Table 2 Comparison of the calculated and experimental vibrational spectra and proposal assignments of 2TSET.

From: Solvent-driven spectroscopic and quantum chemical evaluation of 2-[(trimethylsilyl) ethynyl]thiophene with molecular docking insights

Mode type & assignment

Observed FT-IR (cm-1)

Observed FT-Raman (cm-1)

Calculated (B3LYP/6-311 + G(d, p))

Calculated (B3LYP/6-311 + G(d,2p))

Major PED (%)

νCH aromatic

3106, 3091, 3078

3107

3112, 3080

3008, 3077

98

ν_as CH₃

3029–2852

2962, 2852

2966–2812

2960–2810

96–97

ν_s CH₃

2835, 2806, 2789

2791

2794–2790

2830–2790

96

νC = C aromatic

2147, 1513

2148, 1514

2150, 1520

2145, 1515

72–88

γCH₃

1419–1370

1425–1368

1420–1368

75–78

βCH₃

1350, 1330, 1299

1351

1372–1308

1352–1300

75–76

νSi–CH₃

1280, 1250, 1236

1251, 1236

1253–1238

1250–1235

75–78

δCH/νC–C mixed

1164, 1139

1164

1170–1145

1165–1140

75

δsbCH₃

1077, 1042

1078, 1044

1081, 1048

1080, 1045

76

δCH/νC–C mixed

942, 853

854

940, 857

854

68–74

νC–S

791, 759

756

798, 768

790, 760

72

γop rCH₃

732–685

733, 699

738–680

735–675

70–72

γC–Si/δC–Si

678–572

640, 571

680–578

675–572

63–70

Low-frequency modes

532–14

512, 416

527–12

512–12

48–54