Introduction

Sepsis is a major health problem with high mortality worldwide1and it is a common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI). Sepsis-associated AKI (SA-AKI) affects 60% of sepsis cases2. SA-AKI frequently occurs within the first 24 h of admission to intensive care unit (ICU), and it usually corresponds to more severe conditions, higher burden of disease and mortality, greater acute physiologic disorders, and longer length of stay than non-SA-AKI3. Due to the high morbidity and mortality of SA-AKI, relevant in-depth research is urgently required, and various prognostic factors should be fully explored and undergo prompt intervention, thereby lowering the mortality in SA-AKI. Therefore, it is of great significance to search for markers of early prediction of SA-AKI prognosis for risk stratification of SA-AKI.

SA-AKI has a high prevalence and involves diverse pathophysiological mechanisms including complement activation, systemic and renal inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system disorders, metabolic reprogramming, microcirculatory disorders, and macrocirculatory dysfunction4. Since neutrophils, monocytes, platelets, and lymphocytes are important players in the SA-AKI development and progression, some peripheral blood inflammation indicators (e.g. monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio [MLR], neutrophil-to-lymphocyte platelet ratio [N/LP], and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR]) are closely linked to SA-AKI, which have been applied to early warning and diagnosis of SA-AKI5. However, rare studies are available on the combination of neutrophil-to-platelet ratio (NPR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), PLR, neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio (NMR), N/LP, NMLR, and MLR for prognostic evaluation of SA-AKI, so further exploration is required. In addition, patient age, gender, comorbidities, severity, baseline health condition, and interventions are also influencing factors for SA-AKI prognosis, so multiple factors should be taken into account in the prognostic evaluation. Aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) (monocyte × neutrophil × platelet/lymphocyte) is superior to NLR, NPR, NMR, NMLR, PLR, N/LP, and MLR in displaying the full picture of blood cells and systemic inflammation status, and it is also an economical and rapidly available indicator. The predictive value of AISI in the prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis6COVID-19 7,8,9,10, hypertension11acute myocardial infarction12stroke13,14peritoneal dialysis15and tumors16,17,18,19 has been documented. However, the association of AISI with SA-AKI prognosis remains inconclusive and has been rarely studied.

This study intends to explore the impact of AISI on SA-AKI mortality and its significance for risk stratification of SA-AKI by using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV), offering an evidence-based basis for individualized treatment and decision-making and ameliorating the SA-AKI outcomes.

Methods

Data source

In this retrospective cohort study, data were acquired from the MIMIC-IV (v2.2), a publicly accessible database containing de-identified data of over 50,000 critically ill cases at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) in 2008–2019, and known for a wealth of clinical data on ICU patients. The Institutional Review Boards of BIDMC and Massachusetts Institute of Technology approved the database use. To meet ethical standards and protect patient privacy, all data used were authenticated and all precautions were taken. The author (Ruming Liu) completed the Protecting Human Research Participants, an NIH web-based course (Record ID: 62088444) and was therefore granted access to the MIMIC-IV. Since de-identified data were utilized, the Ethics Committee of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) waived the consent requirement. This manuscript conforms to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guidelines for observational studies20.

Study population

SA-AKI patients who were first admitted to the ICU were selected. Sepsis, as defined by Sepsis-3.0, refers to fatal organ impairment resulting from dysregulation of host responses to infections (SOFA ≥ 2)21. A diagnosis AKI is made in the case of an increase in serum creatinine by 1.5-fold from baseline within 7 d or ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (≥ 26.5 µmol/L) within 48 h, or urine volume < 0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 h22. SA-AKI refers to the presence of AKI within 7 d of sepsis diagnosis4. The study population was all admitted to the ICU and met the diagnostic criteria for sepsis/AKI/SA-AKI. Exclusion criteria: (1) the duration of follow-up < 1 d; (2) missing values in the lymphocyte/monocyte/platelet/neutrophil count; (3) outliers were recorded. For multiple admissions, only the first admission data were recorded. Finally, 9714 patients were included (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart showing patient screening and inclusion.

Calculation of AISI

AISI was calculated as follows: [neutrophil count (109/L) × platelet count (109/L) × monocyte count (109/L)/lymphocyte count (109/L)]23.

Data extraction

The following data (within the first 24 h of ICU admission) were acquired from the MIMIC-IV by SQL: (1) baseline data: gender, race, age, and body mass index; (2) vital signs: temperature_mean, heart_rate_mean, resp_rate_mean, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, MBP_mean, and SpO2_mean; (3) laboratory tests: lymphocyte, monocyte, platelet, neutrophil, bilirubin_total, serum creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, glucose_mean, lactate, prothrombin time, and partial thromboplastin time; (4) scores: Glasgow Coma Scale, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II; (5) comorbidities: type 2 diabetes (T2D), coronary atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cirrhosis, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, and peptic ulcer; (6) interventions: antibiotic, norepinephrine, ventilation_status, and continuous renal replacement therapy. For laboratory indicators measured multiple times within 24 h of ICU admission, the percentage of missing values was calculated for each continuous variable to minimize bias caused by sample exclusion. For variables with a percentage of missing values < 30%, the missing values were predicted by random forest-based multiple imputation, and the results of five predictions were averaged. We excluded the variables with too many missing values (> 30%).

Outcomes

The primary outcome was 30-d mortality, and the secondary outcomes were 90-d, 180-d, and 1-year mortality.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were presented by mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range) as appropriate, and underwent a t-test or a nonparametric test. Categorical variables were described by frequencies and percentages, and underwent a chi-square test. To identify the association of AISI with mortality, we utilized Cox proportional hazard regression models to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The patients were assigned into a Low AISI Group (AISI < 735.405 × 1018/L) and a High AISI Group (AISI ≥ 735.405 × 1018/L) based on the median of AISI. To enhance the robustness of results, the regression estimates were corrected by Model 1 (unadjusted), Model 2 (adjusted for gender, age, and race), and Model 3 (adjusted for all covariates). Moreover, the potential nonlinear relation between AISI and mortality was presented by restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to compare the survival rate between the two groups (log-rank test). Furthermore, subgroup and interaction analyses were conducted on the primary outcome, and the former was stratified by gender (male/female), comorbidities (COPD, CAHD, cerebrovascular disease, cirrhosis, congestive heart failure, peptic ulcer disease, and T2D), norepinephrine, antibiotic, ventilation status, and Crrt mode. R4.4.1 was utilized, and P < 0.05 (two-sided) suggested statistical significance.

Results

Baseline characteristics

According to the eligibility criteria, 9714 SA-AKI patients were finally included, of which 5629 (57.9%) were males and 4085 (42.1%) were females. They consisted of 7687 (79.1%) 30-d survivors and 2027 (20.9%) 30-d deaths. The High AISI Group primarily included patients with higher age, mean heart rate, mean temperature, mean blood glucose, mean respiratory rate, neutrophil count, monocyte count, platelet count, SAPS II score, AST, and PT, non-CRRT, non-cirrhosis, non-COPD, and non-peptic ulcer patients, and antibiotic-treated patients (P < 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics.

Association of AISI with mortality in SA-AKI

The association of AISI with mortality in SA-AKI was assessed by HR with 95% CI using Cox proportional hazard regression models (Table 2). We found a higher 30-d mortality in the High AISI Group (P < 0.05). Specifically, the 30-d mortality in the High AISI Group (H735.405 × 1018/L) was 1.377 [HR (95% CI): 1.377 (1.261–1.504)], 1.313 [HR (95% CI): 1.313 (1.202–1.435)], and 1.184 times [HR (95% CI): 1.184 (1.082–1.296)] that in the Low AISI Group (< 735.405 × 1018/L), respectively, in Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3. The High AISI Group also had higher 90-/180-d and 1-year mortality (P < 0.05), and Kaplan-Meier analyses confirmed higher 30-/90-/180-d and 1-year survival rates in the Low AISI Group (Plog−rank<0.0001) (Fig. 2).

Table 2 Multivariable Cox regression analysis for mortality.
Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparison of Kaplan–Meier survival curves between groups: (A) 30-day survival curves; (B) 90-day survival curves; (C) 180-day survival curves; (D) 1-year survival curves.

RCS analyses

The association of AISI with mortality in SA-AKI was visualized by RCS curves (Fig. 3), and we found a nonlinear relation between AISI and 30-d mortality in SA-AKI (Pnonlinear<0.001). In this J-shaped relation, the cutoff of AISI was 450.117 × 1018/L. The mortality in SA-AKI rose with the increase in AISI when AISI > 450.117 × 1018/L. Similarly, the 90-/180-d and 1-year mortality in SA-AKI displayed nonlinear relations with AISI (Pnonlinear<0.001). In the threshold analysis, the HR value for 30-d mortality in patients with AISI < 450.117 × 10¹⁸/L (Table 3) was 0.517 (95% CI: 0.424–0.631) (P < 0.001), indicating that for each unit increase in AISI, the 30-d mortality decreased by 48.3%. In contrast, AISI and 30-d mortality were positively correlated with each other when AISI ≥ 450.117 × 10¹⁸/L [HR (95% CI): 3.600 (2.740–4.731)] (Table 3). Similar results were observed for 90-d, 180-d, and 1-year mortality.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Nonlinear relationship between AISI and all-cause mortality in SA-AKI: (A) 30-day mortality; (B) 90-day mortality; (C) 180-day mortality; (D) 1-year mortality.

Table 3 The threshold effects of AISI and SA-AKI were analyzed using a two-segment regression model.

Subgroup analyses

As shown in Table 4, the association of AISI with 30-d mortality in SA-AKI was more significant in the subgroups of male [HR (95% CI): 1.215 (1.077–1.371)], antibiotic [HR (95% CI): 1.180 (1.078–1.293)], mechanical ventilation [HR (95% CI): 1.182 (1.059–1.321)], non-mechanical ventilation [HR (95% CI): 1.206 (1.027–1.415)], non-CRRT [HR (95% CI): 1.185 (1.072–1.310)], non-norepinephrine [HR (95% CI): 1.189 (1.085–1.302)], non-COPD [HR (95% CI): 1.207 (1.091–1.334)], CAHD [HR (95% CI): 1.228 (1.064–1.418)], non-CAHD [HR (95% CI): 1.152 (1.024–1.297)], non-cerebrovascular disease [HR (95% CI): 1.193 (1.085–1.312)], non-cirrhosis [HR (95% CI): 1.196 (1.083–1.322)], congestive heart failure [HR (95% CI): 1.467 (1.125–1.912)], non-congestive heart failure [HR (95% CI): 1.144 (1.039–1.259)], non-peptic ulcer [HR (95% CI): 1.185 (1.082–1.297)], T2D [HR (95% CI): 1.211(1.028–1.427)], and non-T2D [HR (95% CI): 1.157 (1.038–1.291)] (P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses suggested no interaction of AISI with the stratified variables (Pinteraction>0.05), and the association of AISI with 30-d mortality was consistent across subgroups. To sum up, the stratified variables had no influence on the association of AISI with 30-d mortality in SA-AKI, and AISI acted as an independent factor influencing 30-d mortality in SA-AKI.

Table 4 Subgroup analyses.

Sensitivity analysis

To guarantee the accuracy of AISI calculation and its association with mortality, we excluded patients with diseases that might affect AISI and fitted three COX regression models. The results revealed that a significant positive correlation was still present between AISI and mortality in SA-AKI patients. The 30-d mortality in the High AISI Group (≥ 735.405 × 1018/L) was 1.371 [HR (95% CI): 1.371 (1.251–1.502)], 1.303 [HR (95% CI): 1.303 (1.189–1.429)], and 1.174 times [HR (95% CI): 1.174 (1.069–1.290)] that in the Low AISI Group (< 735.405 × 1018/L), respectively, in Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3. Similar results were observed for 90-d, 180-d, and 1-year mortality (Table S1).

Discussion

SA-AKI has complex pathophysiologic mechanisms involving systemic inflammatory response, microcirculatory disorders, and immune dysregulation. This study revealed a significant correlation of AISI, calculated by neutrophil, monocyte, platelet, and lymphocyte counts, with mortality in SA-AKI, and in this J-shaped relation, the cutoff of AISI was 450.117 × 1018/L; higher mortality in the High AISI Group, and a higher survival rate in the Low AISI Group. Subgroup analyses suggested that the association of AISI with 30-d mortality was consistent across subgroups. The findings offer a new perspective on clinical risk stratification.

Inflammation and immune response are known as key factors in sepsis development and progression24. Neutrophils, monocytes, platelets, and lymphocytes are important components of the immune system and are strongly implicated in the sepsis onset and development. NLR plus NPR is a reliable predictor of 28-d mortality in sepsis25whereas the association of NMR with 28-d mortality in sepsis remains inconclusive and to be further explored by a larger sample size, standardized methods, and specific patient groups. In addition, NMLR also exhibits value as an indicator for sepsis risk assessment and intervention26. A U-shaped relation of PLR at admission with mortality in sepsis has also been found, and an early decline in PLR indicates an elevation of in-hospital mortality27.

A variety of blood count-derived inflammation indicators are available for prognostic prediction of AKI. For example, PLR is used to predict the AKI prognosis in critically ill cases28. Changes in absolute monocyte and lymphocyte counts may reflect the pro-/anti-inflammatory balance in AKI, and MLR is used to predict short-term mortality in AKI in critically ill patients29. Moreover, MLR is positively correlated with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, and initial MLR and NLR can serve as independent risk factors for AKI in critically ill cases, both of which, however, are weak in predicting in-hospital mortality30. Elevation of N/LP leads to a higher risk of SA-AKI and severe AKI within 7 d of ICU admission, which is more significant in males, the elderly, infectious shock, and poor health31.

AISI is a novel inflammation indicator derived from the complete blood count, which integrates peripheral blood neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, and platelets, and outperforms PLR, MLR, NLR, N/LP, NPR, NMR, and NMLR in indicating the dynamic balance between pro-inflammatory (neutrophils, monocytes, platelets) and anti-inflammatory cells (lymphocytes). Elevation of AISI suggests the presence of both systemic inflammatory over-activation and immunosuppression. The important value of AISI in the prognostic evaluation of various diseases, and its great correlation with mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis have been documented6. Current research on inflammation has revealed a link between inflammatory processes and tumor transformation, progression, metastasis, and relapse32. A systematic review and meta-analysis identified AISI as a better predictor of cancer prognosis and higher AISI as a poor prognostic factor for non-metastatic or metastatic diseases and in targeted or immunotherapy17. It is reported that AISI is a better predictor of prognosis in late-stage non-small cell lung cancer16 and a potential marker for predicting the risk of prostate cancer progression19and higher AISI is also linked to a poorer prognosis in esophageal cancer18. Besides, inflammation is crucial in the onset and progression of cardiovascular diseases (e.g. atherosclerosis)33. Research suggests that AISI may act as an early warning indicator of poor prognosis in acute myocardial infarction12and that elevated AISI corresponds to an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive adults11. AISI also stays higher in stroke, especially hemorrhagic stroke, and it is related to mortality when beyond a certain limit, which can predict the stroke prognosis13,14. In addition, AISI can predict mortality in infectious diseases (e.g. COVID-19)10and its predictive value in sepsis mortality has also been verified in another retrospective study34. However, the impact of AISI on mortality in SA-AKI is rarely studied.

In this study, mortality greatly increased in the High AISI Group and displayed a J-shaped relation with AISI, which was considered to be possibly related to the synergy of inflammatory storm and immunosuppression. In the case of elevation of AISI, over-activation of neutrophils and monocytes results in an inflammatory storm that directly damages renal tubular epithelial cells and microvascular endothelial cells. Platelets are involved in microthrombosis and worsen local ischemia, and decreases in lymphocytes lead to immunosuppression and proneness to secondary infections. AISI, by dynamically reflecting the inflammatory and immune statuses, allows for early identification of high-risk groups, and its cutoff (450.117 × 10¹⁸/L) lays a quantitative basis for clinical risk stratification and interventions. Subgroup analyses suggested no interaction of AISI with the stratified variables, and AISI was an independent factor influencing 30-d mortality in SA-AKI.

SA-AKI is a prevalent complication of sepsis. As parts of the innate immune system, neutrophils, natural killer cells, and macrophages are implicated in AKI35. In sepsis, neutrophils are key players in the host inflammatory response to pathogens, which function mainly by degranulation, phagocytosis, and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) release; due to over-activation of neutrophils and NET release, endothelial cells will shift from an anticoagulant/anti-inflammatory phenotype to a pro-coagulant/pro-inflammatory phenotype, and NETs also degrade the glycocalyx and enhance endothelial permeability, resulting in endothelial barrier instability and further facilitating sepsis progression36. As core effector cells of the early inflammatory response in sepsis, neutrophils are activated and recruited to the kidney in the systemic inflammatory response, which not only act as an indicator and amplifier of the inflammatory response but also cause renal damage by obstructing microvessels and secreting toxic molecules (e.g., proteases, oxides, cytokines, NETs)37. Moreover, monocytes and neutrophils jointly initiate the inflammatory response. In the early stage of AKI, monocyte-derived macrophages release chemokines that recruit neutrophils to affected sites25worsen renal damage by promoting the inflammatory cell aggregation and the expression of inflammatory mediators, and also secrete exosomes that may be involved in the SA-AKI onset and progression38. The severity of sepsis may be associated with a reduction in monocyte counts, low monocyte counts may lead to out-of-control localized infections and affect prognosis, and the initial absolute monocyte count at admission is an independent factor influencing 28-d mortality in severe sepsis39. Platelets are also key to the resistance to infection and are implicated in immune promotion and coagulation activation40. Platelets interact with neutrophils to participate in the NET formation41and interact with antigen-presenting cells and T/B cells to regulate the immune response42. In the early stage of sepsis, by interacting with platelet hemostatic receptors (e.g. GPIIb/IIIa, GPIb) and immune receptors (e.g. FcγRIIa, TLRs), pathogens induce platelet activation, aggregation, and consumption, trigger systemic thrombosis, and obstruct the microvascular system, leading to ischemic injury to peripheral tissues and even organ failure. Platelet counts often increase in response to such platelet consumption, and thrombocytopenia occurs when the rate of platelet consumption exceeds that of production43. Moreover, platelet activation may play a role in AKI pathology44. Lymphocytes, important cells of the adaptive immune system, are involved in sepsis-induced immunosuppression45. Lymphopenia is a marker for sepsis-induced immunosuppression prominently characterized by apoptosis-induced early massive loss of lymphocytes and expansion of immunosuppressive cells (IL-10-producing B cells, regulatory T cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells). As a result, patients will die due to latent viral reactivation and susceptibility to secondary opportunistic infections46. Apoptosis of lymphocytes results in severe and persistent lymphopenia in septic shock, producing a poor prognosis47. In addition, lymphocytes also secrete cytokines to regulate inflammatory responses and induce kidney injury48. To sum up, the mechanism of AISI as a potential marker of SA-AKI prognosis has not been clarified, but it, integrating neutrophil, monocyte, platelet, and lymphocyte counts, can reflect more comprehensively and objectively the inflammatory changes.

This retrospective cohort study first revealed a J-shaped nonlinear relation of AISI with SA-AKI prognosis. However, some limitations are worth noting. First, the data were collected retrospectively. Second, no information on the site of infection and etiological examination results was reported. Third, only the value of AISI calculated first after admission rather than its changes during hospitalization was used, which was not necessarily the optimal time point for the study. Finally, selection bias is inevitable in this single-center retrospective study.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the significant impact of AISI on mortality in SA-AKI. AISI possesses an important predictive value in the SA-AKI prognosis, which serves as an efficient tool for prognostic evaluation in clinical practice and offers a theoretical basis for further optimizing the SA-AKI management strategy. The mortality in SA-AKI rises with the elevation of AISI when AISI > 450.117 × 1018/L. Quantitative stratification of AISI at admission may contribute to early detection and treatment of SA-AKI with a poor prognosis, but extensive prospective studies are still required to validate its clinical use.