Table 1 Comparison between various methodologies.
Authors | Clustering methods | Hierarchy types | CH selection mechanisms | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nguyen et al.6 | K-means and LEACH | Tree based | K-means selects cluster heads (CHs) at the center of each cluster | Minimized intra-cluster power consumption | Uneven cluster sizes may impact power consumption at sometimes |
Devika et al.7 | Combined Particle Swarm Optimization and Wolf Search | Flat routing and hierarchical routing. | LEACH-PWO used to identify energy-efficient and reliable CHs | Increased throughput and network lifetime. | Self-configuration and restoring strategies not adopted |
Subramanyam et al.8 | Hybrid HGWCSOA-OCHS scheme for cluster head selection | LEACH and LEACH-C, hybrid HGWCSOA-OCHS scheme for cluster head selection | Hybrid HGWCSOA-OCHS scheme for cluster head selection | Prevents premature convergence and enabling effective exploration of the search space. | Self-configuration is not possible |
Nigam et al.9 | Shortest path tree | Tree structure | Traditional method | Reduced number of data transmissions and scalability | No detailed CH selection process |
Yuan et al.10 | Plane routing | Two-tier hierarchy | Dynamic selection | Balanced data load across the network | No appropriate clustering methods discussed |
Manchanta et al.11 | Energy-efficient compression sensing-based clustering framework (ECSCF) | Node to CH hierarchy | Based on probability and threshold value for each node | Better load balancing and prolonged network lifetime. | Node mobility and scalability |
Prabha et al.12 | Heterogeneous clustering approach (HCA) | Hierarchical structure from node to CH | Based on a probability of 0.1, and the number of CHs is limited to 10 in each round. | Improved energy efficiency, Enhanced network lifetime and data prediction accuracy | Self-election of CH |
Aziz et al.13 | Efficient Multi-hop Cluster-based Aggregation scheme using Hybrid Compressive Sensing (EMCA-CS) | Multi-hop hierarchy | Lexicographical model | Hexagonal clustering pattern covers the entire sensing area, reduced overall energy consumption, improved network lifetime and stability. | Due to multi-hop transmission shortest path cannot be achieved |
Pacharaney et al.14 | Spatially correlated clustering approach | Hexagonal topology | Stochastically elect the CH | Reduced number of transmissions, reduced intra-cluster communication, high success rate | Scalability |
Zhang et al.15 | CBA with K-means clustering algorithm | Tree based | Highet energy node | Effective parallel computing with enhanced efficiency | Directed and weighted networks not discussed |
Ghaderi et al.16 | Equal-size Clusters, Non-equal Clusters, Hierarchical Clustering | Grid-based Routing, Cluster-based Routing | Hierarchical model by nodes themselves | Error rate reduction and traffic load balancing | Energy consumption not discussed effectively |
Kaur et al.17 | Fuzzy C-means (FCM) algorithm, GSTEB | Tree-based routing | REAC-IN and swarm intelligence algorithms | Energy efficiency, Improved network lifetime, | Shortest path selection issue |
Ahmed et al.18 | Block Sparse Bayesian learning and 1-norm recovery | Effective speech signal recovery, Enhanced performance, Effective reconstruction accuracy | Not able to recover speech signals continuously, noise infiltration issue due to sampling process | ||
Xue et al.19 | Secure block parallel compressive sensing wit bit level XOR | Better reconstruction, Enhanced security, reduced computational complexity | Poor comparison with existing methods, optimal block size selection not discussed | ||
Canh et al.20 | CS with Restricted Structural Random Matrix | Preserves democracy of CS, successful reconstruction even at low sampling rates, reduced bit rate overhead | Additional storage required, Higher computational complexity | ||
Sekar et al.21 | Compressed Tensor Completion with Randomized Singular Value Decomposition | Minimized energy usage and extended lifetime | Implementation flaws, computational challenge, high overheads affect lifetime | ||
Li et al.22 | A tail-Hadamard product parametrization | Greater signal recovery, best quality image reconstruction | Performance at non-linear equations not discussed |