Table 3 Scalability study of the proposed HPDDMOARS scheme and the benchmarked FP-MPSOCA, CSAMMAPA, EWOAMHM and NSGAMAP approaches.
Compared Mechanisms | Makespan (seconds) with different number of IoT application tasks | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1000 | 1500 | 2000 | 2500 | 3000 | |
NSGAMAP | 175 | 206 | 276 | 312 | 298 |
EWOAMHM | 181 | 199 | 224 | 342 | 398 |
CSAMMAPA | 198 | 212 | 254 | 287 | 356 |
FP-MPSOCA | 167 | 198 | 243 | 298 | 324 |
Proposed HPDDMOARS | 153 | 189 | 213 | 254 | 289 |
 | Energy (Kw/h) with different number of IoT application tasks | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1000 | 1500 | 2000 | 2500 | 3000 | |
NSGAMAP | 623 | 786 | 865 | 942 | 998 |
EWOAMHM | 589 | 690 | 856 | 989 | 943 |
CSAMMAPA | 754 | 743 | 876 | 942 | 932 |
FP-MPSOCA | 673 | 765 | 812 | 912 | 931 |
Proposed HPDDMOARS | 564 | 675 | 798 | 894 | 911 |