Table 5 Comparative analysis of ECMVFD-FTLTDO method on VTD dataset42.
VTD Dataset | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Methods | \(Acc{u}_{y}\) | \(Pre{c}_{n}\) | \(Rec{a}_{l}\) | \({F1}_{score}\) | \(MCC\) |
PatchMatch-DFAVCMDL | 69.11 | 70.95 | 70.34 | 69.95 | 73.28 |
LSTM-EnDec | 65.60 | 74.13 | 72.71 | 70.69 | 74.63 |
CRF-Layer Model | 64.30 | 73.73 | 73.06 | 70.13 | 71.97 |
High-pass FCN | 69.00 | 85.45 | 79.01 | 81.86 | 72.09 |
Dense Moment Extraction | 78.34 | 78.18 | 86.85 | 83.27 | 82.26 |
VCMFD Method | 82.99 | 75.11 | 70.90 | 70.81 | 81.18 |
CNN-CMVFD | 81.87 | 82.75 | 91.84 | 91.60 | 77.35 |
ECMVFD-FTLTDO | 92.67 | 93.50 | 92.67 | 92.83 | 86.16 |