Table 2 Significance of effects and hazard ratios for effects used in Cox proportional hazards model (complete model enabling inclusion of multiple predictor variables and interaction terms) for sessions to pass the initial discrimination and reversal learning stage, for calves provided different reward types (Aim 1) and subject to different social housing treatments and reward types (Aim 2).

From: Effects of reward type and previous social experience on cognitive testing outcomes of weaned dairy calves

 

Stage

Effect

Reference levels

HR (95% CI)a

χ2

P-value

Aim 1

Initial

BW

+ 1 kg

–

–

1.3 (1.1,1.5)

13.6

< 0.001

  

Reward

–

–

–

–

7.5

0.02

   

Exit

Food

–

2.9 (0.7,11.9)

2.3

0.13

   

Exit

Social

–

0.5 (0.2,1.3)

2.1

0.15

   

Food

Social

–

0.2 (0.04,0.6)

7.3

0.007

 

Reversal

BW

+ 1 kg

–

–

0.8 (0.7,1.0)

4.6

0.03

  

Reward

–

–

–

–

4.2

0.12

   

Exit

Food

–

2.3 (0.4,14.2)

0.8

0.37

   

Exit

Social

–

4.1 (1.1,16.4)

4.1

0.04

   

Food

Social

–

1.8 (0.4,8.3)

0.6

0.45

Aim 2

Initial

BW

+ 1 kg

–

–

1.2 (1.1,1.3)

7.9

0.005

  

Housing

–

–

–

–

2.7

0.10

  

Reward

–

–

–

–

2.3

0.13

  

Interaction†

–

–

–

–

4.7

0.03

   

Individual

Pair

Exit

0.4 (0.1,1.2)

2.7

0.10

   

Individual

Pair

Social

2.3 (0.7,7.5)

2.0

0.16

   

Exit

Social

Individual

0.4 (0.1,1.3)

2.3

0.13

   

Exit

Social

Pair

2.4 (0.8,7.2)

2.5

0.11

 

Reversal

BW

+ 1 kg

–

–

0.8 (0.7,1.0)

4.9

0.03

  

Housing

–

–

–

–

0.6

0.46

  

Reward

–

–

–

–

6.0

0.01

  

Interactionb

–

–

–

–

2.2

0.14

   

Individual

Pair

Exit

1.6 (0.5,5.9)

0.6

0.46

   

Individual

Pair

Social

0.4 (0.1,1.4)

2.1

0.15

   

Exit

Social

Individual

6.0 (1.4,24.9)

6.0

0.01

   

Exit

Social

Pair

1.4 (0.3,6.5)

0.2

0.66

  1. aHR (95% CI) = hazard ratios within variable with 95% confidence intervals (lower, upper).
  2. bInteraction between reward type and previous housing treatment.