Table 1 Materials for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses used in this study.

From: Effects of restorative material on the mechanical performance of three-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with bilateral cantilevers: an in vitro study

Material

Flexural strength (MPa)

E-modulus (GPa)

CAD-Tempa

90 ±1

2.8

Telio CADb

185 ±17

3.2

PEEKa

178 ±3

3.6

5Y-TZP ceramicc

618 ±58

210

3Y-TZP ceramicc

842 ±72

210

  1. aAlmogbel L, Sadid-Zadeh R, Örgev A, Çakmak G, Li R. Flexural strength, surface roughness, and biofilm formation of ceramic-reinforced PEEK: An in vitro comparative study. J Prosthodont. 2023 Dec 6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13815. Online ahead of print.
  2. bStawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M, Güth JF. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;55:1–11.
  3. cLümkemann N, Stawarczyk B. Impact of hydrothermal aging on the light transmittance and flexural strength of colored yttria-stabilized zirconia materials of different formulations. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(3):518–526.
Back to article page