Table 8 Comparative analysis of various algorithms for the welded beam design problem.

From: Recent metaheuristic algorithms for solving some civil engineering optimization problems

Algorithm

Time

Average

STD

Best

Worst

Solution

h

l

t

b

BES–GO

5.03E−01

1.72E+00

7.92E−16

1.72E+00

1.72E+00

2.06E−01

3.47E+00

9.04E+00

2.06E−01

BES

6.34E−01

1.72E+00

1.19E−15

1.72E+00

1.72E+00

2.06E−01

3.47E+00

9.04E+00

2.06E−01

GO

3.14E−01

1.72E+00

1.74E−13

1.72E+00

1.72E+00

2.06E−01

3.47E+00

9.04E+00

2.06E−01

GWO

8.90E−02

1.73E+00

2.94E−03

1.73E+00

1.74E+00

2.06E−01

3.48E+00

9.04E+00

2.06E−01

PSO

2.86E−01

1.79E+00

1.02E−01

1.72E+00

2.08E+00

2.06E−01

3.47E+00

9.04E+00

2.06E−01

ALO

1.34E+00

1.84E+00

1.34E−01

1.72E+00

2.27E+00

2.06E−01

3.47E+00

9.04E+00

2.06E−01

GTO

2.42E−01

1.84E+00

2.64E−01

1.72E+00

2.78E+00

2.06E−01

3.47E+00

9.04E+00

2.06E−01

TSA

9.74E−02

1.85E+00

4.34E−02

1.79E+00

1.96E+00

1.82E−01

4.06E+00

9.25E+00

2.05E−01

DOA

1.31E−01

1.86E+00

2.32E−01

1.72E+00

2.59E+00

2.06E−01

3.47E+00

9.04E+00

2.06E−01

TSO

9.45E−02

1.98E+00

3.10E−01

1.73E+00

2.73E+00

2.06E−01

3.47E+00

9.04E+00

2.06E−01

HHO

2.08E−01

2.21E+00

3.66E−01

1.79E+00

2.98E+00

2.07E−01

3.93E+00

9.01E+00

2.07E−01