Table 9 Comparison result for geodesic interpolation curve developable surfaces.
Algorithm | Optimal parameters | – | – | Developability degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
\(\lambda\) | \(\alpha\) | \(\beta\) | ||
ALO44 | \(-0.817\) | 0.836 | 0.002 | \(-10^{-0.5}\) |
BAT6 | 0.302 | \(-0.831\) | 0.009 | \(-10^{-0.55}\) |
PSO13 | 0.344 | \(-0.532\) | 0.002 | \(-10^{-0.65}\) |
GWO1 | \(-0.825\) | 0.923 | 0.390 | \(-10^{-1.25}\) |
ANN-MFO7 | 0.928 | \(-0.941\) | \(-0.001\) | \(-10^{-1.3}\) |
MLO45 | 0.934 | \(-0.772\) | \(-0.006\) | \(-10^{-2.3}\) |
I-GWO (proposed method) | \(-0.489\) | 0.918 | 0.006 | \(-10^{-2.95}\) |
