Table 1 Features and challenges of existing deep learning-based massive MIMO detection.
Author [citation] | Methodology | Features | Challenges |
---|---|---|---|
Yu et al.20 | AMIC-Net | It uses backwards propagation to learn input sequences more effectively It highly reduces the gradient vanishing | It struggles to manage the complex situation of massive MIMO |
Mahmoud et al.21 | MSDS | It highly minimizes the high computational complexity needed for the detection It reduces the energy required for the channel inference process | It does not detect non-coherent signals effectively It does not provide better accuracy because of the absence of encoding techniques |
Wei et al.22 | LcgNet | It highly reduces the cost required for the memory It eliminates the complexity of detecting signals | It requires more training data Operational costs are high |
Nigatu and Zhang23 | DNN | It effectively handles the penalty parameters to enhance the performance of the network It does not need technical computation to update the variables | Computational complexity is high |
Xu and Du24 | MLNet | It greatly reduces the computations required for the detection It has less complexity | It lacks in latency It suffers from packet loss |
Tan et al.25 | CHEMP | It provides high robustness It requires less training time | It is highly expensive It is not suitable for software implementation |
Liao et al.26 | DNN | It effectively manages the connection between each layer | It is difficult to process the data with a complex size |
Nguyen et al.27 | DNN and OAMP-Net | It provides high efficiency It could be reused for multiple detections | It needs more amount of data It does not consider the necessary information during training |