Table 11 Comparative analysis of various algorithms for the tubular column design optimization problem.
From: Recent metaheuristic algorithms for solving some civil engineering optimization problems
Algorithm | Time | Average | STD | Best | Worst | Solution | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\({x}_{1}\) | \({x}_{2}\) | ||||||
BES–GO | 3.83E−01 | 2.65E+01 | 3.61E−15 | 2.65E+01 | 2.65E+01 | 5.45E+00 | 2.92E−01 |
GO | 1.95E−01 | 2.65E+01 | 3.61E−15 | 2.65E+01 | 2.65E+01 | 5.45E+00 | 2.92E−01 |
BES | 4.92E−01 | 2.65E+01 | 3.61E−15 | 2.65E+01 | 2.65E+01 | 5.45E+00 | 2.92E−01 |
PSO | 2.34E−01 | 2.65E+01 | 9.65E−15 | 2.65E+01 | 2.65E+01 | 5.45E+00 | 2.92E−01 |
GTO | 1.53E−01 | 2.65E+01 | 9.28E−15 | 2.65E+01 | 2.65E+01 | 5.45E+00 | 2.92E−01 |
TSO | 5.14E−02 | 2.65E+01 | 2.89E−10 | 2.65E+01 | 2.65E+01 | 5.45E+00 | 2.92E−01 |
ALO | 6.92E−01 | 2.65E+01 | 8.93E−07 | 2.65E+01 | 2.65E+01 | 5.45E+00 | 2.92E−01 |
GWO | 4.32E−02 | 2.65E+01 | 2.03E−03 | 2.65E+01 | 2.65E+01 | 5.45E+00 | 2.92E−01 |
HHO | 1.10E−01 | 2.66E+01 | 7.83E−02 | 2.65E+01 | 2.68E+01 | 5.45E+00 | 2.92E−01 |
DOA | 8.76E−02 | 2.66E+01 | 3.43E−01 | 2.65E+01 | 2.83E+01 | 5.45E+00 | 2.92E−01 |
TSA | 5.16E−02 | 2.66E+01 | 6.31E−02 | 2.65E+01 | 2.68E+01 | 5.46E+00 | 2.92E−01 |
