Table 1 Comparison of the proposed approach and other TP researches.
References | CWM | NLTP | Dimension | Objective | TE | TT | CE | Circular Economy | Environment | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bera et al.1 | ✗ | ✗ | Four | Single | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | Crisp, Rough, Fuzzy | Generalized reduced gradient method |
Ahmad and Adhami32 | ✗ | ✓ | Two | Multiple | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | Fuzzy | Neutrosophic compromise programming approach |
Samanta et al.23 | ✗ | ✗ | Four | Multiple | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | Intuitionistic fuzzy | Convex combination method |
Giri et al.25 | ✗ | ✗ | Four | Multiple | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | Neutrosophic fuzzy | Neutrosophic and Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy programming |
Haque et al.53 | ✗ | ✓ | Three | Multiple | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | Interval-valued | Weighted Sum Technique |
Chhibber et al.35 | ✗ | ✓ | Two | Multiple | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | Intuitionistic fuzzy | Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS |
Bind et al.27 | ✗ | ✗ | Four | Multiple | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | Intuitionistic fuzzy | Proposed methodology |
Akhtar et al.26 | ✗ | ✗ | Four | Single | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | Type-2 fuzzy | Generalized reduced gradient method |
Sharma et al.28 | ✗ | ✗ | Four | Multiple | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | Time-sequential complex Fermatean hesitant fuzzy | Fuzzy Programming, WST and GCM |
Proposed work | ✓ | ✓ | Four | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Time-sequential Fermatean bipolar hesitant fuzzy | WST, GCM |
