Abstract
The Qinghai Plateau’s high-altitude conditions present significant challenges for wheat cultivation, demanding varieties with enhanced adaptability and stress resistance. However, the genetic basis for key traits like grain yield and stress tolerance in wheat adapted to these conditions remains poorly understood. This knowledge is crucial for developing wheat varieties that can thrive in the harsh environment of the Qinghai Plateau.This study aimed to uncover the genetic foundation of key traits by analyzing five F2 populations from crosses between Qinghai Plateau spring wheat varieties and CIMMYT germplasm. We used a target sequencing breeder chip to assess phenotypic variation in six parental lines. We identified potential genes for all-stage resistance (APR) and adult plant resistance (ASR) to stripe rust. Genotyping lines across the F2 populations revealed 99 loci/genes associated with ten key traits, with 35 showing genetic separation. Notably, the number of stripe rust resistance genes in the parental lines ranged from 4 to 9, with the F2 lines aggregating between 0 and 9 genes. Grain-related genes were aggregated in varying numbers, with the majority of lines carrying two genes. Gene frequency analysis revealed significant variation across populations, contributing valuable data for marker-assisted breeding and advancing wheat molecular breeding research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), a cornerstone of global food security, supplies essential dietary energy to about 40% of the global population1. Amid rapid global population growth and climate change challenges, wheat demand has reached unprecedented levels. By 2050, wheat production is projected to need a significant increase to meet escalating demand2,3. However, significantly improving wheat yield genetically faces challenges. Traditional breeding methods, limited by technology, struggle to make breakthroughs, and increasing environmental and biotic stresses severely challenge wheat productivity4. Fortunately, rapid advances in molecular biology and genomics have opened new avenues for wheat breeding, with molecular breeding emerging as a key approach for genetic enhancement. Recently, genomics and molecular biology have significantly aided in identifying genes and loci associated with phenotypic traits in wheat and its relatives. In wheat stripe rust resistance, 86 named resistance genes (Yr1-Yr86) have been identified across 21 chromosomes. Among them, 58 genes show adult plant resistance (APR), and the other 28 are all-stage resistance (ASR) genes5. Nine genes have been cloned to date, including Yr5, Yrsp, Yr7, Yr10, Yr15, Yr36, Yr18, YrU1, and Yr46. Four genes show pleiotropic resistance: Yr18/Lr34/Pm38/Sr57, Yr29/Lr46/Pm39/Sr58, Yr30/Lr27/Pmx/Sr2, and Yr46/Lr67/Pm46/Sr556. Research indicates that Yr5, Yr15, Yr32, and Yr76 alone are effective against the V26 (CYR34) pathogen population7. CIMMYT has significantly advanced the use of adult plant resistance, with about 60% of its materials possessing APR genes, especially Yr18/Lr34/Sr57/Pm38, now widely cultivated worldwide. Several resistance genes exhibit additive effects, and pyramiding of multiple adult plant resistance genes, like Yr18/Lr34/Sr57/Pm38, Yr29/Lr46/Sr58/Pm39, and Yr46/Lr67/Sr55/Pm46, has bred varieties with durable resistance to multiple diseases8,9. The durable multi-disease resistance genes Yr18, Yr29, Yr30, andYr46 show high susceptibility to stripe rust at the seedling stage, suggesting limited efficacy of individual genes. In China’s wheat resistance breeding, pyramiding multiple adult plant resistance genes significantly boosts durable resistance to stripe rust10. Scientists have identified and cloned several key genes controlling grain size and weight via comparative genomics. These include TaGW2, TaGS1a, TaTGW6, TaGS5-3 A, TaFlo2-A1, and TaTPP-6AL1. TaGW2 family members (TaGW2-6A, TaGW2-6B, and TaGW2-6D) differentially and additively affect grain weight and size. A particular TaGW2-6A haplotype is significantly linked to higher thousand-grain weight and width, effectively increasing grain weight in marker-assisted selection11. TaSus2-2B, a sucrose synthase gene in wheat, is primarily expressed during endosperm development and is closely associated with yield traits. This gene family is mapped to wheat chromosomes 2 A, 2B, and 2D12. CWI, a cell wall invertase and one of three invertases, is closely related to crop yield. This β-fructofuranosidase hydrolase enzyme catalyzes the irreversible conversion of sucrose to glucose and fructose, and the wheat gene TaCwi-A1 is associated with grain weight13. In wheat, transgenic expression of chloroplast glutamine synthetase (GS) increases nitrogen uptake and yield, with the GS family member TaGS5-AL also contributing14. Moreover, TaCwi-A1, TaGW2-6A, and TaTGW6-4 A are found in 49 major Qinghai wheat varieties, with materials carrying the top three haplotype combinations (TaCwi-A1a/Hap6A–A/TaTGW64Aa) showing the highest thousand-grain weight, marking them as the optimal gene combination for thousand-grain weight in Qinghai wheat15. The complexity of the wheat genome presents challenges for developing molecular markers and cloning genes. However, advances in whole-genome sequencing and the release of wheat and relatives’ genome sequences16,17,18,19 have aided fine mapping and cloning of adult plant resistance genes in wheat. In wheat genetic mapping, molecular marker use has expanded, with marker types increasing from initial RFLP markers20 to PCR-based RAPD21and SSR markers22,23. A series of SNP chips for wheat, including 660 K, 90 K, 55 K, 35 K, and 16 K, have been developed. These chips offer high throughput, low cost, time efficiency, and stable results, providing a scientific basis for rapidly and precisely selecting elite disease-resistant varieties in breeding. This accelerates the development of high-yield, high-quality wheat varieties, crucial for global wheat breeding24. In 2023, Northwest A&F University compiled wheat whole-genome data from 2000 to the present, encompassing chip data, QTL, MetaQTL, GWAS sites, and cloned functional genes, to create a wheat whole-genome gene/QTL database. Using data processing, transformation, and SNP screening with GenoBait technology, a wheat whole-genome disease resistance molecular breeding chip was developed, including the GBW16K molecular breeding background chip and the GBW0.1 K functional marker prospect selection chip. The GBW16K chip includes 14,868 SNP regions evenly spread across the wheat genome, while the functional marker chip covers 101 SNP regions for 60 major breeding targets with high heritability and gene typing reliability25. The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau’s unique ecology, marked by high altitude, low temperatures, diseases, and water scarcity, impedes agricultural technology development and adversely affects spring wheat cultivation, a key regional crop. There is an urgent need to develop spring wheat varieties that are high-yielding, high-quality, and resistant to multiple diseases, with durable resistance26. Over 50 years, the Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, has developed 26 new “Gaoyuan” and “Qingmai” varieties, characterized by large spikes, high yield, lodging resistance, and drought tolerance. For example, Gaoyuan 448, cultivated widely in Qinghai, is known for high yield, water efficiency, and lodging resistance and has long been the control variety in Qinghai’s regional wheat trials. However, continuous mutation of stripe rust pathogens in Qinghai has reduced Gaoyuan 448’s resistance, resulting in severe disease and yield loss. Thus, enhancing resistance genes to improve Gaoyuan 448’s resistance is crucial for regaining its high-yield traits and prolonging its lifespan. CIMMYT has led efforts to enhance wheat varieties’ yield potential and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses27. Studies indicate that CIMMYT-bred wheat lines can be directly cultivated on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau28as parental material to leverage their superior genetics for local variety improvement. In this study, we selected key Qinghai-Tibet Plateau spring wheat varieties—‘Abodanza (ABO)’, ‘Heshangtou (HST)’, ‘Gaoyuan 448 (GY448)’, Qingmai NO 1 (QM1)’, and ‘Qingchun 38 (QC38)’—as maternal donors, and MUCUY, a CIMMYT-introduced, high-resistant, and high-quality material from 2018, as the paternal donor. We created hybrid combinations and established F2 populations. this study eliminated paternal contribution noise and directly quantified maternal genetic effects on offspring traits by maintaining a constant paternal genome across five genetically diverse maternal populations. Using the GBW0.1 K functional marker chip, we analyzed the frequency of key genes in five F2 populations, characterized the genetics of resistance, grain, and dwarf genes in F2, uncovered genetic patterns of key traits, provided a theoretical basis for marker-assisted breeding, and supported wheat molecular breeding research with data.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
‘ABO,’ introduced to China in 1956, has become a key variety for promotion in the northwestern wheat regions. In addition to its direct use in cultivation, ‘ABO’ is a superior parent in wheat breeding in Qinghai, owing to its exceptional germplasm traits. Over the decades, numerous wheat varieties cultivated in Qinghai have inherited the ‘Abodanza’ germplasm lineage29. It is popular among Qinghai farmers and boasts excellent quality, robust drought resistance, consistent yields, and adaptability to extensive management practices. ‘HTS’, a high-quality local variety from Gansu’s arid regions, is renowned for its drought tolerance, adaptability to poor soils and salinity, deep sowing capabilities, and high-quality flour.‘Qing Chun 38’, developed by the Crops Institute of Qinghai Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, is a wheat variety resulting from a cross between Canadian red wheat and winter wheat 03702/W97208. In 2007, ‘Qing Chun 38’ yielded 466.5 kg/mu in Huangzhong County, Qinghai Province, marking an 11.1% increase over the control variety, ‘Gaoyuan 448’ spring wheat30. ‘GY448’, a predominant variety in Qinghai’s irrigated regions, was developed by the Northwest Plateau Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and has the pedigree ‘Qing Chun 533’/‘Plateau602’. The ‘Gaoyuan 448’ yield in Huangzhong, Qinghai, reached 6912 kg/ha in 2000, as reported by31. In 2007, ‘Gaoyuan 448’ yields in the Qaidam Basin of Qinghai varied from 9.75 to 10.50 t/ha under high water and fertilizer conditions and from 6.75 to 9.00 t/ha under average conditions. ‘Qing Mai NO1’, developed by the Northwest Plateau Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. In 2023, ‘Qing Mai NO 1’ was the control variety in Qinghai’s spring wheat regional trials, with yields ranging from 7080–12210 kg/ha across seven sites, averaging 8550 kg/ha. Mucuy (CIMMYT ID: 5663955), a result of “Mutus” selfed twice with “Akuri,” demonstrates high field resistance to yellow rust (YR) and leaf rust (LR) in multiple countries, including China, but shows moderate resistance under greenhouse conditions at the seedling stage. During the resistance gene mining of Mucuy, seven YR and four LR resistance loci were identified, including the known genes Yr29/Lr46 and a novel locus QYr.cim-3DS, all contributing to its durable rust resistance32. This study chose five predominant wheat varieties from Qinghai as maternal parents: ABO, HST, GY448, QM 1, and QC 38, and established corresponding genetic populations comprising 78 families from ABO×Mucuy (POP1), 74 families from HST×Mucuy (POP2), 47 families from QC 38×Mucuy (POP3), 214 families from GY448×Mucuy (POP4), and 278 families from QM1×Mucuy (POP5), totaling five F2 families. These parents and genetic populations were cultivated at the Haidong Ecological Agricultural Experimental Station, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, located in Haidong City (102°19′32″E, 36°28′60″N, Qinghai Province; the station sits in a typical transitional zone between the Loess Plateau and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, at 2016 meters above sea level, with an average annual temperature of 3.2 to 8.6°C, annual precipitation ranging from 319.2 to 531.9 mm, evaporation rates between 1275.6 to 1861 mm, average annual sunshine duration of 2708 to 3636 hours, and a frost-free period of approximately 90 days.
DNA extraction and a target sequencing breeder chip
Test material sampling was performed at the three-leaf stage, and leaf DNA was extracted using the CTAB method33,34. DNA quality control was conducted using a NanoDrop One instrument. We evaluated 101 functional genes associated with various traits, including 41 disease-resistance genes (e.g., QYr.nwafu-3BS, QYr.nwafu-4BL). KASP marker detection was performed according to the protocol by Rasheed et al. (GBW0.1 K), with the analysis conducted at Northwest A&F University.
Results
Phenotype in parents
Phenotypic variation analysis was conducted on six parents, focusing on stripe rust resistance (seedling and adult plant stages), field agronomic traits, and grain characteristics (Table 1). Assessments of stripe rust resistance at the seedling and adult plant stages indicated that ABO, QC38, and GY448 showed moderate resistance at the seedling stage but were highly susceptible at the adult plant stage, suggesting the presence of resistance genes that may be active throughout the growth period. In contrast, HST, QM1, and Mucuy exhibited high susceptibility at the seedling stage but resistance at the adult plant stage, indicating they may harbor genes that confer resistance during the adult plant phase. Mucuy had the highest tiller number among field agronomic traits, averaging 4.3 ± 0.58 (P > 0.05) tillers. QM1 had the most extended spike neck length, measuring 45.2 ± 1.5 (P > 0.05), while QC38 had the most extended spike length, at 14.2 ± 1.26 cm, P < 0.001). Gaoyuan 448 had the highest number of grains per spike, with 74.0 ± 5.19 (P < 0.001). Regarding plant height, Heshangtou was the tallest, at 142.8 ± 2.75 cm (P < 0.001), and Mucuy was the shortest, at 84 ± 6.6 cm (P < 0.001). Mucuy was the only parent with awns, while the others were awnless. QM1 had the largest average grain area, grain perimeter, average grain length and length-to-width ratio, measuring 20.34 ± 0.72 mm2 (P < 0.001), 18.26 ± 0.34 mm (P < 0.001), 6.77 ± 0.14 mm (P < 0.001) and 1.70 ± 0.04 (P < 0.001), respectively. GY448 had the largest width with 4.20 ± 0.43 mm2.
Genotype in parents
The markers, chromosomal information, and associated traits for all tested genes are presented in Table 2. Specifically, QYrsn.nwafu-2AS, QYrqin.nwafu-2BL and QYrsn.nwafu-3DL were detected exclusively in HST. In contrast, QYrqin.nwafu-2AL, QYr.nwafu-3BS, and QYrqin.nwafu-6BS were found in most wheat parents. Yr29 were detected in all parents. TaCwi-A1 was detected solely in QC 38, and Tasus2-2B was detected only in QM1. QYr.nwafu-3BS was detected in all Tibetan Plateau wheats except Mucuy. Yr17 and QFhb.caas-5AL were detected exclusively in Mucuy, with no segregation observed across all populations. HST harbored the most stripe rust resistance genes or loci, totaling 9. Gaoyuan 448 and Mucuy each had seven stripe rust resistance genes or loci. ABO and QM1 each possessed six stripe rust resistance genes or loci. In comparison, QC38 had the fewest stripe rust resistance genes or loci, with only four detected. Regarding genes associated with grain yield, QM1 showed the highest aggregation degree, including five genes. QC38 contained 4, ABO had 3, and GY448 and Mucuy had 2. However, no grain-related genes were detected in HST. Aside from QC38 detecting one gene for genes related to plant height, all other parents aggregated two dwarfing genes.
Genotype in five population
Stripe rust-resistant genes
All 16 stripe rust loci/genes detected in the population were identified. The distribution of the number of resistance genes across the Qinghai plateau wheat F2 families followed a normal distribution (Fig. 1). The maximum number of accumulated resistance genes was nine, with only eight families accumulating nine. The most common accumulation was five resistance genes in 237 families, accounting for 34.30%. A significant number of families accumulated six resistance genes, totaling 166 and representing 24.02% of the total. Families with seven and four resistance genes were similarly frequent, constituting 15.62% and 16.06% of the total, respectively. Families with three and eight resistance genes were comparably rare, comprising 5.78% and 4.34% of the total, respectively. No families had a single gene; five lacked any detected resistance gene loci.
Most detected gene loci are located on chromosome 1BL, including QYrsn.nwafu-1BL, Yr29, and QYrxn.nwafu-1BL (Fig. 2). QYrsn.nwafu-1BL showed segregation in POP2 with a gene frequency (refers to the proportion of a specific allele of a gene in a population) of 50.68%. QYrxn.nwafu-1BL showed segregation in POP1 and POP2 with gene frequencies of 55.13% and 45.27%, respectively. Yr29 with Gene frequencies in POP1, POP2, and POP3 were 54%, 47%, and 46.81%, respectively. Two genes are located on chromosome 2 A: QYrsn.nwafu-2AS and QYrqin.nwafu-2AL. QYrsn.nwafu-2AS showed segregation in POP1, POP2, and POP3 with gene frequencies of 50%, 47.97%, and 68.93%, respectively. QYrqin.nwafu-2AL showed segregation in POP2, POP4, and POP5 with gene frequencies of 50.67%, 49.77%, and 49.47%, respectively. The Yr17 gene was not detected in POP1, POP2, and POP3, but in POP4 and POP5, the gene frequencies were 53.74% and 49.10%, respectively. One gene detected on chromosome 2B is QYrqin.nwafu-2BL. QYrqin.nwafu-2BL showed segregation in POP1, POP2, and POP4, with gene frequencies ranging from 36.54 to 62.16%. Two genes are located on chromosome 3B: QYr.nwafu-3BS and Yr80. QYr.nwafu-3BS showed segregation in all populations, with gene frequencies ranging from 60.89 to 67.31%. Yr80 showed segregation in POP1, POP2, and POP4, with gene frequencies ranging from 20.51 to 32.43%. QYrsn.nwafu-3DL showed segregation in POP2 and POP4 with gene frequencies of 58.78% and 49.07%, respectively. Three genes are located on chromosome 6B: QYrsn.nwafu-6BS showed segregation in POP1, POP3, and POP4, with gene frequencies ranging from 39.36 to 57.94%. QYrqin.nwafu-6BS showed a gene frequency of 52.13% in POP3. Yr75, located on chromosome 7 A, showed gene frequencies ranging from 43.91 to 60.63% in all populations except POP1.
Grain size and yield trait-related genes
We tested six genes linked to grain weight and yield, locating them on chromosomes 2A, 2B, 3A, 6A, 6B, and 7A. In the Qinghai plateau wheat F2 families, the aggregation of grain-related genes was normally distributed (Fig. 1), with 36.03% of families aggregating two genes, the most common occurrence. Families aggregating one or three genes were similarly frequent, comprising 24.02% and 21.85% of the total, respectively. The maximum number of grain-related genes in a single family was five, representing just 2.75% of the total. Families lacking these genes made up 7.23% of the total. TaSus2-2B segregated in POP5 with a frequency of 48.03%; TaCwi-A1 segregated in POP3 with a frequency of 38.29%; Tabas1 segregated in POP2 and POP4 with frequencies of 49.32% and 50.70%, respectively; TaGS5-A1 segregated in POP1, POP3, and POP5 with frequencies ranging from 42.50 to 56.38%; TaGW2-6 A segregated in POP1, POP3, and POP5 with frequencies from 46.49 to 51.38%; TaT6P segregated in POP1 and POP2 with frequencies of 53.21% and 47.97%, respectively; QGl-4A2 segregated in POP1, POP3, and POP5 with frequencies of 45.51%, 58.51%, and 46.25%, respectively.
Plant hight-related genes
We identified three genes associated with plant height: RHT-8, Rht-24_AP, and Rht-D1. RHT-8 showed segregation in POP1, POP4, and POP5, with gene frequencies ranging from 48.39 to 56.42%. Rht-24_AP segregated in POP1, POP4, and POP5 with gene frequencies ranging from 49.28 to 53.21%. Rht-D1 showed segregation in POP3 with a gene frequency of 43.62% (Fig. 2).
The gene infrequence and gene combination of grain-related gene
We analyzed the aggregation of grain-related genes based on the presence or absence of the stripe rust resistance genes Yr29, Yr17, and Yr78 across five populations (Fig. 3). The analysis considered four scenarios: the absence of all three genes, the presence of Yr29 alone, or their presence in various combinations. Results indicated that grain-related genes predominantly appeared in combinations of 2, 3 and 4 genes when all three were absent, peaking most frequently in 3 genes (26.42%), exhibiting a normal distribution centered around 3. When Yr29 was present alone, grain-related gene aggregations (refer to co-localization or clustering of genes with similar functions, often on a chromosome) were most common in three-gene combinations (32.08%). With Yr29 and Yr78 co-aggregating, grain-related traits are predominantly associated with 2, 3, and 4 genes (29.30%, 30.28% ,and 24.77%, respectively), exhibiting a normal distribution centered around five. Similarly, when Yr29, Yr78, and Yr17 co-aggregated, the aggregation pattern peaked with 2 and 3 genes (36.43% and 26.35%). We analyzed the frequency changes of grain-related genes based on the presence or absence of the three stripe rust resistance genes Yr29, Yr17, and Yr78 across five different populations, considering three possible combinations (Fig. 4). With the progressive pyramiding of the three genes, the number of pyramided grain-related genes stabilized at three. However, when Yr29, Yr17, and Yr78 were pyramided together, the number of grain-related genes pyramided was predominantly two. This suggests that the pyramiding of these three genes (Yr29, Yr17, Yr78) does not interfere with (or: did not significantly alter) the pyramiding of grain-related genes. Initially, the trend in grain gene frequency changes was consistent in the absence of all genes and when Yr29 was present alone. However, the frequency changes of grain-related genes were similar in combinations of Yr29 + Yr78 and Yr29 + Yr17 + Yr78. Genes including TaSus2-2B, TaGW2-6 A, and TaT6P exhibited increasing gene frequency trends in the Yr29 + Yr78 and Yr29 + Yr17 + Yr78 combinations. In contrast, genes including TaCwi-A, Tabas, and TaGS5-A displayed decreasing gene frequency trends in the same combinations, Yr29 + Yr78 and Yr29 + Yr17 + Yr78. QGL-4 A remains unchanged under four situations.
Principal component analysis of six population
Principal component analysis (PCA) of five populations (POP1 to POP5) (Fig. 5) reveals that genetic samples are tightly clustered on the PCA plot. The PCA results indicated that the first two principal components (Dm1 and Dm2) accounted for 14.5% and 9.3% of the genetic variation, respectively. Along these two principal component dimensions, populations POP1, POP2, and POP3 clustered closely together with significant overlap, indicating a close genetic relatedness and high genetic similarity among these groups. In contrast, POP4 and POP5 were positioned farther away from POP1 and POP2. While POP4 and POP5 showed partial overlap with each other, they were predominantly distributed in distinct regions of the PCA space. This spatial separation suggests lower genetic similarity between POP4 and POP5, and between POP1 and POP2. High genetic similarity among populations due to sharing the same paternal wheat variety. For example, Plateau GY448 and QM1 derive form the same parental source, ‘Gaoyuan 602’, accounts for the substantial overlap observed between POP4 and POP5 on the PCA plot. POP1 exhibits the smallest circle, indicating the most concentrated data, and intersects with POP2 and POP3 the most frequently. Conversely, POP4 displays the largest circle, indicating relatively dispersed data. Furthermore, despite considerable overlap, distinct separations are evident among populations, with greater distances indicating larger differences. POP2 is relatively distant from the other populations, possibly due to its more distant genetic relationship with them.
Discussion
Introducing new genetic resources can enrich the wheat genetic pool in China and broaden its genetic basis, an effective strategy for enhancing Chinese wheat varieties28. The primary source of improvement for the spring wheat variety in China is CIMMYT wheat. Mucuy exhibited high resistance to yellow rust (YR) across multi-year field trials in Mexico, Kenya, and India. Molecular mapping identified four leaf rust (LR) and six YR resistance loci (Refers to specific genomic regions associated with resistance traits) in Mucuy, with two co-located resistance loci—QYr.cim-1BL/QLr.cim-1BL and QYr.cim-2AS/QLr.cim2AS—corresponding to Lr46/Yr29/Sr58/Pm39 and Yr17, respectively. This study detected seven promising alleles in MUCUY, including QYrqin.nwafu-2AL, QYrqin.nwafu-6BS, Yr17, Yr29, Yr78 (6BS), Yr75 (2BS), and Yr80 (2AL).
Yr29 is a prevalent and effective gene in Chinese common wheat. The previously identified QTLs—Yr17, Yr78, and Yr29—demonstrate strong additive effects in MUCUY resistance studies. The stripe rust severity in lines with Yr29 + Yr17, Yr29 + Yr78, and Yr29 + Yr17 + Yr78 combinations was 8.8%, 27.2%, and 7.0%, respectively32. Stacking Yr29 with other stripe rust resistance genes like Yr24 and Yr26 enhances resistance, with this synergistic effect validated across various environments35. The variable resistance effects of Yr29 across different genetic backgrounds suggest that gene-gene and gene-environment interactions significantly influence disease resistance36. In our study, the Yr17 gene was undetected in POP1, POP2, and POP3, suggesting that introgressing Yr17 into the genotypes of HST, ABO, and QC38 is challenging. POP4 and POP5 pyramided the Yr29 + Yr17 combination, with 30% and 23% of lines already possessing this pyramid, respectively. Combining all-stage and high-temperature adult-plant (HTAP) resistance QTLs, as seen in the winter wheat cultivar Madsen, provides a robust approach to achieving high-level, durable resistance to stripe rust. Traditionally, Yr17’s effectiveness has been overcome by most Pst races. However, some studies suggest that Yr17’s resistance is due to multiple QTLs, including QYrMa.wgp-2AS, which seems to confer HTAP resistance rather than race-specific all-stage resistance. This implies that the 2NS chromosome from Ae. ventricosa may harbor additional resistance genes requiring further investigation37. Yr78 confers partial resistance at the adult plant stage but is ineffective in seedlings. The effectiveness of Yr78 against new Pst races in the western USA, Australia, and Asia, where the favorable IWA7257 allele is less common, is noteworthy38. A strong synergistic effect exists between QYr.nwafu-6BL and QYrsnb.nwafu-2BL, and multi-gene pyramiding can achieve higher resistance levels, a strategy applicable in breeding.
The Yr75 gene is on chromosome 7 A in the Australian wheat variety Axe. Yr75 differs from the typical slow rusting resistance (APR) genes Yr29 and Yr18, potentially harboring a unique resistance mechanism to complement existing strategies39. In our study, the Yr75 gene was identified in Abodanza and mucuy, with segregation observed in POP2, POP3, POP4, and POP5, exhibiting gene frequencies from 43.91 to 60.63%. However, this gene locus was not identified in previous QTL mapping studies on mucuy32and field resistance surveys for Abandon and mucuy did not demonstrate the gene’s effectiveness. Additionally, Heshangtou and Gaoyuan 776 showed moderate resistance at the adult plant stage, suggesting the accumulation of adult plant resistance genes in these varieties. The stripe rust gene combination in Heshangtou includes QYrxn.nwafu-1BL, QYrsn.nwafu-2AS, QYrqin.nwafu-2AL, QYrqin.nwafu-2BL, QYr.nwafu-3BS, QYrsn.nwafu-3DL, QYrqin.nwafu-6BS, and Yr18, whereas Gaoyuan 776 combines QYrxn.nwafu-1BL, QYrqin.nwafu-2AL, QYr.nwafu-3BS, Yr78, and Yr80. However, determining which specific combinations are effective or if there are other undetected genes and loci requires further analysis.
Is there a positive correlation between the number of resistance genes and disease resistance? Using a breeding chip, we detected those six parents harbored 4–9 resistance genes each, with HST and Mucuy carrying 9 and 7 genes, respectively, showing the most robust field resistance, nearly immune. These results suggest a positive correlation between the number of resistance genes and disease resistance. However, previous multi-year, multi-environment studies on Mucuy revealed that not all genes are active, and various gene combinations yield different resistance effects, with the most effective being Yr29 + Yr17, Yr29 + Yr78, and Yr29 + Yr17 + Yr7832. Additional research has confirmed that combining 1–2 non-immune seedling resistance genes with 2–3 adult plant resistance genes can confer near-immune resistance under various environmental conditions at the adult plant stage, a key factor in the enduring resistance of CIMMYT wheat lines.
Furthermore, determining which combinations of the aggregated resistance genes in HST play a decisive role will require further analysis, including resistance evaluations across different family lines within the population. Analysis of 691 families indicated that the maximum number of aggregated resistance genes was nine, achieved by only nine families. Moreover, none of the offspring families exceeded the parental gene aggregation count, suggesting that elite wheat materials might be limited to accumulating no more than nine genes. In other studies, materials carrying various resistance genes, including QYr.nwafu-4BL, Yr15, Yr17, and others, those with 2–6 aggregated stripe rust resistance genes constituted 24, 22, 11, 14, and 3 individuals, respectively, totaling 94.87% of the population40. A study focusing on the Zhou 8425B line and its derivatives revealed that Zhou 8425B possesses the highest number of genes conferring resistance to stripe rust. In progeny varieties like Zhoumai 12 and Zhoumai 17, a pyramiding of four stripe rust resistance genes originating from Zhou 8425B has been achieved10.
QGl-4 A, TaSus2-2B, TaCwi-A1, Tabas1, TaGS5-A1, TaGW2-6 A, and TaT6P are high-impact genes associated with grain traits and yield in wheat. In a QTL analysis of the wheat population Zhongmai 578/Jimai 22, TaSus2-2B emerged as a potential candidate gene influencing several yield traits12. The Hap-H haplotype of the TaSus2-2B gene represented 44% of varieties in the 1990s, increasing to 56.9% in recent wheat varieties from China’s second district. This indicates that selective breeding for high thousand-kernel weight (TKW) has increased the frequency of the high-TKW-associated Hap-H haplotype in the TaSus2-2B gene26. These genes can also exhibit genetic additive effects, where the combined effects are particularly potent. In this study, we detected seven grain-related genes, with the parent QM1 showing the highest aggregation of six grain-weight genes.
In contrast, HST lacked high grain weight haplotypes and exhibited lower yields and grain traits. A positive correlation between the number of aggregated grain-related genes and grain size and yield may also exist. Among the 691 lines, those with two aggregated grain-related genes were the most common, with no lines aggregating six genes. The offspring’s gene aggregation did not exceed the parental levels. However, determining if lines with superior yield and grain traits can be selected from these requires further verification via phenotypic and genotypic assessments of the families. Other studies have also shown additive effects among grain-related traits, like TaGW2-6B and TaDA1, which negatively regulate wheat grain weight and size42. In 49 primary Qinghai wheat varieties, TaCwi-A1, TaGW2-6 A, and TaTGW6-4 A were analyzed, with results indicating that materials carrying the TaCwi-A1a + Hap6A–A + TaTGW64 combination had the highest thousand-grain weight15.
We analyzed the frequency changes of grain-related genes based on the presence or absence of the stripe rust resistance genes Yr29, Yr17, and Yr78 across five distinct populations, considering three potential combinations. Initially, the trend in grain gene frequency changes was consistent in the absence of any genes and when Yr29 was the sole gene present. However, similar frequency changes in grain-related genes were observed in the combinations of Yr29 + Yr78 and Yr29 + Yr17 + Yr78. Genes including TaSus2-2B, TaGW2-6 A, and TaT6P exhibited an increasing trend in frequency within both the Yr29 + Yr78 and Yr29 + Yr17 + Yr78 combinations. In contrast, genes such as TaCwi-A, Tabas, and TaGS5-A showed a decreasing trend in frequency within the Yr29 + Yr78 and Yr29 + Yr17 + Yr78 combinations. Resistance and yield are complex traits that influence plant physiology, morphology, and the environment. The relationship between molecular growth-defense trade-offs and disease-resistance-yield antagonism remains unclear. In crops, qualitative and quantitative resistance often correlates with genetic variations associated with reduced yield, though exceptions exist.
The wheat resistance gene Sr26 for stem rust, and the barley gene mlo for powdery mildew are reported to result in average yield reductions of 9%, and 4.2%, respectively. However, a few studies have identified genes that can enhance resistance and yield. For example, the OsGRF6 gene promotes high yields in rice with large panicles and significantly enhances resistance to bacterial blight43. This suggests that precise regulation of immune signals to allocate resources for growth without pathogens, and integrating multiple signaling pathways to reallocate resources for appropriate immunity during pathogen attacks, could synergistically enhance yield and disease resistance.
Analysis of the phenotype and genotype of six parental lines revealed that the genotypes of known genes in some parents correspond to phenotypic characteristics. For example, MUCUY contains seven adult-plant resistance genes, aligning closely with previous QTL results for MUCUY. GY448 contained the grain-related genes TaGW2-6 A and TaT6p, exhibiting a large grain area and width phenotype. Moreover, some genes did not improve grain weight or plant height, and in some cases, even performed worse than the absence of the gene. In the parent Heshangtou, despite the presence of Rht-D1b and Rht24_AP2 genes, the plant height reached 140 cm, with no significant reduction in stature. The combined effect of these two genes did not yield an additive decrease in plant height.
Molecular marker-assisted breeding (MAB) serves as a crucial tool in modern wheat breeding, with its application in disease-resistance breeding becoming increasingly widespread. Compared to conventional breeding, marker-assisted selection (MAS) can significantly enhance the efficiency of gene pyramiding. In the United States, utilizing marker-assisted backcrossing (MAS-BC) technology, 27 disease resistance genes and 20 quality-related alleles have been successfully transferred into 180 wheat lines through targeted breeding44. CIMMYT has pyramided genes such as Yr29/Lr46/Pm39 or Yr18/Lr34/Pm38, along with other adult-plant resistance genes into single wheat cultivars. This effort has yielded a series of materials with multiple resistances, high resistance levels, and durable resistance, including varieties such as ‘Pavon 76’, ‘Jupateco 73R’, ‘Attila’, ‘Kukuna’, ‘Vivitsi’, ‘Amadina’, ‘Chapio’, and ‘Tukuru’. The resistance of these varieties has been maintained for several decades8,45. The Wheat Breeders’ Chip integrates effective markers for most developed functional genes, offering significant advantages to wheat breeders. It increases breeding speed, reduces costs, and enables the efficient pyramiding of genes associated with multiple traits. However, further exploration is needed better to apply the Breeder Chip technology in practical breeding programs. This may involve addressing several key questions, such as Which generation is optimal for detection? Which functional genes have substantial phenotypic effects, thus allowing for marker optimization? Furthermore, could chips be designed to be more region-specific for wheat varieties adapted to distinct growing areas, thereby improving their utility? This study utilized five populations sharing the same paternal parent but different maternal parents to analyze the distribution frequency of target genes in the F2 generation. We found that some genes cannot be successfully transmitted to offspring through hybridization. For example, Yr17 failed to be transferred into ABO, HST, and QC38. However, GY448 and QM1 were able to combine Yr29, Yr17, and Yr78 along with other grain-related genes. It is anticipated that in later stages, candidate breeding lines with both disease resistance and high yield will be developed. This result was to explore genotyping patterns in F2 populations, providing valuable data references for the application of breeder chip technology in wheat breeding programs within the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau wheat region. This study employed the GBW0.1K functional marker chip to analyze six main spring wheat varieties on the Qinghai Plateau—ABO, HST, GY448, QM1, QC38—and 693 families across five F2 populations for known genes. The analysis focused on the genetic characteristics of disease resistance, grain-related, and dwarf genes in the F2 generation. GBW0.1K genotypic data correlated highly with phenotypic data, and normal gene segregation was observed within populations, demonstrating GBW0.1K’s efficacy in molecular-assisted breeding and its applicability for future molecular breeding. Furthermore, validating the genetic effects of various genotypes within populations requires substantial phenotypic data, marking the next phase of our research. Enhancing the multi-resistance and durable resistance of the main cultivated varieties on the Qinghai Plateau through Mucuy is feasible; however, we must not neglect the possibility of undiscovered or newly discovered genes in these parents, warranting further research into gene discovery.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Shewry, P. R. & Hey, S. J. The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food Energy Secur. H. 4, 178–202 (2015).
Ray, D. K., Ramankutty, N., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C. & Foley, J. A. Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nat. Commun. 3, 1293. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms229 (2012).
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 108, 20260–20264. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108 (2011).
Muterko, A., Kalendar, R. & Salina, E. Allelic variation at the VERNALIZATION-A1, VRN-B1, VRN-B3, and PHOTOPERIOD-A1 genes in cultivars of Triticum durum Desf. Planta 244, 1253–1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-016-2584-5 (2016).
Zhu, Z. et al. Molecular characterization and validation of adult-plant Stripe rust resistance gene Yr86 in Chinese wheat cultivar Zhongmai 895. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 136, 142. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04374-2
Krattinger, S. G. et al. A putative ABC transporter confers durable resistance to multiple fungal pathogens in wheat. *Science* 323 (5915), 1360–1363 (2009).
Qingdong, Z. & Chuan, S. Analysis of the effectiveness of known genes for wheat Stripe rust resistance against current Circulating races in China. J. Plant. Pathol. 45 (6), 641–650 (2015).
Singh, R. P., Huerta-Espino, J. & William, H. M. Genetics and breeding for durable resistance to leaf and Stripe rusts in wheat. Turkish J. Agric. Forestry. 29, 1–7 (2005).
He Zhonghu, L. et al. Advances and prospects in research on adult plant resistance to Stripe rust and powdery mildew in wheat (in Chinese). Chin. Agricultural Sci. 44, 2193–2215 (2011).
Liu Zhiyong, Z. et al. Current status and strategy of wheat s tripe rust resistance gene breeding utilization in China (in Chinese). Chin. Agricultural Sci. 57 (01), 34–51 (2024).
Zhang, Y., Li, B. & You, M. A novel variation of TaGW2-6B increases grain weight without penalty in grain protein content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Mol. Breeding. 44, 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-024-01455-y (2024).
Jiang Qiyan, J. et al. Xueyong Zhang the wheat (T. aestivum) sucrose synthase 2 gene (TaSus2) active in endosperm development is associated with yield traits. Funct. Integr. Genomics. 11, 49–61 (2011).
Jiang, Y. et al. A yield-associated gene tacwi, in wheat: Its function, selection and evolution in global breeding revealed by haplotype analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-014-2417-5 (2015).
Gao, Z. et al. Distribution of genes associated with yield potential and water-saving in Chinese Zone II wheat detected by developed functional markers. J Genet. & Integrative Genomics. (https://link.springer.com/article/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-010-0188-x) (2015).
Zhang Yemeng, Z. et al. Distribution of three grain weight genes in Qinghai plateau spring wheat varieties (in Chinese). J. Cereal Crops. 42 (10), 1200–1207 (2022).
Brenchley, R. et al. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature 149, 705–710 (2012).
Ling, H. Q. et al. Draft genome of the wheat A-genome progenitor Triticum urartu. Nature 496, 87–90 (2013).
Jia, J. Z. et al. Aegilops tauschii draft genome sequence reveals a gene repertoire for wheat adaptation. Nature 496, 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-010-0188-x) (2013). https://link.springer.com/article/
Nave, R. A. M. et al. Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication. Science 357, 93–97 (2017).
Chaos, S. RFLP-Based genetic maps of homoeologous group 7 chromosomes of wheat and barley. Theoretical Appl. Genet. 78, 495–504 (1989).
Williams, J. G. et al. DNA polymorphisms amplified by byarbitrary primers areuseful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18 (22), 6531–6535 (1990).
Roder, M. S. et al. A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics 149 (4), 2007–2023 (1998).
Pestsova, E., Ganal, M. W. & Roder, M. S. Isolation and mapping of microsatellite markers Spcificfor the D genome. Genome 43 (4), 689–697 (2000).
Zhuang Qiaosheng. Chinese wheat variety improvement and pedigree analysis (in Chinese). J. Cereal Crops. 1 (1), 74 (2003).
Xiang, M. et al. Preliminary analysis of the ecological types of main spring wheat cultivars in Xinjiang (in Chinese). Xinjiang Agricultural Sci., (01): 3–6. (1982).
Cao, P. et al. Identification of the quantitative trait loci controlling spike-related traits in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aesti-vum L). Planta 250, 1967–1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-019-03278-0 (2019).
Rasheed, A. et al. Crop breeding chips and genotyping platforms:progress, challenges, and perspectives. Mol. Plant. 10, 1047–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2017.06.008 (2017).
Zhang, Y. et al. Adaptability analysis of CIMMYT wheat in China’s spring wheat region (in Chinese). Chin. Agricultural Sci., (04): 655–663. (2006).
Wu Zhenlu. Preliminary analysis of the ecological types of main spring wheat cultivars in Xinjiang (in Chinese). Xinjiang Agricultural Sci., (01): 3–6. (1982).
Zha Fuyun. Introduction trial of Qingchun 38 wheat at Huangzhong County seed breeding farm (in Chinese). Agricultural Dev. Equip., (10): 150– (2018).
Yingchun, B. Wang Jianping. Preliminary report on the introduction trial of the wheat variety plateau 448 at Huangzhong County seed breeding Farm(in Chinese). Qinghai Agricultural Sci. Technol., (01): 46–47. (2002).
Liu, D. M. et al. Stripe rust and leaf rust resistance in CIMMYT wheat line mucuy is conferred by combinations of race-specifific and adult-plant resistance loci. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 880138 (2022).
Lan, C. X. et al. Identification of genomic regions controlling adult-plant Stripe rust resistance in Chinese landrace Pingyuan 50 through bulked Segregant analysis. Phytopathology 100 (4), 313–318 (2010).
Dreisigacker, S., Sehgal, D., Luna, B., Reyes, A. E. & Mollins, J. CIMMYT Wheat Molecular Genetics Laboratory Protocols and Applications To Wheat Breeding (CIMMYT, 2012).
Liu, S. et al. Slow Stripe rusting in Chinese wheat Jimai 44 conferred by Yr29 in combination with a major QTL on chromosome arm 6AL. Theor. Appl. Genet. 136 (175), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04420-z (2023).
Herrera-Foessel, S. A. et al. New slow-rusting leaf rust and Stripe rust resistance genes Lr67 and Yr46 in wheat are pleiotropic or closely linked. Theor. Appl. Genet. 122, 239–249 (2011).
Liu, L. et al. Combination of allstage and hightemperature adultplant resistance QTL confers highlevel, durable resistance to Stripe rust in winter wheat cultivar Madsen. Theor. Appl. Genet. 131, 1835–1849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-018-3116-4 (2018).
Maccaferri, M. et al. A genome-wide association study of resistance to Stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. Sp. tritici) in a worldwide collection of hexaploid Sp.ing wheat (Triticum aestivum L). G3 (Bethesda). 5, 449–465 (2015).
Kanwal, M. et al. An adult plant Stripe rust resistance gene maps on chromosome 7A of Australian wheat cultivar axe. Theor. Appl. Genet. 134, 2213–2220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-021-03818-x (2021).
Xi, L., Wang, Y., Zhu, W. & Wang, Y. Identification and molecular detection of Stripe rust resistance genes in 78 Sichuan wheat cultivars (lines). J. Crop Sci. 47 (07), 1309–1323 (2021).
Jiang Qiyan, H. et al. Xueyong. The wheat (T. aestivum) sucrose synthase 2 gene (TaSus2) active in endosperm development is associated with yield traits. Funct Integr Genomics 11:49–61. (2011).
Bi, C. et al. A novel variation of TaGW2-6B increases grain weight without penalty in grain protein content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Mol. Breeding. 44, 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-024-01455-y (2024).
Ruihua, Y. H. C. M. F. F. Z. X. W., Fengfeng, S. & Xiong, L. OsGRF6-OsYUCCA1/OsWRKY82 signaling cascade upgrade grain yield and bacterial blight resistance in rice. Adv. Sci. (Weinh). 2407733, 1–16 (2024).
Sorrells, M. E. Application of new knowledge, technologies, and strategies to wheat improvement. Euphytica 157 (3), 299–306 (2007).
Singh, R. P. & Rajaram, S. Genetics of adult-plant resistance to leaf rust in ‘frontana’ and three CIMMYT wheats. Genome 35 (1), 24–31 (1992).
Funding
This work was supported by the Foundation of Application of Basic Research Project of Qinghai Province (Grant No. 2022-ZJ-737).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DM-L, HQ-W, WJ-C, RJ-L and JC-S conceived of the project. DM-L and AHE-S wrote the paper. HQ-W and WJ-C performed the developmental analyses, FH-Y and JC-S evaluated phenotyping of the RILs. DM-L and RU-L performed Phenotype and KASP analyses.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, D., El-Sappah, A.H., Eldomiaty, A.S. et al. Genetic analysis identifies key loci for traits and resistance in Qinghai plateau wheat F2 populations. Sci Rep 15, 30526 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11892-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11892-0