Table 2 (a) Genetic heterogeneity among the spectacled bears sampled in Pichincha (northern ecuador; n = 10) and in Loja and Zamora chinchipe (southern ecuador; n = 10) (identical Ecuadorian provinces analyzed by Cueva et al.62) for six mt genes. (b) genetic heterogeneity between the spectacled bears from all the 10 Ecuadorian provinces analyzed for complete mitogenomes and 43 specimens.

From: Effects of the Ecuadorian Andes on genetic structure of the spectacled bear with new genetic datasets

(a)

Genetic heterogeneity and gene

flow statistics

Values

Probabilities

χ2

18.000 df = 14

0.2068

HST

0.0372

0.0597

KST

0.0248

0.1144

KST*

0.0204

0.0888

ZS

93.633

0.2634

ZS*

4.2464

0.1179

Snn

0.6217

0.0661

GST

0.0354

0.0956

γST

0.0761

0.0396*

NST

0.0466

0.0455*

FST

0.0461

0.0461*

Nm (GST)

13.61

 

Nm (γST)

6.07

 

Nm (NST)

10.24

 

Nm (FST)

10.34

 

(b)

Genetic heterogeneity and gene

flow statistics

Values

Probabilities

χ2

98.130 df = 87

0.1948

HST

0.0058

0.2219

KST

0.1464

0.00001**

KST*

0.0714

0.00051**

ZS

301.3595

0.00001**

ZS*

5.3947

0.00200**

Snn

0.4948

0.00780**

GST

0.0176

0.1896

γST

0.2197

0.0156*

NST

0.2437

0.00941**

FST

0.2425

0.00976**

Nm (GST)

27.94

 

Nm (γST)

1.78

 

Nm (NST)

Nm (FST)

1.55

1.56

 
  1. * P < = 0.05; ** P < 0.01.