Table 4 Performance of each model on the testing cohort.

From: Comparative performance of multiple ensemble learning models for preoperative prediction of tumor deposits in rectal cancer based on MR imaging

 

AUC (95% CI)

ACC (%)

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

NPV (%)

PPV (%)

Bagging-ensemble learning model

 RF

0.747 (0.606–0.864)

76.7

31.6

97.6

75.5

85.7

Boosting-ensemble learning model

 LightGBM

0.781 (0.654–0.889)

66.7

36.8

80.5

73.3

46.7

 XGBoost

0.787 (0.661–0.888)

70

31.6

87.8

73.5

54.5

 AdaBoost

0.786 (0.643–0.899)

68.3

63.2

70.7

80.6

50

 CatBoost

0.804 (0.676–0.902)

75

21.1

100

73.2

100

Voting-ensemble learning model

 Soft voting

0.875 (0.765–0.953)

80

47.4

95.1

79.6

81.8

  1. Significant values are in [bold].