Table 4 Comparison of tomato identification experimental results.
Algorithm | Testing data | Correct identification | Accuracy of recognition (%) | FLOPs/GB |
---|---|---|---|---|
FasterR-CNN | 102 | 95 | 93.9 | 398.80 |
SSD | 102 | 91 | 89.6 | 62.73 |
YOLOv4 | 102 | 94 | 93.1 | 60.62 |
YOLOv5 | 102 | 95 | 94.1 | 57.68 |