Table 8 Sensitivity analysis.
Parameter amounts | Outcomes of LFF-WASPAS method for various alternatives | Final ranking | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(\mathcal{t}=0.1\) | 0.244 | 0.180 | 0.272 | 0.223 | 0.232 | \({\mathcal{A}}_{3}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{1}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{5}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{4}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{2}\) | |
\(\mathcal{t}=0.2\) | 0.247 | 0.182 | 0.273 | 0.224 | 0.234 | \({\mathcal{A}}_{3}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{1}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{5}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{4}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{2}\) | |
\(\mathcal{t}=0.3\) | 0.249 | 0.184 | 0.274 | 0.226 | 0.236 | \({\mathcal{A}}_{3}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{1}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{5}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{4}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{2}\) | |
\(\mathcal{t}=0.4\) | 0.251 | 0.186 | 0.275 | 0.227 | 0.238 | \({\mathcal{A}}_{3}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{1}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{5}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{4}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{2}\) | |
\(\mathcal{t}=0.5\) | 0.254 | 0.188 | 0.276 | 0.228 | 0.240 | \({\mathcal{A}}_{3}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{1}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{5}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{4}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{2}\) | |
\(\mathcal{t}=0.6\) | 0.256 | 0.190 | 0.277 | 0.229 | 0.242 | \({\mathcal{A}}_{3}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{1}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{5}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{4}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{2}\) | |
\(\mathcal{t}=0.7\) | 0.259 | 0.192 | 0.278 | 0.231 | 0.244 | \({\mathcal{A}}_{3}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{1}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{5}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{4}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{2}\) | |
\(\mathcal{t}=0.8\) | 0.261 | 0.193 | 0.279 | 0.232 | 0.246 | \({\mathcal{A}}_{3}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{1}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{5}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{4}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{2}\) | |
\(\mathcal{t}=0.9\) | 0.264 | 0.195 | 0.280 | 0.233 | 0.248 | \({\mathcal{A}}_{3}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{1}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{5}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{4}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{2}\) | |
\(\mathcal{t}=1.0\) | 0.266 | 0.197 | 0.281 | 0.234 | 0.250 | \({\mathcal{A}}_{3}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{1}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{5}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{4}\succ {\mathcal{A}}_{2}\) | |
