Table 7 Comparison of relative similarity grades.
Similarity measures in different structures | Relative grades | Ranking order | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(\:{\varvec{\uprho\:}}_{1}\) | \(\:{\varvec{\uprho\:}}_{2}\) | \(\:{\varvec{\uprho\:}}_{3}\) | \(\:{\varvec{\uprho\:}}_{4}\) | \(\:{\varvec{\uprho\:}}_{5}\) | \(\:{\varvec{\uprho\:}}_{6}\) | ||
Wei52 | 0.2153 | 0.1939 | 0.2004 | 0.2674 | 0.2842 | 0.2932 | \(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{6}\:>\:{{\uprho\:}}_{5}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{4}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{1}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{2}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{3}\) |
Ullah et al14. | 0.2396 | 0.2140 | 0.2027 | 0.2419 | 0.2650 | 0.2751 | \(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{6}\:>{{\uprho\:}}_{5}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{4}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{1}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{2}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{3}\) |
Shishavan et al71. | 0.2922 | 0.2759 | 0.2482 | 0.3146 | 0.3478 | 0.3553 | \(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{6}\:>{{\uprho\:}}_{5}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{4}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{1}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{2}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{3}\) |
Gupta and Kumar72 | 0.2158 | 0.2028 | 0.2110 | 0.2361 | 0.2547 | 0.2637 | \(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{6}\:>{{\uprho\:}}_{5}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{4}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{1}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{2}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{3}\) |
Wu et al50. | 0.3590 | 0.3148 | 0.3036 | 0.3866 | 0.4214 | 0.4214 | \(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{6}\:>{{\uprho\:}}_{5}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{4}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{1}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{2}\)>\(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{3}\) |
Proposed structure of SM for p, q,r − FFS | \(\:0.8614\) | \(\:0.8441\) | \(\:0.8343\) | \(\:0.8219\) | \(\:0.8626\) | \(\:0.8641\) | \(\:{{\uprho\:}}_{6}>{{\uprho\:}}_{5}>{{\uprho\:}}_{1}>{{\uprho\:}}_{2}>{{\uprho\:}}_{3}>{{\uprho\:}}_{4}\) |
