Table 5 Comparison of optical parameters (\(\:{E}_{g},\:{E}_{edge},\frac{\text{N}}{{m}^{*}}\:,\:{n}_{o},\:{w}_{p},\:{\chi\:}^{\left(3\right)},\:\text{a}\text{n}\text{d}\:{n}_{2}\:\:\)) of PEO-GO composites from literature and the present study, highlighting the improved optical performance and potential for optoelectronic applications.
From: Improved optical characteristics of PEO polymer integrated with graphene oxide
\(\:{\varvec{E}}_{\varvec{g}}/\varvec{e}\varvec{V}\) | \(\:{\varvec{E}}_{\varvec{e}\varvec{d}\varvec{g}\varvec{e}}/\varvec{e}\varvec{V}\) | N/\(\:{\varvec{m}}^{\varvec{*}}\) | \(\:{\varvec{n}}_{\varvec{o}}\) | \(\:{\varvec{w}}_{\varvec{p}}\) | \(\:{\varvec{\chi\:}}^{\left(3\right)}\) | \(\:{\varvec{n}}_{2}\) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEO/Ag nano-composite57 | Indirect 2.12 | 3.54 | - | - | - | - | - |
PEO/4wt% SiO2 nanocomposites85 | 3.2 | - | \(\:0.79\times\:{10}^{55}\) | 1.35 | - | \(\:6.24\times\:{10}^{-14}\) | \(\:20.58\times\:{10}^{-12}\) |
PEO/PVA-MWCNTs/ZnO 9wt%86 | Indirect 3.57 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
PVA: PEO (80:20)/AlPO4 4wt%87 | Indirect 4.5 | 3.5 | - | - | - | - | - |
PEO/NiO56 | 3.07 | 2.5 | \(\:0.40\times\:{10}^{40}\) | 1.02 | \(\:0.12\times\:{10}^{14}\) | \(\:6\times\:{10}^{-19}\) | \(\:2\times\:{10}^{-17}\) |
(PEO/PVP)–15 wt% TiO288 | 4.73 | 4.94 | - | 2.03 | - | - | - |
PEO/PVP/CuONPs89 | 4.68 | 3.39 | - | 2.86 | - | - | - |
PEO/CaTiO3nanoparticles42 | 4.19 | 4.4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Present study | 2.12 | 2.27 | \(\:11.6\times\:{10}^{54}\) | 2.21 | \(\:{10.3\times\:10}^{13}\) | \(\:30\times\:{10}^{-6}\) | \(\:5.2\times\:{10}^{-5}\) |
