Table 9 Normalized decision matrix.

From: Multi-criteria decision-based optimization and multivariable regression analysis of date palm fiber reinforced concrete modified with silica fume under normal and elevated temperatures

Mix no

Fresh density

Unit weight

Mass loss (800)

CS (28 days)

FS (28 Days)

CS (200)

CS (800)

Mass loss (200)

Slump

T.C

Water absorption

Split tensile strength

M1

0.90

0.91

1.0

0.77

0.81

0.75

0.89

0.50

1.00

0.70

0.75

0.82

M2

0.92

0.92

0.87

0.63

0.87

0.67

0.82

0.42

0.94

0.72

0.65

0.86

M3

0.93

0.93

0.72

0.64

0.91

0.57

0.60

0.33

0.90

0.77

0.60

0.89

M4

0.93

0.94

0.86

0.85

0.84

0.84

1.00

0.62

0.95

0.79

0.84

0.90

M5

0.95

0.96

0.81

0.94

0.96

0.97

0.73

0.58

0.88

0.88

0.81

0.93

M6

0.96

0.96

0.69

0.66

0.93

0.75

0.56

0.47

0.87

0.85

0.70

0.94

M7

0.97

0.96

0.84

1.00

0.86

1.00

0.78

1.00

0.73

0.86

1.00

0.96

M8

0.98

0.97

0.80

0.92

0.97

0.94

0.71

0.74

0.73

0.90

0.94

0.91

M9

0.98

0.98

0.67

0.68

1.00

0.79

0.58

0.55

0.68

0.93

0.84

1.00

M10

0.99

0.98

0.78

0.61

0.69

0.80

0.46

0.66

0.62

0.92

0.70

0.64

M11

1.00

0.99

0.70

0.53

0.65

0.60

0.40

0.46

0.56

0.96

0.61

0.72

M12

0.99

1.00

0.66

0.49

0.73

0.58

0.49

0.42

0.55

1.00

0.56

0.69