Table 2 Performance comparison of different algorithms across various dimensions.
Dimension | Algorithm | PSO | JADE | SHADE | COBiDE | O-L-SHADE | DEWDVR | LCTADE | CC-LCTADE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D=10 | No. of OF | 7 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 8 | 15 | 16 |
rank | 13.67 | 6.81 | 6.75 | 6.88 | 6.47 | 7.46 | 5.48 | 5.23 | |
\(\delta =0.05\) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
\(\delta =0.1\) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
D=30 | No. of OF | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 17 | 23 |
rank | 14.52 | 6.57 | 5.81 | 6.08 | 5.47 | 8.09 | 3.67 | 3.23 | |
\(\delta =0.05\) | = | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
\(\delta =0.1\) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
D=50 | No. of OF | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 13 | 15 |
rank | 16.88 | 3.41 | 4.21 | 3.58 | 4.17 | 5.76 | 2.38 | 2.31 | |
\(\delta =0.05\) | = | + | + | + | + | = | + | + | |
\(\delta =0.1\) | = | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
D=100 | No. of OF | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 12 | 13 |
rank | 17.2 | 3.83 | 4.03 | 4.56 | 4.12 | 6.34 | 2.23 | 2.19 | |
\(\delta = 0.05\) | - | + | + | = | = | = | + | + | |
\(\delta = 0.1\) | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
