Table 3 Comparative evaluation of the E-spun NFs-based TF-SPME/UV-Vis methodology with other documented studies.

From: Reusable nanofibrous adsorbent functionalized with MIL-101(Fe)/Graphene oxide for Azo dye remediation from textile effluents: functionalization, kinetics, and mechanism insights

Dye

Sample

matrix

Extraction procedure

(Sorbent amount)

Analysis method

Solvent

Adsorption time (min)

LDR

(mg L−1)

LOD

(mg L−1)

LOQ

(mg L−1)

Qm (mg g−1, from Langmuir)

RSD%

R2

Ref.

CR

Pork &

water samples

(5 g)

COF-SPE

(20 mg)

HPLC-PDA

MeOH

(8.0 mL)

120

1.0–100.0

0.34

1.0

284.10

0.18–6.64

> 0.9990

79

CR

Water & beverage samples

(2 mL)

COF-D-µ-SPE

(4 mg)

HPLC-PDA

EtOH

(2.0 mL)

60

0.1–200.0

0.05

0.1

166.94

0.44–5.79

> 0.9980

80

MO

Seawater samples

(10 mL)

MG-PT-SPE

(2 mg)

UV-Vis

5% HOAc in EtOH

(250.0 µL)

80

0.005–0.25

0.001

0.005

-

2.30–3.10

0.9819

81

MO

Seawater samples

(4 mL)

MIP-PT-µSPE

(2 mg)

HPLC-PDA

0.5 M HCl

(200.0 µL)

20

0.0005–0.25

0.00012

0.0005

-

1.20–5.40

0.9928

82

MO

Textile industry wastewater samples

(10 mL)

E-spun NFs-TF-SPME

(0.5 mg)

UV-Vis

0.5 M HCl

(1.0 mL)

15

0.05–3.0

0.017

0.05

117.647

2.52–4.19

0.9952

This study

CR

0.05–3.0

0.026

0.05

113.636

2.69–4.60

0.9982

Back to article page