Table 16 Results of sensitivity analysis.

From: Optimal selection of SiC and TiO2 reinforced ZA27 hybrid nanocomposite exercising PSI approach under fuzzy environment for bearing application

Trial

Weights

PSI value (\(\:{\varvec{\theta\:}}_{\varvec{i}}\))

Ranking

A0

A1

A2

A3

1.

WC1−C9 = (0.0, 0.1, 0.2)

0.612

0.8372

0.6431

0.7717

A1 > A3 > A2> A0

2.

WC1−C9 = (0.1, 0.2, 0.3)

0.6311

0.8554

0.6614

0.8080

A1 > A3 > A2> A0

3.

WC1−C9 = (0.2, 0.35, 0.5)

0.6402

0.8679

0.6705

0.8137

A1 > A3 > A2> A0

4.

WC1−C9 = (0.4, 0.5, 0.6)

0.6448

0.8633

0.6832

0.8271

A1 > A3 > A2> A0

5.

WC1−C9 = (0.5, 0.65, 0.8)

0.6501

0.8598

0.6847

0.8254

A1 > A3 > A2> A0

6.

WC1−C9 = (0.7, 0.8, 0.9)

0.6674

0.8761

0.6910

0.8390

A1 > A3 > A2> A0

7.

WC1−C9 = (0.8, 0.9, 1.0)

0.6895

0.8843

0.7201

0.8553

A1 > A3 > A2> A0

8.

WC1 = (0.8, 0.9, 1.0), WC2−C9 = (0.0, 0.1, 0.2)

0.6239

0.8390

0.6431

0.7935

A1 > A3 > A2> A0

9.

WC2 = (0.8, 0.9, 1.0), WC1, C3−C9 = (0.0, 0.1, 0.2)

0.6433

0.8453

0.6521

0.8372

A1 > A3 > A2> A0

10.

WC3 = (0.8, 0.9, 1.0), WC1−C2, C4−C9 = (0.0, 0.1, 0.2)

0.6426

0.8457

0.6423

0.8470

A3 > A1 > A0> A2

11.

WC4 = (0.8, 0.9, 1.0), WC1−C3, C5−C9 = (0.0, 0.1, 0.2)

0.6618

0.8491

0.6364

0.8443

A1 > A3 > A0> A2

12.

WC5 = (0.8, 0.9, 1.0), WC1−C4, C6−C9 = (0.0, 0.1, 0.2)

0.6388

0.8511

0.6591

0.8552

A3 > A1 > A2> A0

13.

WC6 = (0.8, 0.9, 1.0), WC1−C5, C7−C9 = (0.0, 0.1, 0.2)

0.6451

0.8484

0.6604

0.8316

A1 > A3 > A2> A0

14.

WC7 = (0.8, 0.9, 1.0), WC1−C6, C8−C9 = (0.0, 0.1, 0.2)

0.6560

0.8432

0.6661

0.8364

A1 > A3 > A2> A0

15.

WC8 = (0.8, 0.9, 1.0), WC1−C7, C9 = (0.0, 0.1, 0.2)

0.6672

0.8317

0.6726

0.8521

A3 > A1 > A2> A0

16.

WC9 = (0.8, 0.9, 1.0), WC1−C8 = (0.0, 0.1, 0.2)

0.6525

0.8582

0.6444

0.8245

A1 > A3 > A0> A2

Back to article page