitism rate, but no significant correlation was found with feeding damage. The study highlights that understanding these interrelated factors is essential for developing effective management strategies against Sunn pest. It also shows that the dynamics of these parameters can vary significantly between years and regions. Further research is recommended to better understand pest behavior and improve control strategies through region-specific approaches supported by statistical evaluations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cereals, regarded as fundamental agricultural products are considered a food security issue in the world and in our country. In Türkiye, cereals account for 50% of the 243 million decares of arable land, and wheat is in first place with a 67% share of cereal land1.
Pre-harvest diseases and cereal pests have a major impact on the technological quality and yield of wheat, as well as on the genetic characteristics of the variety and the growing conditions. One of the key threats to wheat yield and quality in Türkiye is a group of insect species commonly referred to as wheat bugs, including the sunn pest (Eurygaster integriceps), the cereal ground beetle (Zabrus tenebrioides), the Hessian fly (Mayetiola destructor), and the striped bug (Aelia rostrata), all of which are known to cause significant damage by reducing grain quality, yield, and seed viability2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.
Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae), is a major threat to wheat production in West and Central Asia and Eastern Europe11,12,13,14. They cause severe damage to crops by feeding on leaves, stems and grain. Sunn pest pierces plant tissue with its stylets and injects digestive enzymes through the salivary canal to liquefy the tissue into nutrient-rich slurry15,16.
The digestive damage caused by Eurygaster integriceps is primarily due to the proteolytic and amylolytic enzymes secreted during feeding. Using its stylet, the insect pierces the wheat grain and injects salivary secretions rich in enzymes such as trypsin-like proteases and α-amylases, which degrade gluten proteins and starch15,16. These enzymatic reactions lead to the breakdown of gluten structure, resulting in dough with poor elasticity and loaf volume, as well as undesirable baking characteristics such as rapid browning, weak texture, and off-flavor17,18,19. The enzymatic activity can be so severe that livestock reject the straw of infected plants20.
Proteolytic and amylolytic enzymes injected into wheat grains destroy the gluten and reduce the baking quality of the flour16,18,19,21. The resulting bread overcooks rapidly, fails to rise and often has an off-flavor. Advisers in Iran and Afghanistan reported that livestock refused to eat wheat straw after harvesting in fields with Sunn pest20. Sunn pest has been in the spotlight for many years because of the damage it causes to wheat in Türkiye, causing huge economic losses22,23,24. If the necessary control measures are not taken, Sunn pest (Eurygaster spp.) can cause product losses of up to 100% due to dry heart leaves damage (kurtbogazı), white spike damage (akbaşak) and suction damage in grain8.
Whereas in the 1950s the problem of Sunn pest was confined to the southeastern and southern Anatolian regions of Türkiye, today it threatens about 3/4 of the wheat production area. The reason why the Sunn pest degrades the technological quality of wheat is the digestive secretion with high proteolytic enzyme activity that this pest releases into the grain when it feeds by sucking on the wheat. This enzyme breaks down gluten proteins, causing a significant reduction in wheat quality3,25.
Globally, the management of Sunn pest primarily relies on integrated pest management (IPM) strategies that combine chemical, biological, and cultural control methods. In regions inside and outside of Türkiye, chemical insecticides are commonly used to manage E. integriceps populations, although their application is often limited by environmental and health concerns. Biological control agents, such as natural parasitoids and predators, are also being explored to reduce pest populations in an environmentally sustainable manner. Additionally, cultural practices like crop rotation, resistant wheat varieties, and early harvesting are promoted in several countries to limit the impact of Sunn pest on wheat production. Ongoing research focuses on improving these methods and developing more effective and sustainable pest control solutions.
Existing research on E. integriceps management highlights the importance of understanding its seasonal behavior and feeding patterns, which directly influence sampling and control strategies. For example, knowledge of its egg-laying and migration periods helps to determine the optimal times for pest sampling. In addition, integrated pest management (IPM) strategies that combine chemical, biological, and cultural methods, have been widely adopted. These methods, including the use of natural enemies and resistant wheat varieties, guided the approach used in this study, and ensured alignment with global pest management practices.
Based on this framework, the objectives of the study are threefold: (i) to assess spatial and temporal variation in Eurygaster integriceps population parameters (nymph density, egg parasitism rate, suction damage) across major wheat-producing provinces in Southeastern Türkiye; (ii) to investigate the statistical relationships among these parameters using regression and clustering analyses; and (iii) to derive practical implications for region-specific and data-supported pest management strategies.
With this study, some parameters (number of nymphs, egg parasitism rates, sucking rates, etc.) that are important for the management of the pest were determined in wheat growing areas in the Southeast Anatolia region of Türkiye between 2016 and 2021. These detected parameters were analyzed with advanced statistical programs and the interrelationships of some of these parameters, which are important in the management of the pest, were revealed.
Furthermore, although this study was conducted in Southeastern Türkiye, the findings have broader implications for global wheat production regions with similar dryland conditions. Understanding spatial variation in Sunn pest population dynamics and biological control potential can aid in the development of more efficient, region-specific pest management strategies worldwide, contributing to improved cereal production sustainability.
Materials and methods
The research material consists of wheat found in the study areas and adults, eggs and nymphs of Sunn pest, the most important pest of wheat. In addition, 1/4 m2 iron frames were used in the Sunn pest surveys.
Study area
The research was carried out in the provinces of Adıyaman, Batman, Diyarbakır, Mardin, Siirt, Şanlıurfa and Şırnak in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Türkiye, where Sunn pest management is carried out, grain cultivation is high and Sunn pest is a problem. This region is characterized by semi-arid climatic conditions, with average annual temperatures ranging between 15 and 20 °C and annual precipitation between 400 and 700 mm26. The topography of the region varies from plains to low-altitude plateaus (average elevation 500–900 m)27. Wheat cultivation in these areas typically follows traditional dry farming practices. Sowing is generally carried out between October and November, and harvesting occurs between June and early July. Common wheat varieties include ‘‘Gün 91’’, ‘‘Ceyhan 99’’, and ‘‘Zerahat’’, depending on the province. Fertilization is minimal, and most fields are rain fed, without supplemental irrigation application during the survey period. These cultivation patterns are consistent with dryland cereal production systems reported in the region28. Field surveys were conducted in wheat fields in these seven provinces between 2016 and 2022 (Fig. 1). In these agroecosystems, sustainable production systems are maintained. During the sampling periods, no herbicides, fungicides or insecticides were applied in the agroecosystems.
Location of the sampled ecosystems. Map created by the corresponding author using Paintmaps, an online map tool (https://paintmaps.com/map-charts/217/Turkey-map-chart, accessed July 2024).
Sampling of Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps
For the sampling of adults, eggs and nymphs, 1/4 m2 frames (0.5 m × 0.5 m = 1/4 m2) were used. In order to minimise the effect of the edges, the wheat field was first entered diagonally. This ¼ m2 frame was then randomly placed in the wheat field and the adults, nymphs and eggs that entered it were counted. In each wheat field, a minimum of 10 randomly placed ¼ m² frames were used to sample adult, egg, and nymph populations. The number of frames varied depending on field size but followed national survey standards (Table 1)29. Observations were conducted with a loupe (tarkim 30X) for egg parasitism assessment and grain suction damage evaluation. A handheld GPS device (Garmin eTrex 10) was used to record the coordinates of each sampling location. All data were manually logged on standardized field data sheets and later digitized for analysis. Sampling was repeated once weekly during critical pest stages.
Studies of valuation survey area (da)
This study was carried out to determine the density of overwintered adults (Fig. 2) in wheat fields after the descent of the pest from its wintering grounds has been largely completed. Depending on the temperature and rainfall conditions (Temperature and precipitation have a significant impact on the Sunn pest population. Warmer temperatures accelerate their life cycle and increase reproduction, while extreme heat can reduce survival. Precipitation affects habitat and food availability, with dry conditions typically reducing pest survival. These climatic factors are critical to predicting and managing sunn pest populations.) in the provinces, studies to determine the valuation survey area began in March. Wheat fields in the provinces were visited within 7–10 days. Surveys in all provinces were completed in March (e.g. Adıyaman and Diyarbakır provinces on 7–17 March, Mardin and Şanlıurfa provinces on 17–27 March). This was used to collect data for the nymph survey29.
Egg parasitism studies
The purpose of this survey is to determine the parasitism rates in that unit (wheat field). Egg parasitism studies were conducted in areas with an average density of overwintered adults per square meter of 0.8 and above, according to the valuation survey results. This study was started when 20–30% of the Sunn pest eggs had reached the anchor stage (Fig. 3a). To protect the parasitoids in the nature, eggs were marked and monitored in situ rather than collected from the units. General sampling was carried out in April, when adult females of Sunn pest were intensively laying eggs in wheat fields, and 10 egg packages were taken as a basis. Then, by counting the number of egg packages with and without parasites (Fig. 3b, c), the parasitism rate of the Sunn pest eggs was determined30. This stage was selected because parasitoid activity occurs primarily during the egg stage, and determining parasitism rates allows assessment of the effectiveness of natural biological control agents under field conditions.
Studies of nymph survey area (da)
In areas where valuation and parasitoid surveys had been completed, nymph surveys (within 10 days at the latest) were carried out to make the final decision before management. In the Sunn pest management, nymph (Fig. 4a, b,c) surveys were carried out by sampling method in all areas with a density of overwintered adults of 0.8 per m². Areas with 10 or more nymphs per m2 were included in the spraying programme as a result of nymph surveys. The management of the nymphs must be completed without delay8,29,30. Nymph surveys specifically targeted the 1st to 3rd instar stages, as national pest management guidelines recommend insecticide application only during these stages due to their higher susceptibility and lower mobility. Recording nymph stages is thus essential for determining the optimal timing for intervention.
Studies of average nymph density (m2)
First, the number of nymphs per m² was determined in the wheat fields where nymph surveys were carried out. These densities were then calculated for the province and average nymph density determined30.
Studies of management area (da)
The most important thing in the pest management of the Sunn pest is to use chemical control against the nymphs in the 1st − 3rd period (Fig. 4a, b,c). There is no treatment available for adult of Sunn pest. Once the nymph surveys were completed, wheat fields with a density of 10 or more nymphs per m² were identified and included in the spraying program30.
Studies of provincial suction rate (%)
The damage caused by the Sunn pest to the wheat grain can be seen by the black or brownish spot that it leaves on the grain. A white, mealy appearance begins to form around this point. This is the point at which the pest dips its proboscis into the wheat. It absorbs the essence of the wheat from the endosperm. This light-colored part is crushed when pressed with a fingernail (Fig. 5a, b).
While detecting suction grains, 10 separate samples, 100 each, were prepared to detect the sample from each wheat field. These samples were then examined (with or without suction) with the naked eye or with a magnifying glass, and the suction rate was determined on a field basis. These suction rates were then calculated for the province and provincial suction rate (%) determined30,31.
Data analysis
To visualize the valuation survey area (da), nymph survey area (da), management area (da), average nymph density (nymph/m²) and suction rate (%), the online program SankeyMATIC (https://sankeymatic.com/build/) was used to collect data. Regression and correlation analyses (SPSS 17.0 packaged software program) were used to determine whether there was a relationship between egg parasitism rate, nymph density and suction rate. In addition, heat map clustering (average nymph density, provincial suction rate) (SRplot: A free online platform for data visualization and graphing) and network graph (average nymph density, egg parasitism rate, provincial suction rate) (PAST 4.03 packaged software program) analyses were performed.
Results
In the provinces of Adıyaman, Diyarbakır, Mardin and Şanlıurfa, valuation and nymph surveys were carried out for Sunn pest, and then the management areas of these provinces were determined between 2016 and 2021. Over the years, including valuation, nymph, and management areas, ranged from 1,054,216 ha to 1,274,844 ha across most years, with a peak in 2021 at 1,351,732 ha. Diyarbakır had the highest cumulative survey and management area (2,588,753 ha), followed by Şanlıurfa (2,206,223 ha), Mardin (1,581,602 ha), and Adıyaman (883,514 ha). Specifically, valuation surveys were concentrated in Diyarbakır province (1,017,378 ha), nymph surveys in Şanlıurfa (897,044 ha) and management surveys in Diyarbakır (844,799 ha). A relationship was observed between the valuation survey area and both nymph and management areas, except in the case of Diyarbakır, where the relationship between nymph survey and management areas was partial (Fig. 6).
Average nymph densities (nymphs / m2) by year revealed the highest in 2019 (34.57), followed by 2017 (34.12), 2016 (33.75), 2021 (31.64), 2018 (31.40) and 2020 (30.09). Across the six-year period, Adıyaman exhibited the highest average nymph density (85.03), followed by Şanlıurfa (52.82), Diyarbakır (39.82) and Mardin (17.9). Yearly averages for Adıyaman ranged from 12.4 to 15.8 nymphs/m2 (Fig. 7).
Suction rates (%) were highest in 2021 (4.35), followed by 2019 (4.33), 2017 (3.71), 2016 (3.63), 2018 (3.54) and 2020 (3.39). Cumulative six-year suction rates were highest in in Şanlıurfa (9.10), followed by Adıyaman (6.13), Diyarbakır (5.86) and Mardin (1.86). Annual values showed highest density was found in the provinces of Şanlıurfa (1.36 in 2016, 1.72 in 2017, 1.50 in 2018, 1.30 in 2019, 1.40 in 2020, and 1.82 in 2021) and Adıyaman (1.43 in 2019). The high rate of suction in these provinces is due to the high density of nymphs in these provinces (Fig. 8).
Heat map clustering analyses revealed temporal and spatial similarities in both nymph density and suction rates (Fig. 9). Heat map clustering clearly discriminated the dependent/independent variables by sorting them, with a color range (+ 1 to − 1; red to blue) indicating the values obtained. While the values in the red columns marked with + 1 were found to be the highest, the values in the blue columns marked with − 1 were found to be the lowest. The results of the heat map clustering showed that the years 2017 and 2020 with 2018; 2017, 2018 and 2020 with 2019; 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 with 2021; 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 with 2016 were similar in terms of the relationship between average nymph density and years. Looking at the relationship between average nymph density and province, Adıyaman and Mardin provinces, Diyarbakır and Şanlıurfa provinces were found to be similar (Fig. 9a). In terms of the relationship of suction rate by year, it was found that 2021 and 2020 were similar to 2017; 2017, 2020 and 2021 to 2018; 2017, 2018, 2020 and 2021 to 2016; 2016, 2017, 2018, 2020 and 2021 to 2019. Looking at the relationship between the suction rate and the province, the provinces of Mardin and Şanlıurfa, Adıyaman and Diyarbakır were found to be similar (Fig. 9b).
In 2021 and 2022, a positive spatial relationship was found between nymph densities among provinces: Adıyaman, Batman, and Siirt; Diyarbakır and Şanlıurfa; and Mardin and Şırnak (Fig. 10). For average egg parasitism rates (%), spatial correlations were observed between Adıyaman, Şanlıurfa, and Batman; and between Siirt, Şırnak, and Diyarbakır. No correlation was observed for Mardin (Fig. 11). Regarding suction rate relationships, positive spatial relationship existed between Adıyaman and Batman, and between Diyarbakır, Mardin, and Şanlıurfa; Siirt and Şırnak showed no significant relationship (Fig. 12).
Regression and correlation analyses (2021–2022 data) revealed a moderate positive (r = 0.50–0.69) correlation (r = 0.535*, p < 0.05) between average nymph density (nymphs/ m2) and average egg parasitism rates (%). No correlation was found between nymph density and suction rate (Table 2). A significant linear relationship (p < 0.05) was confirmed between nymph density and egg parasitism rates via regression analysis (Table 3; Fig. 13).
Discussion
A review of previous studies revealed that no comprehensive analysis had been conducted on the valuation survey area, egg parasitism rate, nymph survey area, average nymph density, management area and suction rate of Eurygaster integriceps. In this study, these parameters were evaluated using a combination of statistical software (SPSS 17.0, PAST 4.03) and online visualization tools (SankeyMATIC, SRplot) to determine relationships quickly, accurately, and visually.
Although previous studies are valuable, they were mostly limited in scope and detail. For example, Khubenov32 reported that parasitoids significantly limited Sunn pest populations in Bulgaria. Şimşek and Sezer33 observed a positive relationship between nymph density and parasitism rate in Hatay. Similarly, Memişoğlu and Özer34 demonstrated a direct correlation between Eurygaster maura eggs and Trissolcus spp. parasitism in Ankara. In our study, statistical analysis confirmed a moderate positive correlation between nymph density (nymphs/m2) and egg parasitism rate (%). This density-dependent parasitoid behavior has also been supported by international studies. For example, Fourouzan and Farrokh-Eslamlou35 demonstrated that inundative releases of Trissolcus grandis in Iran resulted in 60–90% egg parasitism, and CABI reports egg parasitism levels of 30–80% under favorable conditions. These findings suggest that as egg densities rise, natural enemies respond by increasing parasitism, contributing significantly to population regulation35,36.
This relationship (positive correlation between egg parasitism rates and nymph densities) suggests that effective parasitism directly reduces hatching success, thereby lowering nymph populations. It may also reflect a density-dependent dynamic where higher egg availability attracts more parasitoids. Conversely, no significant correlation was found between nymph density and suction rate. This may be due to additional variables such as plant growth stage, local microclimate conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity), plant resistance, or selective feeding behavior. Additionally, delayed damage expression or plant compensation might also obscure visual symptoms of pest feeding. This lack of correlation between suction rate and nymph density is consistent with previous studies, which found that suction sampling efficiency is highly affected by environmental factors such as wind speed and insect behavior37. Nymphs may also avoid detection by hiding under foliage or adhering to the soil surface, especially in dry or hot regions.
Explaining regional disparities in these parameters provides context for our findings. For instance, Adıyaman recorded the highest nymph density despite limited survey coverage—likely due to focused sampling in localized outbreak areas. Mardin, on the other hand, showed 0% parasitism throughout the study, possibly due to intensive pesticide use reducing parasitoid populations or the region’s dry climate limiting parasitoid survival. Similar regional disparities were documented by Islamoğlu38, who reported very low parasitoid presence (3–7%) in adult Sunn pests in Adıyaman, supporting our findings of limited biological control pressure in this region. In contrast, regions with climates that are more favorable or less pesticide use have shown significantly higher natural parasitism.
Beyond statistical correlations, spatial analytical tools such as heatmap clustering and regression models also offer practical insights for region-specific pest management. The heatmap clustering provided valuable insight into regional similarities in Sunn pest parameters. For example, the clustering of Diyarbakır and Şanlıurfa suggests similar pest population dynamics, likely due to shared agroecological conditions or wheat cultivation practices. Such use of heatmaps and regression analyses has become common in pest management research, aiding the identification of spatial patterns and guiding intervention timing. Recent UAV-based studies have employed similar correlation heatmaps to align pest populations with vegetation indices, enhancing monitoring precision39. This supports the idea that pest management strategies can be regionally coordinated in such provinces. Moreover, the regression analysis between nymph density and egg parasitism rates revealed a moderate positive relationship. This relationship suggests that nymph density data collected early in the season can help predict parasitism activity and inform decisions about whether biological control may be sufficient or if chemical treatments are needed. These findings demonstrate that integrating spatial and statistical analyses enhances targeted, data-driven pest management planning.
Several previous studies have evaluated feeding damage and pest impact in different ways. For example, Atlı40 proposed suction thresholds based on wheat protein content. Duman and Doğanlar41 found no significant correlation between Sunn pest density and suction rates, similar to our findings. Likewise, Gözüaçık et al.42 and Dizlek and İslamoğlu31 examined yield losses and methodological differences in assessing suction damage. In our study, no statistical relationship was found between nymph density and suction rate. Koçak et al.43 emphasized the need for close monitoring of Eurygaster integriceps, which was found to be more damaging and widespread than other species in cereal fields. Mutlu et al.44 also reported substantial yield losses linked to overwintered and new generation pests. Our findings further revealed a positive correlation between the valuation survey area, nymph survey area, and management areas, supporting the need for integrated and localized pest management strategies.
To enhance Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies, combining biological control with spatial modeling is recommended. Aljaryian et al.45 used CLIMEX models to forecast Sunn pest distribution under climate change scenarios, emphasizing proactive planning. Likewise, IPM programs can benefit from incorporating parasitoid release programs or conservation of native enemies, particularly in areas with proven natural control potential.
Although the scope of this study is geographically limited to Southeastern Türkiye, its implications extend far beyond this region. Dryland wheat production systems similar to those studied here are prevalent across Central and Western Asia, North Africa, and parts of Eastern Europe, where Eurygaster integriceps remains a key pest. The analytical framework presented—combining spatial clustering, regression modeling, and multivariate analysis—provides a transferable methodology for pest population assessment and decision-making in IPM programs. Moreover, this study demonstrates how fine-scale spatial and temporal data can inform region-specific interventions, offering a model that can be adapted in similar agroecological contexts. Therefore, our findings not only improve local pest management practices but also contribute broadly to the advancement of data-driven IPM strategies under variable environmental conditions.
Conclusions
Understanding and knowing the valuation survey area, egg parasitism rate, nymph survey area, average nymph density, management area and sucking rate of Sunn pest that important pest is the first step in implementing appropriate measures to management their negative impacts. This study has shown that the relationship between the above-mentioned data is important to manage of the pest. In addition, the relationships between these values may vary from one year to another and from one province to another.
As a result of this study, the following conclusions have been drawn:
-
The average parasitism rate in 2021–2022 was found to be highest in Adıyaman (13.45% and 14.72%) and lowest in Diyarbakır (1.50%) and Mardin (0%).
-
It was found that the average nymph density (nymphs/m²) in 2021–2022 was highest in Batman province (14.30 and 9.79 nymphs/m²) and lowest in Diyarbakır (5.83 and 7.88 nymphs/m²) and Mardin (6.30 and 2.08 nymphs/m²) provinces respectively.
-
It was found that there is a linear relationship between the number of nymphs per square meter in wheat fields and the number of parasitized eggs, i.e. as the number of nymphs increases, so does the rate of parasitism.
-
It has been found that as the number of nymphs hatching from eggs laid by adult Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps adult increases, and so do suction rates, but there is no statistical relationship between the two.
Based on these findings, several practical recommendations for Sunn pest management can be made. In provinces such as Adıyaman, where both nymph density and egg parasitism rates are relatively high, biological control strategies—including the conservation or augmentation of natural enemies—should be prioritized. Conversely, provinces such as Mardin and Diyarbakır, where parasitism rates are low despite the presence of nymph populations, require enhanced monitoring and consideration of integrated pest management (IPM) practices. These suggestions are supported by the observed linear relationship between nymph density and parasitism rate and can help guide region-specific control strategies.
Although the current study was regionally focused, the methodological framework and key findings have relevance beyond Türkiye. Similar dryland agroecosystems across Asia, the Middle East, and parts of Europe face comparable pest management challenges. Therefore, spatially informed monitoring and control approaches, as exemplified here, can be adapted to other regions to enhance integrated pest management efficiency.
In the future, much more research on the pest is needed to understand the damage and management of the main wheat pest, Sunn pest, and to identify new strategies, as well as statistical evaluations to prove their scientific accuracy.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Gökdoğan, A. Historical development of Sunn pest management in Turkey. Four Elem. 4(7), 33–46 (2015).
Lodos, N. Studies on the Sunn pest (Eurygaster integriceps Put.) problem in Türkiye, Iraq, Iran and Syria 51, 115 (Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, Ege University Press, İzmir, Türkiye, 1961).
Atlı, A., Köksel, H. & Dağ, A. Influence and determination of Sunn pest on bread making wheat quality. in International Symposium on Sun pests. Proceedings 13–17 June 1988 1–19 (Tekirdağ, Türkiye, 1988).
Atlı, A. et al. Effects of damaged grains of Eurygaster spp. and Aelia spp. On the quality of bread wheat. Directorate of Field Crops Central Research Institute. General Publication No: 1988/2 23 (Agricultural Printing House, Ankara, Türkiye, 988b).
Sivri, D. Isolation, characterisation, purification of Sunn pest proteolytic enzymes and determination of their effects on gluten proteins. Doctoral thesis (Hacettepe University, Department of Food Technology, Ankara, Türkiye 1998).
Anonymous. Important Diseases and Pests of Cereals. T.R. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Directorate General of Protection and Control 25 (Ankara, 2005).
Karaca, V., Gözüaçık, C. & Şimşek, Z. Entomological problems of cereals in southeastern Anatolia and their solutions. Turk. J. Sci. Rev. 5(2), 154–159 (2012).
Özkan, M. & Babaroğlu, N. E. Sunn Pest. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock 208 (Directorate General for Food and Control Publications, Ankara, 2015).
Tarla, Ş. & Doğanlar, M. Egg parasitoids of Sunn pest in Hatay and its surroundings, their alternative hosts, the pentatomid species, and their host plants. Proceedings of the 4th Turkish Congress on Biological Control, 26–29 January 1999, Adana, Türkiye, 97–106 (1999).
Güllü, M., Gözüaçık, C. & Konuksal, A. Wheat Insect Pests. in Advances in Wheat Breeding towards Climate Resilience and Nutrient Security (eds Zencirci, N., Altay, F., Baloch, F. S., Nadeem, M. A., Ludidi, N. 1st edn 391–451 (Springer, Singapore, 2024).
Brown, E. S. Research on the ecology and biology of Euygaster integticeps put. (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) in middle East countries, with special reference to the overwintering period. Bull. Entomol. Res. 53, 445–514 (1962).
Critchley, B. R. Literature review of Sunn pest Eurygaster integriceps Put. (Hemiptera, Scutelleridae). Crop Prot. 4, 271–287 (1998).
Parker, B. L., Costa, S. D. & Skinner, M. Sampling Sunn pest (Eurygaster integriceps Puton) in overwintering sites in Northern Syria. Turk. J. Agric. For. 26, 109–117 (2002).
Trissi, N. et al. Effect of egg parasitoid density on the population suppression of Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae), and its resulting impact on bread wheat grain quality. J. Pest Sci. 79, 83–87 (2006).
Hosseininaveh, V., Bandani, A. & Hosseininaveh, F. Digestive proteolytic activity in the Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps. J. Insect Sci. 9(70), 1–11 (2009).
Mehrabadi, M., Bandani, A. R., Saadati, F. & Ravan, S. Sun pest, Eurygaster integriceps puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae), digestive α-amylase, α-glucosidase and β-glucosidae. J. Asia-Pac Entomol. 12, 79–83 (2009).
ICARDA CARAVAN Saving Our Daily Bread from the Sunn pest. ICARDA (International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas) Carav 12, 13–14 (2000).
Hariri, G., Williams, P. C. & El-Haramein, F. J. Influence of pentatomoid insects on the physical dough properties and two-layered flat bread baking quality of Syrian wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 31, 111–118 (2000).
Allahyari, M., Bandani, A. R. & Habibi-Rezaei, M. Subcellular fraction of midgut cells of the Sunn pest Eurygaster integriceps (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae): Enzyme markers of microvillar and perimicrovillar membranes. J. Insect Physiol. 56, 710–717 (2010).
Parker, B. L., Amir-Maafi, M., Skinner, M. & Kim, J. S. Distribution of Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae), in overwintering sites. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 14, 83–88 (2011).
Radjabi, G. H. Ecology of Cereal Sunn Pest in Iran (Publications of Agricultural Research and Education Organization, Tehran, 2000).
Rashwani, A. & Cardona, C. Effect of Sunn bug (Eurygaster integriceps Puton) damage on the yields of hammari and gezira-17 durum wheats. Rachis 3 (1), 1–21 (1984).
Ünal, S. S. Cereal Technology 216 (Ege University Faculty of Engineering, Reproduction Publication No: 29, İzmir, Türkiye, 1991).
Şimşek, Z. et al. Disease factors and control strategies for Sunn pest, an important cereal pest in turkey, and root and crown rot in cereals. IV. GAP Agriculture CongressProceedings (1), 323–329 (Şanlıurfa, Türkiye, 2005).
Lorenz, K. & Meredith, P. Insect damaged wheat: Effects on starch characteristics. Starch/Staerke 40(4), 136–139 (1988).
Turkish State Meteorological Service. Regional climate statistics. (2023). https://mgm.gov.tr.
Karagöz, A. Wheat landraces of Turkey. Emir J. Food Agric. 26(2), 149–156 (2014).
FAO. Cereal Crop Cultivation Technologies in Drylands of the Middle East (FAO Technical Bulletin No. 74) (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations database, 2020). https://www.fao.org.
Anonymous Wheat Integrated Management Technical Instruction 142 (Publications of General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies, 2011).
Anonymous Technical Instructions for Pest Management Vol. 1, 283 (Publications of General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies, Ankara, 2008).
Dizlek, H. & İslamoğlu, M. Comparison of the methods used in our country for the determination of the sucking rate of the Sunn pests in the mass of wheat. J. Agric. Fac. Uludag Univ. 24(1), 81–90 (2010).
Khubenov, Z. K. Study on the role some species of the family Tachinidae (Diptera) in the limiting the abundance of harmful Bugs of the genus Eurygaster (Heteroptera: Scutelleridae) abs. Rev. Appl. Entomol. 71 (8), 644 (1983).
Şimşek, Z. & Sezer, A. C. Preliminary studies on the egg and nymph population and the damage caused by Sunn pest on wheat in the province of Hatay. Plant. Prot. Bull. 25(1–2), 30–48 (1985).
Memişoğlu, H. & Özer, M. Natural enemies and activities of European Sunn pest, Eurygaster maura L., (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) in Ankara province. 3rd Turkish Biological Control Congress, 25–28 January 1994, (Izmir, Türkiye 1994).
Fourouzan, R. & Farrokh-Eslamlou, M. A. Bio-control of Eurygaster integriceps (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) using its egg parasitoid, Trissolcus grandis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) in wheat fields of West azarbaijan, Iran. J. Sci. 2(3), 149–152 (2018).
CABI. Eurygaster integriceps (Sunn pest). CABI PlantwisePlus Knowledge Bank. https://doi.org/10.1079/PWKB.Species.23512#sec-3 (2021).
Banks, C. J. & Brown, W. L. A comparison of methods of estimating population density of adult Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps Put. (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) in wheat fields. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 5(4), 255–260 (1962).
Islamoğlu, M. Adult parasitoid species of Sunn pest, Eurygaster spp. (Heteroptera; Scutelleridae) of parasitization rates in Adıyaman. Eur. J. Sci. Technol. 31(Supp. 1), 634–639 (2021).
Deng, L. et al. UAV-based multispectral remote sensing for precision agriculture: A comparison between different cameras. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 146, 124–136 (2018).
Atlı, A. Report on the quality studies carried out on samples taken following the complaint of Sunn pest suction in wheat in the region of Thrace. Technical Report, 19 (1987).
Duman, M. & Doğanlar, O. Comparison of damage levels and determination of parasitism rates of Sunn pest (Eurygaster integriceps Put.) in barley, lentil and wheat fields adjacent to pastures in Diyarbakır Province. Proceedings of the National Cereals Symposium131 (Konya, Türkiye, 2008).
Gözüaçık, C., Mutlu, Ç., Karaca, V. & Duman, M. Effects of different rates of Sunn pest (Eurygaster integrıceps Put. (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) damage on wheat grain yield and some physiological traits. in Proceedings of the 6th GAP Agriculture Congress, 458–462 9–12 May 2011 (Şanlıurfa, Türkiye, 2011).
Koçak, E., Çetin, G. & Hantaş, C. Sunn pest, Eurygaster spp. (Heteroptera: Scutelleridae) species and control status in the grain fields of Southern Marmara provinces. J. Agric. Fac. Uludag Univ. 21(1), 43–50 (2007).
Mutlu, Ç. et al. Revision of the economic damage threshold of Sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps put. (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) in the Southeast Anatolian region. Bull. Turk. Entomol. 4 (3), 157–169 (2014).
Aljaryian, R., Kumar, L. & Taylor, S. Modelling the current and potential future distributions of the Sunn pest Eurygaster integriceps (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) using CLIMEX. Pest Manag Sci. 72(10), 1989–2000 (2016).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the personals of the Plant Production and Plant Health Branch Directorates of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in the provinces of Adıyaman, Batman, Diyarbakır, Mardin, Siirt, Şanlıurfa and Şırnak for their assistance in this study.
Funding
Any sources of funding don’t have for the research reported. This study has been funded by authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors confirm their contribution to the paper as follows: M.D. conceptualization; investigation; methodology. İ.A. conceptualization; formal analysis; writing—original draft.All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
We confirm that this study is an original and has not been published elsewhere, nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere. All authors have approved the manuscript and agree with its submission to Scientific Reports.
Consent for publication
Our manuscript don’t contain any individual person’s data in any form (including individual details, images or videos), consent to publish. “Not applicable”. We give approval all presentations of case reports.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Duman, M., Alaserhat, İ. Assessment of Eurygaster integriceps parameters to improve integrated pest management in Southeastern Türkiye wheat fields. Sci Rep 15, 26031 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10340-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10340-3