Table 5 Correspondence between linguistic terms and IVPFNs numbers.

From: TOPSIS prefabricated building construction evaluation based on interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy numbers based on prospect theory

Nomenclature

IVPFNs \(P~\left( {\left[ {\mu _{{jkL}} ,\mu _{{jkU}} } \right],\left[ {\nu _{{jkL}} ,\nu _{{jkU}} } \right]} \right)\)

\(\:{\mu\:}_{jkL}\)

\(\:{\mu\:}_{jkU}\)

\(\:{\nu\:}_{jkL}\)

\(\:{\nu\:}_{jkU}\)

Absolutely bad (AB)

0

0

0.9\(\:0\)

1\(\:0.00\)

Quite bad (QB)

0.10

0.20

0.80

0.9\(\:0\)

Bad (B)

0.20

0.35

0.65

0.80

Slightly bad (SB)

0.35

0.45

0.55

0.65

Fair (F)

0.45

0.55

0.45

0.55

Exactly equal (EE)

0.5\(\:0\)

0.5\(\:0\)

0.5\(\:0\)

0.5\(\:0\)

Slightly good (SG)

0.55

0.65

0.35

0.45

Good(G)

0.65

0.8\(\:0\)

0.20

0.35

Quit good (QG)

0.8\(\:0\)

0.90

0.10

0.20

Absolutely high (AH)

0.90

1\(\:0.00\)

0

0