Table 3 The data for the Case study Problem-2.

From: Cost-efficient design and optimization of robotic assembly lines using a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm framework

Tasks	r₁		r₂		r₃		r₄		r₅
Tasks	Task Time	Setup cost	Task Time	Setup cost	Task Time	Setup cost	Task Time	Setup cost	Task Time	Setup cost
1	142	50,096	67	46,663	88	77,887	56	50,625	84	73,196
2	92	63,538	45	34,997	183	84,839	56	51,578	69	21,385
3	56	15,117	25	98,018	36	77,789	37	50,259	37	84,741
4	64	66,743	61	66,752	53	18,170	45	29,641	47	99,754
5	62	68,232	29	7977	92	75,838	35	70,466	95	60,901
6	68	53,421	51	47,191	132	24,098	83	35,603	177	37,248
7	93	74,036	90	91,059	137	70,892	71	54,142	158	72,484
8	59	43,240	73	76,358	90	63,365	51	84,250	116	11,088
9	29	57,895	36	50,041	36	64,285	51	78,715	50	36,888
10	53	81,028	55	15,533	37	51,844	36	74,453	43	60,191
11	63	90,874	40	64,900	85	47,503	59	80,482	51	53,800
12	42	72,710	73	20,473	49	24,624	109	41,001	49	78,741
13	42	33,636	36	63,173	91	63,082	64	81,825	47	50,853
14	77	13,792	46	5172	93	50,264	68	46,759	66	73,029
15	37	16,556	45	73,558	50	24,640	37	60,285	83	59,199
16	28	22,770	28	46,415	73	96,557	47	25,008	37	38,208
17	65	78,691	49	27,065	41	71,272	53	75,673	51	40,589
18	93	74,746	49	96,233	63	37,789	151	85,362	101	96,533
19	103	84,421	37	46,587	62	63,767	54	72,794	89	39,538
20	38	57,643	55	56,609	38	18,904	29	11,990	34	74,541
21	51	5297	83	37,206	122	11,443	67	82,058	117	59,037
22	36	46,672	43	84,290	57	36,759	47	57,463	60	6846
23	70	85,794	87	62,376	74	35,735	63	38,263	146	69,981
24	42	89,801	83	51,176	108	26,112	49	33,609	49	74,044
25	103	99,394	55	21,294	66	69,078	54	29,432	83	20,319
26	36	81,529	78	42,331	64	35,027	34	19,289	48	28,761
27	44	61,736	82	97,465	49	51,086	68	15,327	46	17,914
28	105	83,459	36	49,597	69	16,304	119	45,785	94	95,411
29	58	89,656	31	64,897	59	55,606	37	21,657	60	47,612
30	43	12,232	37	8800	59	11,876	53	51,001	64	14,908
31	42	10,915	32	58,535	51	24,179	82	63,145	113	59,162
32	40	25,427	39	99,761	89	30,146	45	74,224	91	34,644
33	32	24,150	31	65,102	99	14,612	57	19,030	46	41,931
34	93	61,280	37	99,736	50	19,694	53	85,786	91	19,344
35	37	19,657	50	25,905	72	90,428	84	72,444	53	47,293

Back to article page

Table 3 The data for the Case study Problem-2.

Search

Quick links