Table 10 Comparative analysis of existing methods vs. proposed framework.
Method | Core components | Key features | Limitations | AUC (avg) | F1-score (avg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOTE + TabNet | Classical Oversampling + TabNet | Fast, interpretable, lightweight | Poor minority class diversity; limited generalization | 0.79 | 0.76 |
ADASYN + TabNet | Adaptive Sampling + TabNet | Adjusts for class imbalance adaptively | Generates noisy borderline samples | 0.78 | 0.75 |
Deep-CTGAN + TabNet | GAN-based Generation + TabNet | Captures tabular distribution nuances | No feature-level enhancement | 0.82 | 0.79 |
ResNet + TabNet | Feature Enhancement + Classifier | Deep representation learning on tabular features | Sensitive to imbalanced data distribution | 0.80 | 0.77 |
Proposed (Hybrid) | Deep-CTGAN + ResNet + TabNet | End-to-end: generation, enhancement, interpretation | Higher runtime; added architectural complexity | 0.85 | 0.81 |