Table 2 Comparison of MB removal % of different studies.
Adsorbents | Conditions | Removal % | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dye concentration (mg/L) | Adsorbent weight (g) | Treatment time (min.) | |||
PVA@WNS composite | 5 | 0.25 | 120 | 82 | |
PVA/CMC/TUR film | 10 | 0.04 | 170 | 83 | |
PVA/bagasse | 181 | 1.0 | 70 | 92.8 | |
Cellulose/PVA/ Graphite3D Porous Foam | 150 | 0.06 | 300 | 96.2 | |
PVA swollen gel | 5 | 1 | 120 | 70 | |
PVA/Graphene Oxide nanocomposite | 80 | 1.5 | 2900 | 90 | |
Mesoporous TiO2/ PVA nanocomposite | 55 | 0.075 | 8.0 | 97 | |
PVA/TiO2/microfibrillated cellulose | 5 | Thin Film | 15 | 90 | |
PVA/alginate/bentonite Hydrogel | 50 | 1.5 | 300 | 95 | |
PVA/TiO2nanowires/Biochar nanorods | 20 | 0.5 | 20 | 100 | This study |
