Table 4 Performance comparison for different models on the independent testing dataset.
From: Prediction of loess collapsibility coefficient using bayesian optimized random forest model
Moisture (%) | Dry Density (g/cm3) | Pressure (kPa) | True | Prediction | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 | 1.28 | 200 | 0.104 | 0.120 | 15.1 |
10 | 1.29 | 200 | 0.088 | 0.100 | 13.5 |
13 | 1.3 | 200 | 0.075 | 0.090 | 20.4 |
11 | 1.32 | 200 | 0.077 | 0.089 | 15.2 |
12 | 1.32 | 200 | 0.074 | 0.089 | 19.9 |
14 | 1.31 | 200 | 0.082 | 0.102 | 23.9 |
16 | 1.33 | 200 | 0.085 | 0.101 | 19.1 |
17 | 1.37 | 200 | 0.075 | 0.083 | 11.0 |
17 | 1.38 | 200 | 0.06 | 0.073 | 22.0 |
22 | 1.38 | 200 | 0.035 | 0.036 | 1.8 |
