Table 2 Multivariate analysis of the association of CVD with 25(OH)D status.

From: Association between serum vitamin D level and cardiovascular disease in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study

CVD

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

OR (95% CI)

P

OR (95% CI)

P

OR (95% CI)

P

OR (95% CI)

P

25(OH)D

1.00 (0.99, 1.01)

0.9622

0.99 (0.98, 1.01)

0.2761

0.99 (0.98, 1.01)

0.2995

0.97 (0.94, 0.99)

0.0131

25(OH)D categorical

 ≥20

1.0

 

1.0

 

1.0

 

1.0

 

 12–20

0.98 (0.73, 1.32)

0.9001

1.23 (0.89, 1.70)

0.2166

1.20 (0.86, 1.67)

0.2829

1.08 (0.70, 1.65)

0.7298

 < 12

1.37 (0.96, 1.96)

0.0840

1.88 (1.25, 2.81)

0.0023

1.87 (1.24, 2.81)

0.0028

2.25 (1.33, 3.79)

0.0023

P for trend

0.98 (0.96, 1.01)

0.1536

0.96 (0.93, 0.99)

0.0042

0.96 (0.94, 0.99)

0.0054

0.95 (0.92, 0.99)

0.0076

  1. Model 1 was unadjusted; Model 2 was unadjusted for sex, age, BMI, SBP, DBP, Smoking status, Alcohol intake; Model 3 was unadjusted for Model 2 plus new onset, duration of T2DM, hypoglycemic therapy and Osteoporosis; Model 4 was unadjusted for Model 3 plus TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, FBG, HbA1c, C-peptide 0, C-peptide 120, BUN, Cr, ALT, ALB, TBIL, PTH.
  2. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit tests was not significant for any of the logistic regression models (all p > 0.05). OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval.
Back to article page