Table 8 Comparison result of cylinder GHT-Bézier developable surfaces.
Algorithm | Optimal parameters | – | – | Developability degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
\(\lambda\) | \(\alpha\) | \(\beta\) | ||
BAT6 | \(-0.238\) | 0.531 | 0.899 | \(-10^{-1.98}\) |
PSO44 | 0.120 | \(-0.022\) | 0.232 | \(-10^{-2.06}\) |
MLO13 | 0.892 | 0.820 | 0.912 | \(-10^{-2.13}\) |
ANN-MFO45 | \(-0.443\) | \(-0.436\) | \(-0.669\) | \(-10^{-2.19}\) |
GWO7 | 0.472 | 0.842 | 0.002 | \(-10^{-2.27}\) |
ALO1 | 0.062 | 0.053 | 0.007 | \(-10^{-2.34}\) |
I-GWO (Proposed Method) | 0.940 | 0.020 | 0.006 | \(-10^{-2.41}\) |
