Table 2 The outcomes of the Bayesian ANCOVA (i.e., bayesian model comparison—all models) on the standard responses (i.e., stimuli presented at 6 Hz).

From: Numerical format integration in primary school children examined with frequency-tagged electroencephalography

Models

P(M)

P(M|data)

BFM

BF10

Error%

Null model (incl. subject and random slopes)

0.03

5.65 × 10− 14

2.09 × 10− 12

1.00

 

Notation + ROI + Notation*ROI

0.03

0.44

29.51

7.85 × 1012

4.12

Notation + ROI + Age + Notation*ROI

0.03

0.22

10.32

3.86 × 1012

4.21

Notation + ROI

0.03

0.09

3.62

1.58 × 1012

3.34

Notation + Condition + ROI + Notation*ROI

0.03

0.08

3.32

1.46 × 1012

3.73

Notation + Condition + ROI + Age + Notation*ROI

0.03

0.05

1.78

8.15 × 1011

8.71

Notation + ROI + Age

0.03

0.04

1.60

7.34 × 1011

4.13

Notation + Condition + ROI + Notation*Condition + Notation*ROI

0.03

0.02

0.70

3.28 × 1011

4.80

Notation + Condition + ROI

0.03

0.02

0.62

2.92 × 1011

3.51

Notation + Condition + ROI + Notation*ROI + Condition*ROI

0.03

9.35 × 10− 3

0.35

1.66 × 1011

4.22

  1. All models include subject and random slopes for the repeated measures. Only the first ten models out of 38 are depicted.
Back to article page