Table 6 Performance comparison of DNFCR models versus deepsurvcr and coxph models.
Model performance comparison | Event | ΔC-index (95% CI) | Z-score | p-value | ΔIBS | ΔINBLL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNFCR-PF vs. CoxPH | HF | + 0.05 (0.01 to 0.09) | 2.14 | 0.032 | -0.02 | + 0.12 |
Other causes | + 0.06 (0.02 to 0.10) | 2.31 | 0.021 | -0.02 | + 0.10 | |
DNFCR-NF vs. CoxPH | HF | + 0.04 (0.005 to 0.075) | 2.01 | 0.044 | -0.01 | + 0.09 |
Other causes | + 0.05 (0.01 to 0.09) | 2.18 | 0.029 | -0.02 | + 0.08 | |
DeepSurvCR vs. CoxPH | HF | + 0.04 (0.001 to 0.079) | 1.96 | 0.049 | -0.02 | + 0.07 |
Other causes | + 0.05 (0.01 to 0.09) | 2.05 | 0.040 | -0.02 | + 0.06 | |
DNFCR-PF vs. DNFCR-NF | HF | + 0.03 (0.005 to 0.055) | 1.99 | 0.046 | -0.01 | + 0.03 |
Other causes | + 0.01 (-0.01 to 0.03) | 0.87 | 0.384 | 0.00 | + 0.02 | |
DNFCR-PF vs. DeepSurvCR | HF | + 0.01 (0.001 to 0.019) | 1.97 | 0.048 | 0.00 | + 0.05 |
Other causes | -0.01 (-0.03 to 0.01) | 0.45 | 0.652 | 0.00 | + 0.04 |
