Table 4 Characterization of the evaluation criteria that are used to evaluate the SPI (fuzzy sets and thresholds).

From: A two-stage model of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and the fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique to prioritize sustainable sanitation services under uncertainty

Code

Performance measures (evaluation criteira)

Performance levels

Low

Medium

High

EC1

Demography

< 10,000

10,000–15,000

> 15,000

EC2

Water consumption/ wastewater production

< 45 lcpd

45–65 lcpd

> 65 lcpd

EC3

Wastewater reuse

Minimal reuse potential

(Low value agricultural land)

Medium reuse potential

(Medium value agricultural land)

Great reuse potential

(High value agricultural land)

EC4

Environmental factors

Community located in a region of low hydrological vulnerability to groundwater pollution (no springs, groundwater wells, etc.)

Community located in a region of medium hydrological vulnerability to groundwater pollution

Community located in a region of high hydrological vulnerability to groundwater pollution

EC5

Operational body

Village council, Committee (Ministry of Local Government and Municipal Development and Lending Fund classification)

Municipality C, D (Ministry of Local Government and Municipal Development and Lending Fund classification)

Municipality A, B (Ministry of Local Government and Municipal Development and Lending Fund classification)

EC6

Risks of industrial wastes

> 15 (stonecutters + olives-oil mill + textiles)

15 − 5

< 5

EC7

The socio-economic factor

<= 30% of the total population aged 10 years and over is economically active

30–35% of the total population aged 10 years and over is economically active

> 35% of the total population aged 10 years and over is economically active

EC8

The geographical factor

< 50% by gravity flow

50 − 95% by gravity flow

> 95% by gravity flow

EC9

License issues

C

B

A