Table 10 Proposed model comparisons with other state-of-the-art air quality forecasting models.

From: Advanced air quality prediction using multimodal data and dynamic modeling techniques

Reference

Method

Accuracy

RMSE

MAE

R2

Key Features

Proposed hybrid model

CNN + BiLSTM + Attention + GNN + Neural-ODE

98.8%

6.21

3.89

0.988

Combining CNNs, BiLSTM, attention mechanisms, GNNs, and Neural-ODEs to handle spatial and temporal features

Ahmed et al.1

Deep Learning for AQI Forecasting with Satellite-derived Data

90.32%

7.10

4.30

0.96

Uses hydro-climatological data along with deep learning for AQI forecasting

Rabie et al.2

CNN-BiLSTM Hybrid for Air Quality Prediction

92.73%

8.05

4.20

0.94

Utilises CNN and BiLSTM hybrid for spatially resolved AQI prediction in megacities

Kumar & Kumar3

Multi-view Stacked CNN-BiLSTM for PM2.5 Prediction

91.62%

7.80

4.50

0.95

Stacked CNN-BiLSTM approach to predict PM2.5 concentrations in urban environments

Putri & Caraka (2024)

Fine-tuning CNN-LSTM for PM2.5 Nowcasting

92.72%

7.65

4.35

0.95

Focuses on fine-tuning CNN-LSTM models for short-term PM2.5 predictions

Barthwal & Goel4

DCNN + LSTM for AQI Time-series Classification

90.16%

8.10

4.55

0.93

Integration of DCNN and LSTM for AQI time-series classification

Wu et al.5

DVMD Informer-CNN-LSTM Optimized with Dung Beetle Algorithm

91.82%

7.00

4.00

0.96

Optimised with the Dung Beetle Algorithm for enhanced AQI forecasting performance

Prado-Rujas & García-Dopico6

Spatio-Temporal Air Quality Forecasting Framework

93.22%

8.20

4.60

0.92

Multi-variable, sensor-agnostic framework for spatio-temporal air quality forecasting

Liu et al.7

Air Quality Class Prediction using ML

91.29%

8.40

4.70

0.91

Uses machine learning for air quality classification based on monitoring and secondary data

Wang et al.8

Spatio-Temporal Model Integrating Graph Convolution

93.08%

6.80

4.10

0.97

Combines graph convolution with multi-head attention mechanisms for improved air quality forecasting