Table 1 Product information of the CAD/CAM materials assessed in the current study.

From: Dimensional accuracy of additive and subtractive manufactured ceramic-reinforced hybrid composite inlays: a CBCT-based in vitro study

Group/Item

Manufacturing method

Materials

Manufacturer

Composition

Shade

PVC

3D-printing

VarseoSmile crown plus

Bego, Bremen, Germany

40 -isopropylidiphenol, ethoxylated and 2-methylprop-2enoic acid. Silanized dental glass, methyl benzoylfor- mate, diphenyl (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide, 30–50 wt%—inorganic fillers (particle size 0.7 μm)

A2 Dentin

PVT

3D-printing

VarseoSmile TriniQ

Bego, Bremen, Germany

4,4’-isopropylidenediphenol, ethoxylated and 2-methylprop-2-enoic acid, Benzene acetic acid, alpha–oxo- methyl ester, diphenyl (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide

A2 Dentin

MVE

Milling

Vita Enamic

Vita Zahnfabrik,

Bad Säckingen, Germany

Feldspar ceramic 86 wt%, Methacrylate polymer 14 wt%

A2 HT – 2M2

CGP

Conventional

Gradia plus

GC Europe NV, Leuven, Belgium

UDMA, EDMA (75 wt% filler, ceramic, prepolymer, SiO2)

HB – DA2