Table 2 Connection between TyG index and SMI risk.
Item | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR (95%CI) | P | HR (95%CI) | P | HR (95%CI) | P | HR (95%CI) | P | |
Q1 (n = 3609) | 1 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 |
Q2 (n = 3614) | 1.21 (1.13–1.30) | < 0.001 | 1.05 (0.98–1.13) | 0.160 | 1.00 (0.93–1.07) | 0.988 | 0.98 (0.91–1.05) | 0.520 |
Q3 (n = 3604) | 1.42 (1.33–1.52) | < 0.001 | 1.16 (1.08–1.24) | <0.001 | 1.06 (0.99–1.13) | 0.115 | 1.02 (0.95–1.09) | 0.651 |
Q4 (n = 3393) | 1.94 (1.82–2.08) | <0.001 | 1.47 (1.37–1.57) | <0.001 | 1.12 (1.04–1.20) | 0.003 | 1.09 (1.00-1.18) | 0.056 |
TyG | 1.61 (1.55–1.68) | < 0.001 | 1.38 (1.33–1.44) | < 0.001 | 1.11 (1.06–1.16) | < 0.001 | 1.09 (1.03–1.15) | 0.002 |