Table 1 A roadmap for the implementation of organisational change during a healthcare crisis, based on qualitative research conducted in 2021 among 26 nurses at the University Hospital in Krakow, Poland.

From: Nurses crisis management during COVID-19 at individual and organizational levels in a qualitative single centre study in Poland

Phase of implementation of organisational change

Expected results

COVID-19 pandemic, obtained results

Preparedness for crises

 Functioning of an employee

  BM: Concerns regarding lack of information, personal situation, change implementation

Anxiety, uncertainty, concerns related to the admission of the first patient and entering the zone where the COVID-19 infected patients are located

 The functioning of a team/organization

  JM: Planning process, systems & manuals; training simulations (e.g. establishing ownership within the process, resources allocation, testing, live simulations)

Employees recognized the uncertainty and preparations as “organisational chaos” due to the reorganisation of wards and the fluctuating introduction of procedures. The issue was the frequent changes in clear procedures rather than the procedures themselves

Crisis prevention

 The functioning of an employee

  BM: Concerns regarding personal situation, the way change is introduced, long-term consequences of the change

Denial was absent; only shock and mobilisation were reported, alongside awareness of the situation’s severity. Concerns about crisis management continued, such as frequent procedural changes, and respondents felt unsupported by expected figures like infection prevention nurses and doctors

 The functioning of a team/organization

  JM: Early warning, scanning; Issue & risk management, emergency response (e.g. audits, social forecasting, prioritisation, strategy development, training)

Respondents highlighted the lack of support from an infection prevention nurse and emphasized the need for a safety standard due to high nurse turnover and disconnection among staff in the Covid-19 zone

Late deployment / post-crisis management

 The functioning of an employee

  BM: Concerns regarding long-term consequences of the change, scope of cooperation in implementation phase

Withdrawal, adaptation, no acceptance of the existing situation. The emergence of routine, focus on work and patients, reduced concerns regarding the knowledge one has

 The functioning of a team/organization

  JM: Recovery, business resumption; post-crisis issue impact; evaluation & modification (e.g., operational recovery, media scrutiny, root cause analysis)

Resolving current problems faster and reorganising work toward a more efficient functioning. The feeling of growing conflicts among the nurses (the former ‘unity in the face of danger’ disappears)

Consolidating the positive effects of change/ crisis incident management

 The functioning of an employee

  BM: Concerns regarding cooperation in the implementation of the change and about the possibility of improving the effects of the change

Anti-infection procedures are deemed useful and worth promoting. Acceptance surfaces, previously absent. Internalization happens: mask-wearing and hand hygiene are emphasized as essential standards. Negative statements are neutralized with counteracting elements

 The functioning of a team/organization

  JM: Crisis recognition; system activation response; crisis management (e.g. transition from emergency, objective assessment, effective mechanism of call out, damage mitigation, stakeholder management, media response)

Statements on work organization, disinfectants supply, and procedure validity. Concerns about fatigue, post-COVID duty division, current working hours, and feeling unappreciated

  1. BM, Blanchard model23; JM, Jaques’ model16.