Table 3 Comparison results of different models in the experiment.
Model route | Model type | Param. | GFLOPs | ACC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CNN | VGG-16 | 6.3 | 1.3 | 84.37% |
ResNet50 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 86.34% | |
GoogleNet | 6.5 | 2.1 | 86.89% | |
DenseNet | 7.1 | 1.8 | 87.62% | |
MoblileNet | 8.2 | 2.3 | 88.72% | |
Transformer | ViT | 6.0 | 3.3 | 92.26% |
Swin | 7.3 | 2.7 | 94.75% | |
LocalViT | 6.2 | 2.5 | 93.58% | |
DeepViT | 6.8 | 2.9 | 94.66% | |
CaiT | 5.1 | 2.1 | 95.28% | |
CrossViT | 5.7 | 2.4 | 95.81% | |
MPViT | 5.4 | 1.6 | 96.79% | |
EMPViT-Base | 4.3 | 2.9 | 98.84% |