Abstract
Mine tailings are an unavoidable waste generated during iron ore mining operations, of which millions of tonnes are generated worldwide. Given the importance of steel, and therefore, iron ore mining, solutions are needed to recover this waste. Despite global efforts, the current proposed solutions struggle to reach the market due to cost-effectiveness issues. This study explores a potential solution, presenting iron tailings as a viable, economical, and sustainable material for thermal energy storage systems. Thermal characterization showed a specific heat capacity of 780–990 J/kg·K up to 590 °C. The material remained thermally stable without melting or decomposition up to 1000 °C, and the resulting storage density was estimated up to 450 kWh/m3. The material stands up safety, minimal environmental impact, and favourable thermophysical properties at a low investment cost. This innovative application not only addresses energy challenges but also contributes to resolving the waste management crisis in the iron mining industry.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Steel is the main material used in construction, manufacturing, transportation, and many other sectors, making iron ore and iron mining a critical activity for economic, social and technological development and infrastructure projects worldwide. Iron ore accounted for 94% of the metals mined in 2023, with 2,500 million tonnes extracted (Fig. 1b)1. Furthermore, iron ore is produced worldwide. According to statistics, Australia constitutes the world’s largest producer of iron ore2 (Fig. 1a).
However, mining operations result in the production of massive volumes of waste materials, including mine tailings produced during ore beneficiation3. The accumulation of iron mine tailing is an environmental problem that has been widely discussed, mainly due to the vast quantities generated annually. The global production of iron ore tailings in mining industry was estimated at 1.4 billion tonnes of tailings per year4,5,6 (Fig. 1c). Achieving sustainable growth while addressing environmental concerns is paramount.
(a) Iron ore main producers (Map generated using Microsoft Excel, version 16.0. Available at: https://www.microsoft.com/excel). (b) Metals production worldwide in 2023. (c) Iron tailings generation per year (Figure prepared by the authors using data from references1,2,4).
Numerous studies have analysed the used of iron ore tailings in different applications7,8. Open literature suggest that iron ore tailings can be converted into different types of ceramics9,10,11: tiles, glass, bricks, etc., including structural or functional materials such as cement, concrete12,13,14,15 or road materials16,17,18. Most studies focus on civil engineering, but despite the growing body of research, many proposed solutions fail to penetrate the market to limited low cost-effectiveness. Consequently, there is an increasing tendency to diversify and look for other environmental applications in different fields19,20,21,22. In this way, this paper proposes a novel application of iron mining tailings in the energy storage sector, to solve two major problems in two major industries.
Renewable energy sources, particularly solar and wind, face the challenge of intermittent generation, heavily reliant on resource availability23. Energy storage systems are thus pivotal for enabling the widespread adoption of renewable energy by mitigating supply-demand imbalances24.
There are different types of energy storage solutions that can be classified into five main groups: electrochemical (batteries), electrical, thermal, chemical and mechanical energy storage systems25. High temperature thermal energy storage (TES) promising solution for large-scale energy storage, offering higher load capacity and longer storage duration compared to battery technologies26.
TES technologies, categorized into sensible heat, latent heat or thermochemical reactions, find applications in seasonal and bulk energy storage27. The last two are not yet mature, compared to sensible heat storage technology that is the most widely used system in large-scale concentrated solar power plants worldwide28. This technology is based on the ability of materials to heat up and cool down. The thermal energy is employed to increase the temperature of a material (liquid or solid, e.g., water, sand, molten salts, rocks…) that is later cooled down to recover the energy29. In comparison with the other two thermal storage technologies, sensible-thermal storage systems have relatively low capital costs30.
The quantity of energy stored is mainly determined by the specific thermal capacity of the material. According to Khare et al.31 appropriate material requires:
-
Thermophysical properties: small density changes versus temperature, high heat capacity and heat transport properties.
-
Chemical properties: chemical stability, non-toxic, non-flammable, low potential reactivity.
-
Economic properties: abundant materials with low cost of manufacturing into suitable shapes.
The highest commercially viable materials for sensible heat storage applications are water and different mixtures of molten salts32. Nevertheless, this storage system has many drawbacks related to the use of molten salts, particularly the relatively high cost of the storage components.
As fossil fuel resources diminish and environmental policies evolve, the development of innovative, cost-effective, and efficient TES systems has become imperative for achieving global energy sustainability. Thus, the search for new low-cost storage materials is pivotal in attaining cost-effective thermal storage alternatives. Furthermore, the availability of storage material in sufficient quantity is a key factor. Lack of availability or even a conflict over the end use of the TES material can lead to price fluctuations and puts the development of storage systems at risk.
The characteristics of the materials to be used have been extensively studied, but environmental aspects are often given less consideration in the selection of a storage material. Leveraging various industrial by-products as heat storage materials presents a viable approach with a dual objective: obtaining a viable and cost-effective TES material while reducing mining environmental impact.
Several solutions have been proposed in this filed such as inert ceramics obtained from the treatment of the asbestos waste (Cofalit)33, fly ashes from the incineration of municipal solid waste34 or ashes from coal-fired thermal power plants35.
This study proposes iron tailings, which is one of the main wastes of the mining industry, as a heat storage material. Introducing iron tailings into the energy recovery or production sectors opens new avenues for valorising this waste material while addressing pressing environmental and energy challenges.
Materials and methods
Approximately 20 kg of iron ore tailings were collected from an iron mine in Canada, where tailings are subjected to a crushing, grinding, magnetic separation and drying process as part of the operation. This desiccation step, commonly implemented to reduce water content, enhances storage safety, geotechnical stability, and facilitates subsequent handling. The resulting material consists of a fine, dry residue, which was used as the basis for the analyses carried out in this work. The material was homogenized and quartered to prepare representative samples.
An experimental design program for this research project was developed to achieve the presented objectives (Fig. 2). A full testing campaign was executed to provide an exhaustive physicochemical and thermal characterisation of the tailings.
Physicochemical analysis
Iron tailings were characterized in terms of chemical composition (X-ray fluorescence, XRF) and physical properties (permeability, particle size distribution and density).
XRF is an elemental, semi-quantitative analysis technique based on the ability of atoms to absorb energy from a source of X-ray radiation. As a consequence, secondary X-rays are emitted, which will have an intensity proportional to the concentration of each element. The equipment used in this case is the ARL-ADVANT-XP.
The permeability coefficient of iron tailings was determined using a constant load perimeter in which the vertical flow of water through a test tube is laminar according to ISO 17892-11:2019. Particle size distribution was obtained by sieving iron tailings (ISO 17892-4:2016) and density and porosity was determined according to ISO 17892-3:2015 as the ratio between the dry mass of the soil and the volume of solids, the latter being measured using a pycnometer with water.
Thermal properties
For thermal properties, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential thermal analysis (DTA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were performed using a simultaneous TGA/DTA and TGA/DSC thermal analyser (SETARAM TG-DSC Setsys).
Thermogravimetry is based on the measurement of the change in mass of a sample when subjected to a change in temperature in a controlled atmosphere. In a DTA, both the sample and a reference material, which is thermally, physically and chemically inert, are subjected to a temperature variation.
Thermogravimetry and calorimetry analysis are thermal analytical techniques in which the difference in the amount of heat required to increase the temperature of a sample and a reference is measured as a function of temperature. TGA was performed from room temperature to 1000 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min, in an air atmosphere. DSC was conducted from room temperature up to 1000 °C, heating speed of 10 °C/min and in argon atmosphere to avoid reactive effects such as oxidation or combustion when using air. To ensure the representativeness of the results, 100 mg of material were used for the analysis.
Results and discussion
Physicochemical analysis
The iron tailings examined in this work are mainly composed of silica (SiO2) along with significant iron oxides, primarily of Fe2O3, and alumina Al2O3. Minor quantities of calcium (CaO) and magnesium (MgO) can appear depending on the mineralogy of the source ore, but overall, the material is relatively inert chemically.
Figure 3 compares the tailings composition to those form other regions, confirming that while the SiO2 ratio varies with ore type, iron tailings generally consist of silicate minerals similar to natural rock or ceramic materials. On the other hand, Fe₂O₃ proportion is relatively higher. It should be noted that XRF results are expressed as Fe₂O₃ equivalent, which reflects the total iron content in oxide form and does not directly identify the mineral phases. Nevertheless, considering the beneficiation route of the sampled ore (crushing, grinding, and magnetic separation), hematite (Fe₂O₃) and magnetite (Fe₃O₄) are the most likely Fe-bearing phases.
Tailings analysed in this study have very fine size (d50 in the silt range) with 44.9% of void content in the as-received dry state. The particle–size distribution curve of tailings as received is shown in Fig. 4.
This fine granulometry leads to a relatively low permeability (5.04 × 10−7 m/s), slightly lower than that of coarse packed-bed materials, which could influence heat transfer fluid flow in a thermal storage unit. Despite the fineness, the tailings exhibit a high bulk density of 2,948 kg/m3. This high density is advantageous for volumetric energy storage since a cubic meter of iron tailings will weigh more and thus store more energy (for a given temperature rise) than a cubic meter of lighter material like concrete or rock36. Regarding the mean flow (0.0138 mL/s), hydraulic gradient (6.90 m/m) and permeability coefficient (5.04 × 10−7 m/s) obtained, they report slightly lower values than conventional materials.
Thermal properties
In order to determine the thermal stability of the iron tailings, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed from room temperature up to 1000 °C. Figure 5a shows the measured mass difference obtained from the experiments as a function of temperature. The TGA results are usually presented as ‘mass loss’ (TG%) since, at the beginning of the test, the balance is tared to 0 and the losses of mass are represented by negative values from this initial point with a minimum value of −100% which would correspond to the total decomposition of the sample.
As can be seen, there is a slight mass loss of about 1.5% over the entire temperature range. An initial rapid mass loss occurs below 150 °C due to desorption of residual moisture, after which the mass remains nearly constant with only minor fluctuations up to 1000 °C. From this point onwards, the loss may be related to the oxidation-reduction reactions that take place when the material is heated. Many elements in the materials can potentially be oxidised, such as metal oxides (at higher oxidation rates), and/or may remain as trace metals in the tailings. However, no significant decomposition or reacting-away of the material was observed, even in an oxidative atmosphere, indicating that the tailings are thermally stable at least to 1000 °C with essentially no volatile content.
This thermal stability is a key requirement for sensible heat storage media, essential for long term durability in thermal cycling applications. Iron tailings behavior is on par with other inert solid TES materials stated in literature. For example, vitrified waste products like Cofalit® are reported to be stable even up to 1200°C37 or natural basaltic rocks and glasses can also sustain high temperatures with minimal degradation38.
Figure 5b shows the DSC curves representing the power-energy (mW) variation as a function of temperature. The curve reveals additional insight into phase transitions. An endothermic peak appears at around 590 °C. Nevertheless, this endotherm is not accompanied by any mass loss in the TGA, implying it is due to a solid-state phase transformation (solid-solid or solid-liquid (melting)) rather than decomposition.
A likely interpretation is the α–β quartz inversion. Quartz (SiO2) is the major component of these tailings and undergoes a well-known crystalline transition at approximately 573 °C, wherein the low-temperature α-quartz shifts to a β-quartz structure39. This transition is reversible and entails a volume expansion on the order of 5–8%39. In materials like granite, the α→β quartz conversion around 573 °C can induce microcracking due to the sudden expansion. In the iron tailings DSC, the smooth endotherm at around 590 °C suggests the material absorbs heat for this internal reorganization.
Following this, a slight exothermic drift is observed above 600 °C which likely indicates that the new high-temperature phase is undergoing continuous structural adjustment (crystallization of a metastable amorphous fraction into a more stable crystalline phase), releasing some heat in the process. By 800 °C, the exothermic contribution becomes pronounced as evidenced by a net downturn in the apparent DSC curve. This phenomenon is essentially the material giving back heat (exothermic) as it further stabilizes its internal structure. Importantly, these thermal events cause no deleterious effects on the material’s integrity since the sample remained physically intact, and the total mass change was negligible.
The quartz phase inversion is a reversible process, and the subsequent slow exothermic crystallization indicates the tailings develop a stable high-temperature phase without disintegration. No melting or irreversible phase decomposition was detected up to 1000 °C. This finding is positive, as some phase transitions (like certain polymorphic changes in ceramics40 can lead to thermal shock or material damage, but the iron tailings display a robust tolerance to the internal changes at 590 °C.
The specific heat was derived from the DSC data and is showed in Fig. 5c. From room temperature up to 590 °C, the tailings exhibit a roughly constant heat capacity (790–990 J/kg K). From this temperature, a clear decrease is observed, directly tied to the exothermic structural change. The material is releasing heat in that regime, the DSC records a reduced net heat input required to raise its temperature, which mathematically manifests as a lower (even slightly negative) incremental heat capacity. However, the material continues to absorb energy as it heats further, but the exothermic contribution complicates its interpretation. Once the transformation is essentially complete (above 800 °C), the net heat capacity returns to a small positive value, although the exotherm still partially offsetting the sensible heat uptake. The maximum specific heat is recorded from 300 °C with values around 990 J/kg K.
This behavior means the material will undergo an internal exothermic event during initial heating in the 600–800 °C range, which could help the charging of the thermal store by releasing a bit of extra heat. Aside from this transient, the iron tailings show a stable and usable specific heat capacity across the relevant temperature window.
These values are consistent with the expected contributions of the main oxides identified by XRF. Magnetite (Fe₃O₄) generally exhibits higher cₚ values, while hematite (Fe₂O₃) and other oxides contribute in the lower range. Since XRF reports total iron as Fe₂O₃ equivalent, it is not possible to distinguish directly between phases in this study. Nevertheless, the observed cₚ behaviour can be reasonably explained by the combined effect of silicate phases (SiO₂, Al₂O₃, etc.) and Fe-oxides. A more precise quantification of the phase contributions would require mineralogical analysis (e.g., XRD) and the application of the Neumann–Kopp rule to calculate a theoretical bulk heat capacity as the weighted sum of the specific heats of the individual phases.
Regarding the thermal conductivity of iron tailings was measured from room temperature up to 450 °C (Fig. 6). From the density and specific heat data thermal diffusivity (α) values were obtained following the next Eq. (1):
Where λ is the thermal conductivity (W/mK), \(\:\rho\:\) is the density (g/cm3) and Cs (J/g K) is the specific heat capacity.
An interval of maximum stability is observed between 100 and 275 °C, with minimal variation in conductivity. This trend is consistent with the thermograms. The endothermic event around 590 °C and the subsequent exothermic drift reflect internal rearrangements in the silicate framework that can subtly alter solid–solid contact networks within the granular matrix, reducing the effective heat-conduction pathways. The observed decrease in λ and α beyond 300 °C implies slower transient heat penetration through individual grains and contacts. Quantitatively, the tailings exhibit low effective conductivity (0.10–0.25 W/mK in the studied range) which is attributable to the fine particle size and pore spaces in the tailings. While this could lead to steeper temperature gradients within a bulk bed of tailings during charging-discharging cycles, it is not necessarily a limitation.
Thermal diffusivity is a measure of how quickly a material reacts to temperature changes. Materials with a high thermal diffusivity will heat or cool quickly; conversely, substances with a low thermal diffusivity will heat or cool slowly. Thus, thermal diffusivity is an important property when considering unsteady-state heat transfer situations, that is, in the charge-discharge cycles. It can be seen in both cases that there is a noticeable decrease in conductivity and diffusivity from 300 °C onwards.
The results show very promising iron tailings properties for use as thermal energy storage material. Furthermore, the TGA analysis carried out demonstrated shows that there is hardly any mass variation, which ensures the thermal stability of iron tailings in a wide temperature range up to 1000 °C. The net effect is a high energy-per-volume with a conservative heat-transfer rate through the solid phase, indicating the high suitability of this mining waste for TES technologies.
Comparison of iron tailings with other TES materials
Once the technical feasibility of iron tailings has been discussed, a comparison with other TES materials commonly used is presented (Table 1). Molten salt, concrete, sand, cast steel, NaCl and crushed rock are the most common solid sensible thermal energy storage materials, but the table also shows other residues that have been analysed as TES material such as EAF slag or fly ashes.
The specific heat capacity of the iron tailings (780–990 J/kg·K in the tested range) is similar to those of common solid media currently in use. Silica sand typically offers 710–900 J/kg·K, and concrete around 850–920 J/kg·K, so the tailings fall comfortably within this band. They also match well with other waste-derived candidates, such as electric arc furnace (EAF) slag from the steel industry (900–950 J/kg·K) and Cofalit® (800–1030 J/kg·K). On a mass basis, therefore, iron tailings can store heat as effectively as these alternative materials. In terms of density, iron tailings (2948 kg/m3) are denser than other common materials, such as natural rock (11500–2800 kg/m3) or molten salts (1870–2600 kg/m3), approaching that of processed ceramics Cofalit® (3120 kg/m3) or fly ashes (2962 kg/m3).
One area where iron tailings differ markedly from most other materials is in thermal conductivity. Because the tailings in this study are used in a dry, powdery form with significant porosity, their effective thermal conductivity is quite lower than other waste-based materials like EAF slag (1.3–1.5 W/m·K in the 200–600 °C range)37. Many packed-bed TES systems actually operate with filler materials (rocks, ceramics) that also have moderate thermal conductivity, relying on the heat transfer fluid to carry energy through the bed54. Although iron tailings have low thermal conductivity, they deliver high heat capacity and density, which can be advantageous if the storage system is designed to mitigate the conduction limits (for example, by ensuring good convective heat transfer with the fluid).
The specific heat and density properties enable the calculation of total energy stored (Q) as follows (2):
Where \(\:\rho\:\) is the density (kg/cm3), Cs (J/kg K) is the specific heat capacity and ΔT the temperature interval. Figure 7 presents a comparison between the energy stored (at 573 K) in each of the materials and the energy cost. Data for reference materials were obtained from Table 1 (literature values), while the values for iron tailings correspond to the experimental results of this work.
The cost of the waste has been taken as 0, assuming only transport costs are necessary. For the calculation, the maximisation of stored energy along with the minimization of total material cost have been considered as criteria. These results represent the theoretical minimum value, as the calculation does not account for practical thermal storage issues such as charge/discharge conditions, heat losses, and other parameters.
As can be seen, iron tailings have a highly competitive performance. A preliminary estimate indicates the potential for a reduction of about 3 times the total cost of the current most used storage material (molten salts), which could lead to a significant cost reduction in the storage system and thus to a reduction of the LCOE (levelized cost of electricity). The performance of iron tailings is similar to Cofalit which is also cheap (8 €/t) although when it is treated by plasma torch, its price increases to (1200 €/t)33.
Conclusions
Mine tailings are an unavoidable waste generated during iron ore mining operations, of which millions of tonnes are generated worldwide. Given the importance of steel, and therefore of iron ore mining, solutions are needed to recover this waste. On the other hand, research and development studies on thermal energy storage materials are a hot topic among the research community, particularly those focusing on sensible heat storage materials. Numerous scientists have worked on TES materials and their respective technologies. In this study, thermophysical and chemical characterization of iron tailings from the mining industry has been performed for its potential use as material for thermal storage systems.
Up to temperatures of 590 °C no change in the internal structure or phase transition of the material was noted, a temperature range within the normal working spectrum for other commonly used materials, such as molten salts. In cases requiring higher temperatures, more specific testing would be necessary, as the present analysis cannot ascertain whether the endothermic peak around 600 °C indicates a solid-solid or solid-liquid phase change.
Compared to materials currently in use, the heat capacity is medium (0.78–0.99 J/K-g) although the thermal conductivity is low (0.12–0.25 W/mK). According to the results obtained, each m3 of iron tailing has a storage capacity up to 464.53 kWh (assuming the highest measured specific heat capacity is used in the calculations) at very low cost, involving only the transport of the material. Replacing molten salt with iron tailings would mean a reduction of approximately 2.5 €/kWh.
This study opens up a new potential market for the valorisation of the iron tailings produced linked to the field of renewable energies that no one had yet considered. This article sets out the first steps of the research, with future lines of development analysing the appropriate equipment for the incorporation of iron tailings and their viability on a pilot scale. In addition, future work should include a detailed mineralogical characterization to identify the specific phases (such as hematite or magnetite) and to better correlate the mineral composition with the measured thermophysical properties.
The implementation of this environmentally friendly alternative would reduce the need to exploit natural resources, which in turn would lead to environmental and economic savings. It would also give a second life to a waste that is produced in large quantities worldwide, in line with the principles of the circular economy. Finally, the recovery of iron tailings would avoid the disposal of a huge amount of this industrial waste, which also entails significant environmental risks depending on the conditions of deposition. In the face of new climate trends, production should be reduced to the minimum necessary, and the reuse and recycling of elements that cannot be returned to the environment due to their properties should be encouraged.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed in this study.
References
Ritchie, H. & Rosado, P. Metals and Minerals. Our World in Data (2024).
Nasdaq, Top 10 Iron Ore-producing Countries. https://investingnews.com/daily/resource-investing/base-metals-investing/iron-investing/top-iron-producing-countries/?utm_source=nasdaq&utm_medium=syndication (2024).
Bose, B. P. Valorization of iron ore tailing (IOT) waste through the circular economy concept: A sustainable solution towards mitigation of resource crisis and climate change. Int. J. Earth Sci. Knowl. Appl. 5, 309–316 (2023).
Saldanha, R. B. et al. Potential use of iron ore tailings for binder production: A life cycle assessment. Constr. Build. Mater. 365, 130008 (2023).
Carmignano, O. et al. Iron ore tailings: characterization and applications. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. https://doi.org/10.21577/0103-5053.20210100 (2021).
Levandoski, W. M. K., Ferrazzo, S. T., Bruschi, G. J., Consoli, N. C. & Korf, E. P. Mechanical and microstructural properties of iron mining tailings stabilized with alkali-activated binder produced from agro-industrial wastes. Sci. Rep. 13, 15754 (2023).
Araujo, F. S. M., Taborda-Llano, I., Nunes, E. B. & Santos, R. M. Recycling and reuse of mine tailings: A review of advancements and their implications. Geosciences 12, 319 (2022).
Kumar, G. S., Sharma, A., Tripathi, D. P. & Nema, A. K. Towards Sustainable Iron Ore Tailings Management (Exploiting Versatile Reuse Opportunities for Environmental and Economic Benefits, 2024).
de Freitas, S. M. A. C., Sousa, L. N., Diniz, P., Martins, M. E. & Assis, P. S. Steel slag and iron ore tailings to produce solid brick. Clean. Techn Environ. Policy. 20, 1087–1095 (2018).
Kuranchie, F. A., Shukla, S. K. & Habibi, D. Utilisation of iron ore mine tailings for the production of geopolymer bricks. Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 30, 92–114 (2016).
Hk, T. & Hossiney, N. A short review on environmental impacts and application of iron ore tailings in development of sustainable eco-friendly bricks. Materials Today: Proceedings 61 327–331 (2022).
de Fernandes, L. et al. Iron Ore Tailing as Addition to Partial Replacement of Portland Cement. 930 (2018).
Uchechukwu, E. A. & Ezekiel, M. J. Evaluation of the iron ore tailings from Itakpe in Nigeria as concrete material. Adv. Mater. 3, 27 (2014).
Adiguzel, D., Tuylu, S. & Eker, H. Utilization of tailings in concrete products: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 360, 129574 (2022).
Zhao, J., Ni, K., Su, Y. & Shi, Y. An evaluation of iron ore tailings characteristics and iron ore tailings concrete properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 286, 122968 (2021).
Silva, G. C. et al. Julia Castro Mendes, & Ricardo Andrés Fiorotti Peixoto. Using Iron Ore Tailings from Tailing Dams as Road Material. J. Mater. Civil Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001613 (2016).
B J, P. & Ravi Shankar, A. U. A study on utilization of iron ore tailings as partial replacement for fine aggregates in the construction of rigid pavements. (2017).
Wei, Z. et al. Utilization of iron ore tailing as an alternative mineral filler in asphalt mastic: High-temperature performance and environmental aspects. J. Clean. Prod. 335, 130318 (2022).
Galvão, J. L. B., Andrade, H. D., Brigolini, G. J., Peixoto, R. A. F. & Mendes, J. C. Reuse of iron ore tailings from tailings dams as pigment for sustainable paints. J. Clean. Prod. 200, 412–422 (2018).
Wan, R. et al. The experimental study on thermal conductivity of backfill material of ground source heat pump based on iron tailings. Energy Build. 174, 1–12 (2018).
Han, X. et al. Recycling of iron ore tailings into magnetic nanoparticles and nanoporous materials for the remediation of water, air and soil: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 21, 1005–1028 (2023).
Wei, M. et al. Maximizing the pozzolanic potential of superfine iron tailings for low-carbon stabilization: application of high-calcium geopolymer. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 198, 107198 (2023).
Zhou, Y., Min, C., Wang, K., Xie, L. & Fan, Y. Optimization of integrated energy systems considering seasonal thermal energy storage. J. Energy Storage. 71, 108094 (2023).
Sadeghi, G. Energy storage on demand: thermal energy storage development, materials, design, and integration challenges. Energy Storage Mater. 46, 192–222 (2022).
Kebede, A. A., Kalogiannis, T., Van Mierlo, J. & Berecibar, M. A comprehensive review of stationary energy storage devices for large scale renewable energy sources grid integration. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 159, 112213 (2022).
Alva, G., Liu, L., Huang, X. & Fang, G. Thermal energy storage materials and systems for solar energy applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 68, 693–706 (2017).
Sarbu, I., Sebarchievici, C. A. & Comprehensive Rev. Therm. Energy Storage Sustainability 10, 191 (2018).
El Alami, K., Asbik, M. & Agalit, H. Identification of natural rocks as storage materials in thermal energy storage (TES) system of concentrated solar power (CSP) plants – A review. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 217, 110599 (2020).
Alonso, E. & Rojas, E. Air solid packed-beds for high temperature thermal storage: practical recommendations for predicting their thermal behaviour. Appl. Therm. Eng. 202, 117835 (2022).
Stadler, I., Hauer, A. & Bauer, T. Thermal energy storage. In Handbook of Energy Storage: Demand, Technologies, Integration (eds Sterner, M. & Stadler, I.) 563–609 (Springer, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55504-0_10.
Khare, S., Dell’Amico, M., Knight, C. & McGarry, S. Selection of materials for high temperature sensible energy storage. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 115, 114–122 (2013).
Gutierrez, A. et al. Advances in the valorization of waste and by-product materials as thermal energy storage (TES) materials. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 59, 763–783 (2016).
Kocak, B., Fernandez, A. I. & Paksoy, H. Benchmarking study of demolition wastes with different waste materials as sensible thermal energy storage. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 219, 110777 (2021).
Setoodeh Jahromy, S. et al. Fly Ash from municipal solid waste incineration as a potential thermochemical energy storage material. Energy Fuels. 33, 5810–5819 (2019).
Yin, T., Huang, X., Yao, S. & Li, G. Thermal energy utilization of high temperature ash: current situation and prospects. BioRes 18, 4866–4883 (2023).
Reddy Prasad, D. M. et al. A critical review on thermal energy storage materials and systems for solar applications. AIMS Energy. 7, 507–526 (2019).
Py, X. et al. Thermal storage for solar power plants based on low cost recycled material. Effstock Conference Proceedings. (2009).
Liu, J. et al. Exploration of basalt glasses as High-Temperature sensible heat storage materials. ACS Omega. 5, 19236–19246 (2020).
Shen, Y., Xin, H., Yuan, J., Shaofei, W. & chunhu, Z. Thermal cracking characteristics of high-temperature granite suffering from different cooling shocks. International J. Fracture https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-020-00470-2 (2020).
Dal Bó, M. et al. Influence of beta-to-alpha quartz transition on residual stresses of a feldspar glass matrix composite: A relationship with catastrophic fracture due to thermal shock. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 43, 4562–4572 (2023).
Zhou, H., Lai, Z. & Cen, K. Experimental study on energy storage performances of packed bed with different solid materials. Energy 246, 123416 (2022).
Grosu, Y. et al. Natural and by-product materials for thermocline-based thermal energy storage system at CSP plant: structural and thermophysical properties. Appl. Therm. Eng. 136, 185–193 (2018).
Lizana, J., Chacartegui, R., Barrios-Padura, A. & Valverde, J. M. Advances in thermal energy storage materials and their applications towards zero energy buildings: A critical review. Appl. Energy. 203, 219–239 (2017).
Ortega-Fernández, I. et al. Thermophysical characterization of a by-product from the steel industry to be used as a sustainable and low-cost thermal energy storage material. Energy 89, 601–609 (2015).
Özrahat, E. & Ünalan, S. Thermal performance of a concrete column as a sensible thermal energy storage medium and a heater. Renew. Energy. 111, 561–579 (2017).
Vigneshwaran, K., Sodhi, G. S., Muthukumar, P., Guha, A. & Senthilmurugan, S. Experimental and numerical investigations on high temperature cast steel based sensible heat storage system. Appl. Energy. 251, 113322 (2019).
Gautam, A. & Saini, R. P. A review on sensible heat based packed bed solar thermal energy storage system for low temperature applications. Sol. Energy. 207, 937–956 (2020).
Prasad, L. & Muthukumar, P. Design and optimization of lab-scale sensible heat storage prototype for solar thermal power plant application. Sol. Energy. 97, 217–229 (2013).
Bruch, A., Fourmigué, J. F. & Couturier, R. Experimental and numerical investigation of a pilot-scale thermal oil packed bed thermal storage system for CSP power plant. Sol. Energy. 105, 116–125 (2014).
Hasnain, S. M. Review on sustainable thermal energy storage technologies, part I: heat storage materials and techniques. Energy. Conv. Manag. 39, 1127–1138 (1998).
Calvet, N. et al. Compatibility of a post-industrial ceramic with nitrate molten salts for use as filler material in a thermocline storage system. Appl. Energy. 109, 387–393 (2013).
Tiskatine, R. et al. Suitability and characteristics of rocks for sensible heat storage in CSP plants. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 169, 245–257 (2017).
Meffre, A. et al. Design and Industrial Elaboration of Thermal Energy Storage Units Made of Recycled Vitrified Industrial Wastes. Americ. Soc. Mechan. Eng. Digital Collect. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2011-62930 (2012).
Yin, M. et al. Non-Ferrous metal smelting slags for thermal energy storage: A mini review. Buildings 15, 2376 (2025).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
**M. Díaz-Piloneta: ** Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing Original Draft, Writing-Review & Editing, Visualization. **M. Terrados-Cristos, ** Methodology, Investigation, Writing Original Draft, Supervision, Visualization. **F. Ortega-Fernández, ** Conceptualization, Validation, Resources, Writing Original Draft, Supervision. **G. Martínez-Huerta: ** Investigation, Writing-Review & Editing, Project administration. **V. Álvarez-Cabal: ** Methodology, Validation, Resources **,** Writing-original draft, Project administration.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Diaz-Piloneta, M., Terrados-Cristos, M., Ortega-Fernandez, F. et al. Experimental characterization of iron mining tailings as sustainable material for thermal energy storage. Sci Rep 15, 40218 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24061-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-24061-0









