Introduction

Engineered cementitious composites (ECC) is one of the specific forms of high-performance fiber-reinforced cementitious composites (HPFRCC. They have a special mix of high ductility and an medium fiber volume percentage1,2. ECCs are designed to possess TiO2 toughness and hardening qualities, even in ordinary or harsh conditions. ECCs are composite constituents that are designed to help the concrete sector to optimise the usage of materials, reduce waste, offer cost effective and environmentally friendly advantages, and enhance the longevity of structures3,4. Furthermore, an Engineered Cementitious Composite is composite material for improving the durability of construction developments owing to its exceptional resistance to cracking resistance, impressive ductility, and ability to manage the width of crack5.This is due to the fact that ECCs have the ability to create stable and abundant microcracks, which greatly improve their durability in terms of ductility and tensile strength6. An ECC has a higher efficiency of approximately 3–5% compared to control mixture (CM) as a result of its high tensile strength7,8,9,10. The study findings indicate that the crushing strength of the material extends from 20 to 95 MPa, the tensile strength fluctuates between 4 and 12 MPa, while the compressive strain rises from 0.40 to 0.65%11,12,13,14.

Although ECC has certain advantages compared to conventional concrete, it also has several associated downsides. Initially, the drying shrinkage of the ECC mixture exceeded that of conventional concrete, leading to reduced eigenstrain in the concrete matrix under restraint. Because there are no large particles, ECC has a lower Young’s modulus than ordinary concrete. This leads to a larger strain when the material attains its maximum compressive strength (CS)15. Moreover, the presence of various naturally occurring and man-made substances often exposes concrete projects to corrosive environmental conditions. Sulphate is a significant contributor to the deterioration of mortar and concrete construction16. When sulphate particles mix with the calcium hydroxide and calcium aluminate hydrate that are already in Portland cement (PC), certain things happen17,18. Ettringite and gypsum are responsible for the expansion and fracturing of concrete, leading to a brittle and less durable surface19,20.

Sulphate breaks down the important parts of wet Portland cement, specifically calcium silicate and calcium hydroxide, which weakens the bond between concrete particles. This results in a reduction in the strength and durability of the concrete21. Acid exposure in concrete is widely regarded as a secondary threat. Acid can corrode concrete in many ways. Acids present in soil or underwater, whether they occur by nature or are a result of waste from industrial process disposal, could harm the concrete structures located beneath the surface. Industrial applications may potentially experience acid leakage and inadvertent spills22. The technique for carrying out an acid attack varies due to the type of acid used. Nitric acid, sulfuric, hydrochloric, and carbonic are the main encountered acids related to concrete. The ultimate result is the disintegration of calcium hydroxide and cement hydrates into calcium salts, leading to the deterioration of exposed concrete. Furthermore, the acid attack differs the sulphate attack in that it does not result in considerable expansion during breakdown. In contrast to the hydration products of cement, the carbonaceous substantial is prone to acid assault23. Unlike other acids, sulfuric acid (H2SO4) can dissolve and expand concrete. According to multiple scientists, concrete treated with sulfuric acid decreases weight. When sulfuric acid chemically combines with calcium silicate hydrate gel (CSHG) and calcium hydroxide, it produces gypsum. The process by which concrete dissolves and expands is referred to as gypsum corrosion. Gypsum corrosion causes a decrease in concrete’s alkalinity, which in turn leads to microbiological corrosion. Corrosion produces an inferior compound lacking cementitious properties, leading to rapid deterioration, weakening, and, in severe cases, complete disintegration and collapse of the concrete structure. Gypsum can undergo a subsequent series of reactions described in the section on sulphate attack during the second stage of sulfuric acid-induced concrete corrosion, leading to the formation of ettringite or/ and Thomasite. Though, ettringite and Thomasite are not dependable in an acidic atmosphere24,25, hence the main outcome would be gypsum when the sulfuric acid attack.

Researchers investigated two methods to improve concrete’s acid resistance: reducing its permeability and including alternative mineral fillers to decrease calcium hydroxide production when there is a hydration of Portland cement26. Scientists have developed unique mortars and concrete by replacing certain weight proportions of cement with additives, showing encouraging outcomes in resisting sulphate attacks27,28. Concrete uses mineral admixtures, which include nanoparticles, to mitigate the harmful effects of sulphate and acid assaults29,30. The efficiency of a pozzolanic reaction is evident due to its inverse correlation with the surface area of amorphous nanoscale particles. Generally, the incorporation of pozzolan enhances the density and resistance of concrete to chemical attacks. However, it also reduces or eliminates the free and leachable calcium hydroxide31. Emerging nanotechnology advancements hold great potential for advancing nanoscale materials. Nanotechnology has facilitated the manipulation of matter at the atomic scale, thereby empowering researchers to exert control over the qualities of the resulting product. Studies have demonstrated that nano-engineered materials surpass their larger-scale equivalents in performance because of their small size32,33,34,35. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) has emerged as a revolutionary nanomaterial in the construction sectors, offering a solution to the need for high-performance materials at a reasonable cost. Cementitious composites widely use Titanium dioxide (Titania) nanoparticles owing to their stable physical and chemical attack, strong photochemical activity, and cost-effectiveness36,37,38,39. These nanoparticles are particularly valuable because they accelerate the hydration development by occupying microscale gaps and offering sites for the development of hydration products40,41,42. Meng et al.43 found that incorporating titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles at a concentration of 0.05% into cement significantly enhanced its compressive strength by 45% during the early stages of curing. This happened because the growth of C–S–H sped up and the number of pores went down after nanoparticles were added as nanofillers. Jayapalan et al.44 discovered that TiO2 nanoparticles induced the formation of nucleation sites within PC hydration products. These particles accelerated the reaction by reducing the energy barrier, which is the lowest quantity of energy needed for the reaction to occur. Zhang et al.45 verified that including TiO2 nanomaterial in cement mortar has a substantial impact on its compressive strength. The process expedites cement hydration and enhances the pore-refining action to achieve this. Feng et al.46 found that substitution of titanium nanoparticles resulted in an enhancement of the 28-day flexural strength of cement paste. The addition of nanomodification enhanced the paste microstructure by augmenting the cementitious phase, reducing porosity and internal micro-cracks and defects, attaining a denser microstructure with reduced roughness, and creating needle-shaped nanoparticles. The results show that using TiO2 as a nanomaterial can effectively lessen the problems that come with putting an ECC into wide use. It can also effectively counteract the negative effects of acid attack and sulphate attack that were seen in this study. The principal goal of this investigation was to find out how strong an ECC was when it had different amounts of PVA fibers and TiO2 as a nanomaterial, how well it resisted acid and sulphate attacks, and how quickly chloride could pass through it. They accomplished this by employing RSM modelling and optimisation techniques.

Experimental program

Materials

Portland cement (PC), which complied with the ASTM C15047 standard, served as the binding agent for ECC production. The investigation classified the collected fly ash (FA) as class F fly debris, which conforms to ASTM C618 specifications48. Table 1 presents the chemical composition for FA and PC. Furthermore, the experiment incorporated TiO2 powder as a nanomaterial into malleable concrete. The particle dimensions vary from 10 to 50 nm. The experiment employed a third-generation superplasticizer to uniformly distribute the nanoparticles, preventing any adhesion or aggregation upon combination with water49. However, river sand was used as fine aggregates, and it was sieved (lesser than about 4.75 mm) prior used in mixture. The polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fiber was used by ECC’s volume fraction to determine the mixture’s fiber content. To alter the properties of the interface between the fiber and composites, a 1.2% bulk coating of oil was useful to the fiber surface. Additionally, a superplasticizer (SP) was added into the ECC. The SP possessed a specific gravity about of 1.08 and a pH of approximately 6.2. One percent by weight of the PC was introduced to the mixture of ECC. Furthermore, the TiO2 investigation used potable water for the blending and curing functions.

Table 1 XRF of PC and FA.

Mix proportions of TiO2-ECC

It was adopted to conduct various trial mixes to obtain the targeted compressive strength more than 45 MPa and then blended with several concentrations of TiO2 and fiber. Moreover, the RSM modelling used to generate the runs by choosing TiO2 and PVA fiber as input parameters to fulfil the ECC requirements of this investigation. The two input factors under investigation were TiO2 and PVA at three different concentrations: 1%, 1.5%, and 2% by volume fraction of PVA fiber and 1%, 1.5, and 2% by weight of PC, respectively. In contrast, the water-to-binder ratio for all ECC was 0.30, with variations in percentages observed for ECC-M45, which was the most expansively used ECC in many studies. In this experimental study50,51, and a SP comprising 1.0% by mass of PC were utilised. Furthermore, the thirteen experimental trials were generated through the implementation of the central composite design (CCD) approach in RSM. The mixtures consisted of diverse concentrations and combinations of the input variables, in addition to five arbitrary iterations of each parameter, as shown in Table 2. The identical combinations were utilised to ascertain the experiment’s validity and mitigate the risk of potential variations. Additionally, the RSM assesses the effect of the interrelation among input elements on the resulting responses. As responses, compressive strength, tensile strength, apparent porosity, acid attack, sulphate attack, and rapid chloride penetration test (RCPT) were analysed.

Table 2 Mix Proportion of TiO2-ECC.

Sample preparation and testing methods

This experimental study uses the mixing configuration of TiO2-ECC composites. The process of simultaneously incorporating the FA, PC, and sand into the dry concrete mixer lasted nearly two minutes. After that, a high-speed agitator vigorously combined TiO2 and superplasticizer with water for a duration of three to five minutes. As previously stated, the experiment utilised the super-plasticizer in order to prevent potential agglomeration, enhance workability, and facilitate uniform dispersion by capitalising on the cohesive characteristics of the nanoparticles52,53. Once the ECC mixture and nanoparticles were prepared, the nanoparticle mixture was systematically poured into the rotary mixer. In this manner, the complete nanoparticle mixtures were consumed until they were thoroughly incorporated into the concrete mixture. Following this, the PVA fiber was incorporated into the revolving mixer with caution for an additional duration of 2–3 min, or until it was ensured that the fibers were evenly distributed across the mixture. In order to restore the flowability of mixtures containing a high concentration of TiO2 and render them functional, SP was introduced. A diverse range of specimens were fabricated from the fresh concrete mixture in order to conduct tests on its sulphate attack, acid attack, compressive strength, and RCPT.

The cube specimens having (50 mm × 50 mm × 50 mm) dimension were fabricated using TiO2-ECC in agreement with the BS EN 12390-354 guidelines to study the material’s compressive strength after 28 days. The direct tensile test used dog-bone-shaped samples measuring 420 mm × 120 mm × 30 mm, executed in accordance with the JSCE55 protocol. The assessment was performed at a regulated loading frequency of 0.15 mm/minute using a 200 kN-capacity Universal Testing Machine (UTM) fitted with integrated linear variable differential transformers (LVDTs). During the evaluation, a computer gathered and analysed real-time test data. Furthermore, the compressive strength and weight loss of the cubical specimens (50 mm × 50 mm × 50 mm) caused by acid attack were assessed. To assess the weight loss, all specimens were submerged in a 10% sulfuric acid (H2SO4) mixture, while their monthly reduction and loss of compressive strength were monitored. After 28 days of standard curing, the outer surface humidity from all concrete sample were also removed and cleaned away. Through pH analysis, the pH value of 3 samples of ECC containing different concentrations of TiO2 nanomaterial was ascertained. Following the grinding of ECC samples into a powder, 10-g powder were mixed in 100 millilitres distilled water while being agitated for ten minutes. Using a pH metre, the pH of the solutions was subsequently determined. Additionally, cube-shaped and bar (prism) specimens were fabricated and submerged in to a 10% sodium sulphate (Na2SO4) chemical, respectively, in order to assess the expansion and loss in compressive strength. The variation in sample dimension and compressive strength were documented monthly. Additionally, the concrete samples having cylindrical disc design with dimension of 100 × 50 mm were wet-cured initially for a duration of 28 days in order to conduct the RCPT test. AASHTO (T277-15)56 as well as ASTM (C1202-19)57 were utilised to conduct Rapid chloride permeability analysis. Before proceeding, quick setting epoxy were utilised to coat the concrete sections. Following the curing of the sealant coating, the cylindrical sample was subjected to the vacuum chamber for a duration of 3 h minimum, or till it ceased to exhibit excessive stickiness upon contact. Following this, the cylinder was inserted into the testing device containing 2 different cells that interacted with the 2 uncoated surfaces of the disc. The anode of the cell is composed of a 3% of weight of NaCl mixture in distilled water. The cathode of the cell is a 0.3N NaOH content in distilled water. Subsequently, the observing equipment was linked to a constant 60-V direct current (DC) power source for a period of 06 h. Throughout this time, the researchers measured the cumulative electric charge flowing through the disc specimen in coulombs at 30-min intervals. The overall charge denotes the amount of chloride ions that entered composite sample, as observed by the investigators58. Additionally, to assess the water absorption ability of ECC containing TiO2, three cubes from every batch were subjected to a designated process. In the beginning, these cubes were subjected to oven drying for 24 h at 105 °C to determine their original weight, which served as the baseline for evaluation. Thereafter, all specimens were immersed in water for 24 h to attain saturation. Thereafter, the ultimate mass of the samples was recorded as the dry weight of the saturated surface. The percentage of weight loss indicated the extent of water absorption by the specimens59. These samples were carefully dried at 105 °C to prevent any morphological modifications in the TiO₂ samples that may result from elevated temperatures, hence assuring precise water absorption evaluations60. Additionally, an additional set of three specimens was used to determine the apparent porosity by following ASTM C948-8161 procedure. Equation (1) was used to determine the apparent porosity (AP), yielding valuable information into the material’s pore geometry and its water retention capability.

$$Apparent Porosity = \left| {\frac{{W_{i} - W_{d} }}{{W_{i} - W_{s} }}} \right| \times 100\%$$
(1)

where Wi = Weight of the specimen during a 48-h immersion in water. Wd = Weight of the sample after moisture removal by exposure to an oven at 105 °C for 24 h. Ws = Weight of the specimen when suspended in water.

Results and discussions

Compressive strength (CS)

The CS of composites containing 1% to 2% of PVA fiber by fraction of volume and different proportions of TiO2 nanoparticles after 28 days is illustrated in Fig. 1. The highest calculated strength of ECC combined with 1% of PVA fiber was noted by 62 MPa at 1.50% TiO2 as nanomaterial, while the lowest strength of composites contained 2% of PVA fiber was found by 39.40 MPa at 2% TiO2 as nanoparticle. There is argument regarding the optimal compressive strength achieved by adding 1.50% TiO2 to composites. Research also suggests that the strength of the mixture gradually reduces with subsequent additions of TiO2 to the ECC. The following factors optimise the strength of ECC when combined with 1.5% TiO2 as nanoparticle. (i) TiO2's role: The formidable mechanical characteristics of TiO2 make a substantial contribution to the reinforcement of the cement matrix. The wrinkly TiO2 interconnecting multiple phases within the cement matrix may result in an increase in fracture surface hardness. (ii) The influence of pore-filling: The nanoscale nature of TiO2 facilitates its frequent and effortless infiltration into the cementitious matrix’s pore spaces, leading to enhanced densification. This further enhances the mechanical properties of the densified matrix. Consequently, TiO2 significantly contributes to filling the ECC mixture with mechanical properties. Furthermore, elevated levels of TiO2 incorporation can lead to TiO2 aggregation within the cementitious matrix. As a result, inadequate TiO2 dispersion reduces the CS of the ECC. It was detected that ECC with 1% PVA fiber and different amounts of TiO2 had higher CS after each curing time than the ECC mixture with 1.5% PVA fiber and different amounts of TiO2. According to the results, an ECC mix with 1.5% PVA fiber has a higher CS than one with 2% PVA fiber and unknown amounts of TiO2. Furthermore, ECC aggregated with 1% PVA fiber and different amounts of TiO2 has higher CS than ECC mixtures with 1.5% and 2% PVA fiber and several amounts of TiO2. The study shows that the CS goes down as the percentage of PVA fiber in composites with numerous contents of TiO2 rises. This reduction in the ECC mixture’s CS is the result of increasing the amount of PVA fiber, which generates more spaces, consequently reducing its CS. Moreover, the clustering behaviour of the fibers, which creates vulnerability areas within the mixture where the cementitious matrix is in short supply, is responsible for the observed strength reduction at elevated fiber concentrations. Numerous studies have proved that flocculated TiO2 significantly less effectively develop the mechanical properties of matrix than uniformly dispersed TiO262. In a similar fashion, Sorathiya et al.62 increased the CS of cement by 22.6% during the curing period of 28 days by substituting 1% of the cement with TiO2. The research by Rawat et al.52, Baikerikar et al.63 and Orakzai64 is in line with these findings.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Compressive Strength of ECC containing TiO2.

Tensile strength (TS)

The TS of composites containing 1–2% of PVA fiber by fraction of volume and different proportions of TiO2 nanoparticles after 28 days is illustrated in Fig. 2. The highest calculated strength of ECC combined with 1% of PVA fiber was noted by 5.46 MPa at 1.50% TiO2 as nanomaterial, while the lowest strength of composites contained 2% of PVA fiber was found by 3.625 MPa at 2% TiO2 as nanoparticle. There is argument regarding the optimal TS achieved by adding 1.50% TiO2 to composites. This enhancement in TS is due to pore filling influence of TiO2 at nanoscale in ECC, leading to enhanced densification. This further enhances the mechanical properties of the densified matrix. Furthermore, elevated levels of TiO2 incorporation can lead to TiO2 aggregation within the cementitious matrix. As a result, inadequate TiO2 dispersion reduces the TS of the ECC. It was detected that ECC with 1% PVA fiber and different amounts of TiO2 had higher TS after each curing time than the ECC with 1.5% PVA fiber and different amounts of TiO2. According to the results, an ECC mix with 1.5% PVA fiber has a higher TS than mixture combined with 2% PVA fiber and various amounts of TiO2. Furthermore, ECC aggregated with 1% PVA fiber and different amounts of TiO2 has higher TS than ECC mixtures with 1.5% and 2% PVA fiber and numerous amounts of TiO2. The study shows that the TS goes down as the percentage of PVA fiber in ECC composites with numerous contents of TiO2 rises. This reduction in the TS of ECC is the result of increasing the amount of PVA fiber, which generates more spaces owing to the balling effect and inadequate bonding to ECC with the addition of 2% PVA fiber to ECC65. The reduced density of ECC at elevated fiber levels may contribute to the decline in TS during cracking. Numerous studies have proved that flocculated TiO2 significantly less effectively develop the mechanical assets of matrix than uniformly dispersed TiO262. Researchers64 conducted similar findings.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Tensile Strength of ECC containing TiO2.

Weight loss analysis

Cubic specimens composed of TiO2-ECC were utilised to determine the weight loss caused by acid attacks. Figure 3 illustrates the results of a 1-month assessment of the weight loss of each specimen. Conversely, the TiO2-ECC integrated with 2% PVA fiber experienced a maximum weight loss of 10% at 2% TiO2, while the TiO2-ECC reinforced with 1% PVA fiber consistently showed a minimum weight loss of 7% at 1% TiO2 as nanoparticles after 28 days. Research shows that when TiO2-ECC incorporates 1% PVA fiber by volume fraction, acid attack causes the least amount of weight loss, compared to when TiO2-ECC incorporates 1.5% and 2% PVA fiber during production. In addition, the weight loss of mixtures M2, M4, M7, M8, and M13 was significantly greater than that of the other proportions. Due to its alkaline nature, TiO2-ECC is vulnerable to acidic attacks. The reaction between acid and calcareous substances produces calcium salts. The salts decrease the cohesiveness of the cement matrix and the density of the ECC. In addition, the C–S–H solution combine with sulfuric acid, resulting in a brittle gel and a reduction in the strength of TiO2-based composites. Besides, the presence of disintegrating calcium salts, namely calcium sulphate, leads to the formation of reaction products such as gypsum and ettringite. The occurrence of these reaction outcomes caused ECC’s density enhancement, thereby enhancing the reaction of hydration in the ECC mix. The Ettringite process and gypsum further reduced the porosity in ECC. Moreover, ECC experiences a marginal increase in mass while exposed to an acidic solution66. Equations (2) and (3) mathematically describe the reaction between ECC and a sulfuric acid solution67.

$${\text{Ca}}\left( {{\text{OH}}} \right)_{2} + {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{SO}}_{4} \to {\text{CaSO}}_{4} *2{\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}}$$
(2)
$$3{\text{CaO}}*2{\text{SiO}}_{2} *3{\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}} + {\text{H}}_{2} {\text{SO}}_{4} \to {\text{CaSO}}_{4} *2{\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}} + {\text{Si}}\left( {{\text{OH}}} \right)_{4}$$
(3)
Fig. 3
figure 3

Weight Loss of ECC containing TiO2 due to Acid Attack.

The results obtained from this experiment can be ascribed to the examination of the fluctuations in the concentrations parameters (PVA and TiO2). The microcracking of the specimens caused by the increased PVA particle content in the ECC enabled acidic media to permeate more deeply. Conversely, the ECC blended with a reduced percentage of PVA mix exhibited a diminished occurrence of fractures and a more difficult time separating the constituent elements, thereby leading to a reduced extent of weight loss as a result of deterioration. In addition, the TiO2 in the composition enhanced the ECC’s resistance to degradation under extreme conditions, such as acidic environments. Due to ECC degradation, compositions containing less TiO2 experienced greater proportions of weight loss, whereas samples containing more TiO2 exhibited more durability. By comparing mixtures containing 1% PVA with varying concentrations of TiO2, it was determined that mixtures with a higher TiO2 content exhibited superior weight loss results.

Compressive strength due to acid attack

Figure 4 illustrates the outcomes of a CS on ECC samples that underwent an acidic attack with a duration of 28 days. It is very imperative to assess the strength and properties of the all prepared TiO2-ECC samples after an acid attack to find out how much damage was done and how fast the samples are breaking down. Twenty-eight days after being submerged in a 10% sulfuric acid solution, samples were evaluated for CS. Figure 5 illustrates the CS of CM and samples exposed to acid attack, along with the corresponding fraction reduction in CS on 28 days. A typical control sample experienced a reduction in CS of up to 12%. After 28 days of incorporating 1.50% TiO2 nanoparticles, the acid attack reduces the CS degradation of composites reinforced with 1% PVA to a minimum of 6.50%. The decrease in CS loss was observed in the TiO2-ECC sample, which comprises 1.50% TiO2 by weight of cement, after a 28-day acid attack. Adding TiO2 as a nanoparticle enhance to the ECC mixture also makes it less likely that the CS will decrease when it is attacked by acid, compared to CM. Furthermore, the addition of 1.50% TiO2 to the ECC mixture increased hydration in all mechanical properties. Another thing is that the TiO2-ECC sample showed better resistance to degradation and compressive forces after being attacked by acid for 28 days. The samples of ECC contained with 1.50 percent TiO2 demonstrate a 6.50 percent reduction in CS loss. The integration of TiO2 into ECC significantly reduced degradation and enhanced sulfuric acid resistance. Furthermore, researchers attribute the decrease in CS in acid-attacked concrete samples to enhance in porosity and micro-voids68. Anatomically, Aiken et al.69 and Chintalapudi and Pannem70 documented comparable outcomes.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Compressive Strength of ECC containing TiO2 due to Acid Attack.

Fig. 5
figure 5

CS Loss Rate in Percentages after Acid Attack.

pH assessment

The assessment of acidic attacks that could cause significant damage to reinforced concrete requires ECC’s power of hydrogen (pH) value measurement. This is due to the fact that embedded steel exhibits sustained durability exclusively at pH levels of 9 or higher. As shown in Fig. 6, concrete samples comprised of ECC containing 0–2% TiO2 nanoparticles were monitored for pH value after 28 days. At 1%, 1.5%, and 2% TiO2 as nanomaterial, the pH value of matrix contains with 1% PVA fiber was 10.20, 9.95, and 9.48, respectively, which was consistently lower than CM at 28 days. In a similar way, the pH result for ECC reinforced with 1.5% PVA fiber and 1%, 1.50%, and 2% TiO2 nanoparticles was found by 10.40, 10.10, and 9.85 which is consistently lower than CM at 28 days correspondingly. Research has demonstrated that when 1% PVA fiber is used to accumulate TiO2 nanoparticles in ECC, the resulting pH value is lower than 1.5% PVA fiber utilized in ECC with the addition of various amounts of TiO2 nanoparticles. Furthermore, the pH values of ECC incorporated with 2% PVA fiber recorded by 10.75, 10.30, and 10.08, when 1%, 1.50%, and 2% TiO2 were used as nanoparticles on 28 days respectively. After 28 days, the pH values of all mixtures consistently reduced in comparison to the CM. It has been determined that the addition of different concentrations of TiO2 to ECC results in a greater accumulation of PVA fibers, as the pH value increases due to the nanoparticles. However, it is worth noting that these all-pH values are lesser than CM. Furthermore, it is observed that the pH level of composites combined with varying percentages of PVA fiber is reduced as the concentration of TiO2 nanoparticles rises. The drop-in pH rate observed in composites comprised with different percentages of PVA fiber can be accredited to the refining of TiO2 at a nanoscale. This effect effectively covers the openings in ECC and protects it from acid attack and environmental degradation, both of which contribute to the pH reading reduction. Wan et al.71 reported that carbonation has the capability to decrease the pH reading from 13.20 to 8.0. It can be concluded that the carbonation is not only induces a reduction in pH but also liberates chloride ions. The collective impact of chloride ingress and carbonation speed up the rust rate of steel and decreases the life of structures. Kumari et al.72 demonstrated that as the proportion of nanomaterials in concrete replacement increased to 2%, there was an initial increase in pH followed by a gradual reduction. An analogous form of investigation was undertaken by Zeng et al.73.

Fig. 6
figure 6

pH reading of Composites containing TiO2.

Rapid chloride penetration test (RCPT)

The objectives of this research examined the impact of nanoscale particle on the ECC’s water transport properties. The effects of water transport through the ECC samples combined with TiO2 were observed. Once chloride ions penetrate the ECC, it need to bind to various products from hydration. So, the overall chloride ions that get into ECC are made up of bound chloride ions and the amount of free chloride ions that are in the pores. Free chloride ions permeating rebar and passing through ECC pores initiate rusting. It is calculated chloride permeability in agreement with ASTM C120257 using acid-soluble chloride74.

This investigation recorded the applied current discharge in 6 h as an indicator of chloride permeability. Figure 7 illustrates the RCPT of composites contained various content of TiO2 as nanoscale component at 28 days. However, the RCPT reading for CM and ECC containing TiO2 that adhere to ASTM C120257 for low chloride permeability varied between 968 and 1850 coulombs. Moreover, an increased TiO2 concentration during ECC synthesis reduces chloride ion permeability. The RCPT readings of composites contained 1% PVA fiber were noted by 1278, 968, and 1365 Coulombs at 1%, 1.50%, and 2% TiO2 respectively, which is lower than CM. Similarly, the RCPT values of matrix mixed with 1.5% PVA fiber and 1%, 1.50%, and 2% TiO2 nanoparticles were always lower than those of the CM on 28 days. In addition, the RCPT of composites with 2% PVA fiber at level of 1%, 1.50%, and 2% dropped as compared to reference mixture. It has been realized that an increasing quantity of TiO2 in composites, which leads to a decrease in RCPT. The decrease in microporous interconnectivity and microstructural densification of ECC is responsible for the decline in RCPT values. The use of TiO2, as nanoparticles with nanoscale dimensions, to form a microstructure that was densely packed and compact, thereby demonstrating enhanced resistance to chloride penetration. To determine the RCPT, Khotbehsara et al.74 discussed the use of nanomaterials such as SnO2, ZrO2, and CaCO3 in self-compacting mortar. Nevertheless, beyond a certain threshold, the RCPT value decreased as the nanomaterial concentration increased. As previously mentioned, nanomaterials function as fillers to increase the structure’s density and fill in any gaps. Additionally, they facilitate the hydration process. This expedites the formation of a more developed pore structure, which reduces the amount of chloride ion transport. This study’s results suggest the incorporation of nanoparticles into cement mortars to enhance the resistance against infiltration of chloride ions. A portion of the chloride ions binds to the composites, which slows the diffusion rate. Prior research75 reported that the permeability of chloride of glass powder-containing concrete mixtures was lesser than CM. Miyandehi et al.76 documented a substantial reduction in the quantity of transmitted charge upon the introduction of copper oxide nanoparticles.

Fig. 7
figure 7

RCPT of ECC containing TiO2.

Expansion of TiO2-ECC

Figure 8 illustrates the expansion resulting from the sulphate attack on the accumulation of ECC matrix with varying concentrations of TiO2 nanomaterials. Alternatively, it found the expansion of prism length prior and after their submergence in a 10% sodium sulphate solution over a 28-day period. The percentage increase was subsequently calculated. Based on the study outcomes, M5 (1.50% TiO2 and 1% PVA) had the lowest expansion of about 0.0038%. In contrast, M13 (2% TiO2 and 2% PVA) displayed the most substantial expansion, with an expansion percentage of 0.0072%. Furthermore, the samples denoted as M4 (2% TiO2 and 1% PVA fiber), and M9 (2% TiO2 and 2% PVA fiber) demonstrated the most substantial increment in ECC production after a duration of 28 days. Analogous patterns were noted in77. The presence of 1%, 1.5%, and 2% fiber, along with TiO2 in the range of 1% to 2%, may account for the observed results. Coats containing a higher concentration of PVA expand more rapidly due to the micropores that surround the sample’s surface, facilitating improved absorption of immersed media. As the extent of PVA increases, there are more micro-voids in the mixture, resulting in a higher degree of expansion. The study concluded that concrete mixtures containing PVA at a concentration exceeding 1% expanded more than the control sample. Furthermore, the integration of TiO2 into the concrete lead to in a reduction in expansion due to the concrete’s resistance to infiltration caused by sulphate attack. During the dissolution and establishment phases of ECC containing TiO2, a reduction in free water led to a rise in electrical resistivity. As the hydration process increases, solid by-products build up and porosity decreases. This makes it harder for ions to move through the TiO2 paste-containing ECC, which raises the resistance. A higher concentration of TiO2 in concrete may mitigate the effects of expansion caused by sulphate suspension infiltration. Additionally, the formation of ettringite-filled fissures and fractures on the surface of the cement composite contributed to the increase in length change78,79. Furthermore, the formation of ettringites, which occupy a more area, contributes to the expansion and fracture characteristics of concrete80. This is in line with prior study that has examined the effects of sulphate on concrete66,81.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Expansion of ECC containing TiO2 due to Sulphate Attack.

Compressive strength of TiO2-ECC due to sulphate attack (SA)

A comparison is made between the CS reduction due to SA in composites and CS without SA specimens that underwent 28 days of water curing. Figure 9 illustrates the result. The reduction is relatively minor, amounting to a meagre 1.50% TiO2 as nanoparticles, when compared to CM. However, after a period of 28 days, the control mix experiences a substantial decline of 3.23%. After 28 days, the CS of an ECC mixture containing 1% PVA fiber consistently decreases by 2%, 3%, and 4% at 1%, 1.50%, and 2%, respectively as shown in Fig. 10. Similarly, at 28 days, the strength of ECC incorporated with 1.5% PVA decreases by 4%, 4.05%, and 4.10%, respectively, when 1%, 1.50%, and 2% TiO2 nanoparticles are added to ECC. An identical pattern is observed in TiO2-ECC that is fortified with 2% PVA fiber. The results indicate that the addition of 1.50% TiO2 could potentially offer substantial protection against sulphate attack. In addition, ECC performance frequently degrades, and the immersion time is prolonged when exposed to a chemical assault because of physical degradation and unintended chemical degradation of composites. As illustrated in Fig. 10, the introduction of TiO2 resulted in an augmentation of resistance against sulphate attack. The CS of water-cured concrete mixtures was compared to the results of CS tests conducted 28 days after sulphate assaults on the mixtures. It was demonstrated that the magnitude of the loss in CS increased in CM as compared to ECC combined with the TiO2. Moreover, the sulphate attack induces the liberation of calcium constituents from C–S–H gels, ensuing in a decrease in the rigidity of the composites and subsequent degradation of the samples82. Honglei et al.83 identified two strata of gypsum accompanied by minute amounts of ettringite and monosulfate. Sulphate attack is characterised by a reduction in adhesion and strength, in contrast to the formation of fissures and thickening76. The sulphate reactions altered each of the compounds, which led to a reduction in CS. These outcomes are analogous to these prior investigations84,85.

Fig. 9
figure 9

CS of ECC containing TiO2 due to SA.

Fig. 10
figure 10

CS Loss Rate in Percentages after SA.

Apparent porosity (AP)

Figure 11 illustrates the apparent porosity of ECC, which includes varying amounts of PVA fiber and TiO2 as a nanomaterial, after a 28-day duration. Notably, the porosity of all mixes including TiO2 was inferior to that of the control mixture. Despite this, adding PVA fiber made the concrete more porous. This was because the higher volume fraction of PVA fiber caused more air to be trapped in the ECC mixture. This characteristic led to an increase in capillary water levels, which in turn increased the porosity as the concentration of PVA fiber increased. The inclusion of TiO2 at nanoscale in composite caused in a considerable reduction in porosity across all PVA fiber levels. The reduction in porosity may be attributed to TiO2 nanoparticles functioning as efficient fillers. At smaller dosages, TiO₂ nanoparticles exhibit superior dispersion, efficiently occupying voids and refining the pore morphology. Nevertheless, as the amount rises to 2%, agglomeration becomes more evident. These agglomerates produce weak zones and interfacial flaws, resulting in enhanced porosity. Mohammadi et al.86 conducted research that demonstrated a decrease in overall porosity upon the incorporation of titanium dioxide into calcium phosphate cement. These discoveries align with findings from prior studies by Nazari and Riahi, which noted a reduction in porosity when PC was partly replaced by TiO2 at varying concentrations. Their findings indicated that a reduction in porosity was attained with a 3% dosage of TiO2, resulting in decreases of 5.67% in porosity. Similar findings were reported by other scholars60,87.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Apparent Porosity of ECC containing TiO2.

The relationship between apparent porosity and compressive strength is illustrated in Fig. 12. Figure 12 illustrates a strong connection between apparent porosity and compressive strength after 28 days. The equations in Fig. 12 will aid in forecasting the compressive strength or apparent porosity whenever one of these characteristics is identified. The experimental results demonstrated a favourable relationship regarding the regression curve outcomes. The test findings assessed the strength and porosity performance of concrete incorporating TiO₂ and PVA fiber in varying amounts inside composites. Similarly, the linear relationship between apparent porosity and durability indicator (RCPT) is shown in Fig. 13. Figure 13 illustrates a robust connection between apparent porosity and durability indicator (RCPT) on 28 days. The equations in Fig. 13 will help in predicting the apparent porosity or durability indicator (RCPT) if one of them is identified. The outcomes evaluated the apparent porosity and durability indicator (RCPT) performance of concrete containing TiO₂ and PVA fiber in different proportions in composites.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Relationship between AP and CS.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Correlations between the durability indicator (RCPT) and AP.

Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP)

The MIP assessment was performed on a particular set of samples to examine the features of the pores and analyse the effects of input variables on the structure and distribution of the pores. The most direct method for understanding pore size distribution is to analyse the pore size distribution curve (PSDC), as illustrated in Fig. 14. Moreover, pore distribution is essential as it affects the permeability of the microstructure. The pore size distribution curve for the control sample, as illustrated in Fig. 14, reveals a total pore volume of 191.55 mm3/g. Moreover, the composite has a uniform distribution of pores of differing dimensions. However, the incorporation of 1.5% TiO₂ and 2% PVA fibers resulted in a reduction of the entire pore volume to 110.80 mm3/g. Furthermore, TiO₂ resulted in a reduction of pore amount throughout the 100–1000 nm range, thereby increasing the proportion of smaller voids measuring less than 100 nm, as illustrated in Fig. 14. The findings demonstrate TiO₂'s ability to improve hydration and nanofiller functions, leading to pore refining. At smaller dosages, TiO₂ nanoparticles exhibit superior dispersion, efficiently occupying voids and refining the pore morphology. Nevertheless, as the amount rises to 2%, agglomeration becomes more evident. These agglomerates produce weak zones and interfacial flaws, resulting in enhanced porosity. Moreover, it is notable that the increase in PVA fiber concentration led to a proportional enhancement in the total pore volume. The results presented in Fig. 14 prove this observation, indicating that the sample composed of ECC with 1% PVA fiber and 1% TiO₂ demonstrated the entire pore volume of 98.20 mm3/g, whereas the specimen comprising 2% PVA fiber and 1% TiO₂ revealed an overall pore volume of 148.20 mm3/g. The outcomes correspond with those reported by Long et al.88, indicating that the incorporation of PVA fiber during the procedure of mixing significantly increases air content. This increase in air fraction ultimately results in heightened porosity and finally permeability of ECC. Therefore, the addition of TiO2 in composites which decreases the pore size, considerably reduces the pore connectivity and decreasing the permeability of composites.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Pore Distribution of Composites blended with TiO2.

Optimization utilizing response surface methodology (RSM)

The RSM framework comprises a collection of mathematical and statistical methodologies utilised to construct analytic models89,90,91. These methodologies rely on a response, or output, that is linked to a multitude of independent input parameters. By utilising this methodology, one can assess the influence of every variable as well as the interrelation among them on the outcome92. In this investigation, prediction models and optimisation of the CS, RCPT, sulphate attack, and acid attack, as well as the quantities of TiO2 and PVA in the TiO2-ECC, were accomplished via RSM. The optimisations and design strategies were generated with the assistance of design expert software. The optimisation process comprises three fundamental stages: (1) conducting an experimental investigation that is statistically devised; (2) determining the values of the variables in a scientific approach; and (3) predicting the outcomes of the model and confirming its appropriateness93,94. The statistical approaches may suggest that the relationship between responses and independent factors is either linear or a higher-degree polynomial. The 1st order equation signifying the linear model is illustrated by Eq. (4). In Eq. (5), the polynomial equations are expressed. Response models are represented by the y sign; the coded values of the input factors are denoted as xi and xj; the linear and quadratic parameters are denoted as i and j; the intercept on the y-axis is denoted as βo; the number of independent factors utilised in approach is denoted by k; and the error in the produced model is denoted as:

$$y = \beta_{0} + \beta_{1} x_{2} + \beta_{2} x_{2} + \beta_{n} x_{n} + \epsilon$$
(4)
$$y = \beta_{0} + \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{k} \beta_{i} x_{i} + \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{k} \beta_{ii} x_{i}^{2} + \mathop \sum \limits_{j = 2}^{k} \mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{j = 1} \beta_{ij} x_{i} x_{j} + \epsilon$$
(5)

Following the determination of the variables’ statistical significance with a p-value of 0.05, a variance analysis was performed. In determining the significance of model responses, the fundamental and interacting characteristics of the parameters with p-values below 0.05 were observed as crucial, while those with p-values exceeding 0.05 were considered inconsequential95,96. Prediction models only consider pertinent terms, except for those necessary for the model’s structure. The experimental parameters that were considered were TiO2 and PVA. In this investigation, the following variables were studied: expansion, weight loss, CS, CS resulting from sulphate attack, pH test, and RCPT. Thirteen random mixtures were generated by the software, with five duplicates for every response. The principal targets utilised by software to improve the response of the experiment to potential deviations are the five duplicates.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA)

The primary aim of RSM is to construct models and conduct ANOVA on them. In contrast, the CS and durability properties of ECC mixtures containing varying proportions of PVA fiber and TiO2 nanoparticles (ranging from 1 to 2%) were investigated for the purpose of RSM modelling and optimisation. Furthermore, for calculating CS, TS, CS due to acid attack, RCPT, CS due to SA, and AP quadratic models were considered the most appropriate. On the other hand, for calculating expansion and weight loss response, linear models were regarded more suitable. Additionally, the encoding of each of these responses can be found in Eqs. (6) through (14). By defining equations in terms of coded components, the impact of altering parameter quantities can be predicted. By default, the lowest values of the components are indicated as − 1, whereas the maximum values are presented as + 1. By applying the corresponding weightings to the factor variables, the coded equations can be utilized to find the comparative importance of the parameters. The input factors A and B are TiO2 and PVA, respectively. Details of the ANOVA results is given in Table 3.

Table 3 ANOVA Results.

A prototype or model factor is considered significant if its frequency falls below 5%. Pending this, each generated model possesses statistical significance since its probability is less than 0.05. The statistical significance of the model elements A, B, AB, A2, and B2 pertains to the compressive strength model. Therefore, A, B, AB, A2, and B2 are the crucial model parameters for the TS, AP, CS due to sulphate attack, pH test, and CS due to acid attack models, respectively. Consequently, the most consequential model parameters for the weight loss and expansion models are denoted as A and B, respectively. The determination coefficient (R2) serves as a substantial indicator of performance. The R2 coefficient, represented as a percentage ranging from 0 to 1, assesses the degree of correspondence between the model and the empirical data (0–100%). The fit is more optimal when the value is greater, and conversely, when the value is lower. R2 and additional model evaluation variables are detailed in Table 4. R2 values for the following variables for each model: CS, TS, weight loss, CS resulting from sulphate attack, RCPT, weight gain, expansion, CS due to acid attack, pH test, and AP ranges from 97 to 99% respectively. Furthermore, "Adeq. Precision" performs the computation of the signal-to-noise ratio. A ratio exceeding four is preferred97. The Adeq precision values for the following variables are presented in Table 4. The results of this study indicate that the models demonstrate proficiency and can be effectively employed to predict reactions.

$$CS = + 58.52 - 5.85 \times A - 3.84 \times B - 1.01 \times AB - 8.69 \times A^{2} - 0.15 \times B^{2}$$
(6)
$$TS = + 5.35 - 0.44 \times A - 0.31 \times B - 0.092 \times AB - 0.85 \times A^{2} - 0.058 \times B^{2}$$
(7)
$$Weight Loss = + 7.43 + 0.47 \times A + 1.11 \times B - 0.22 \times AB + 1.41 \times A^{2} - 0.083 \times B^{2}$$
(8)
$$CS due to Acid Attack = + 54.55 - 5.69 \times A - 3.80 \times B - 0.84 \times AB - 8.82 \times A^{2} + 0.28 \times B^{2}$$
(9)
$$pH = + 10.12 - 0.32 \times A + 0.25 \times B$$
(10)
$$RCPT = + 1091.04 + 34.26 \times A + 145.73 \times B - 28.09 \times AB + 431.50 \times A^{2} - 31.10 \times B^{2}$$
(11)
$$Expansion = + 0.0042 + 0.0009 \times A + 0.0005 \times B + 0.00014 \times AB + 0.0015 \times A^{2} + 0.00004 \times B^{2}$$
(12)
$$CS due to Sulfate Attack = + 56.19 - 5.81 \times A - 4.05 \times B - 0.67 \times AB - 8.33 \times A^{2} + 0.084 \times B^{2}$$
(13)
$$AP = + 13.83 + 0.82 \times A + 1.66 \times B + 0.27 \times AB + 3.39 \times A^{2} - 0.086 \times B^{2}$$
(14)
Table 4 Models Validation Parameters.

The Actual versus Predicted Plot as revealed in Fig. 15a–i, which contrasts the performance of the developed models for CS, TS, weight loss, CS due acid attack, pH assessment, expansion, CS due to SA, RCPT, and AP are utilized as one of the model diagnostic tools in RSM to evaluate the quality and appropriation of the created models. In order to achieve a proper fit, the data points must be aligned with 45˚ appropriate line, which has narrow confidence level. The excellent relationship between the investigational information and the predicted outcomes from the approaches is demonstrated by the fact that the data points are precisely aligned with the line of fit in the actual versus predicted graphs for each of the developed models.

Fig. 15
figure 15figure 15

Actual against Predicted Plots for (a) CS, (b) TS, (c) Weight Loss, (d) CS due to acid attack, (e) pH Value, (f) Expansion, (g) CS due to Sulphate attack, (h) RCPT, and (i) AP.

Alternatively, a 2D graph or a 3D graph can provide a more lucid representation of the effect of the interaction between the variables on the response. Identical to the 2D contour plot, but from a three-dimensional standpoint, is the 3D response surface plot. The investigation presented in Figs. 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24 illustrates the 2D graphs and 3D diagrams for each of the developed response predictive models. In the context of 2D and three-dimensional response surface diagrams, regions which symbolise distinct intensities of the response resulting from the interaction of the input variables are denoted by colour coding. The zones denoted in red represent areas with the greatest magnitudes of responses, whereas the regions in blue correspond to areas with the least intense responses. Diagrammatically, the interactions between the input variables and their effects on the responses are in perfect accordance with the previously discussed variables’ effects on the CS, TS, RCPT, sulphate attack, acid attack tests, and porosity.

Fig. 16
figure 16

(a) 2D graph and (b) 3D graph for CS using Design Expert Software Version 10.

Fig. 17
figure 17

(a) 2D graph and (b) 3D graph for TS using Design Expert Software Version 10.

Fig. 18
figure 18

(a) 2D graph and (b) 3D graph for weight loss using Design Expert Software Version 10.

Fig. 19
figure 19

(a) 2D graph and (b) 3D graph for CS due Acid Attack using Design Expert Software Version 10.

Fig. 20
figure 20

(a) 2D graph and (b) 3D graph for pH Test using Design Expert Software Version 10.

Fig. 21
figure 21

(a) 2D graph and (b) 3D graph for RCPT using Design Expert Software Version 10.

Fig. 22
figure 22

(a) 2D graph and (b) 3D graph for expansion using Design Expert Software Version 10.

Fig. 23
figure 23

(a) 2D graph and (b) 3D graph for CS due to SA using Design Expert Software Version 10.

Fig. 24
figure 24

(a) 2D graph and (b) 3D graph for AP using Design Expert Software Version 10.

Optimization

In order to establish the highest findings for desirable parameters, it is designed to determine the optimum values of input factors. The achievement of the target function (CS, TS, CS due to acid attack, weight loss, pH assessment, CS due to SA, expansion, RCPT, and porosity) is facilitated through the establishment of purposes for input parameters that vary in significance and condition. Using the desirability value (where 0 ≤ dj ≤ 1), the optimisation is assessed. A higher outcome is indicated by a value approaching one98.

Table 5 outlines the rationale and standards that underpin the optimisation process for this particular instance. As a result, the mechanism may ascertain the optimal quantity to achieve the specified objectives, even though the utilisation of TiO2 and PVA fiber has been limited to a range of 1% to 2% and 1%, 1.5%, and 2%, respectively. According to the optimisation results, the highest values for CS, TS, CS due to acid attack, weight loss, pH assessment, CS due to SA, expansion, RCPT, and porosity were attained by containing 1.489% TiO2 and 1% PVA fiber in composites at 62.30 MPa, 5.62 MPa, 58.7 MPa, 6.22%, 9.88, 60.42 MPa, 0.0036%, 913.01 Coulombs, and 12.08% consistently. The degree to which the proposed solution and the actual result are comparable establishes the criteria for desirability. For optimum results, it is recommended to approach one with a desirability. Optimising the response is feasible, as indicated by the desirability value of 0.951. The 3D diagram for desirability is illustrated in the Fig. 25.

Table 5 Optimization TiO2 results.
Fig. 25
figure 25

3D diagram for the desirability of the optimization using Design Expert Software Version 10.

Conclusion

The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of TiO2 nanoparticles on the durability characteristics of ECC accumulated with 1–2% PVA fiber. Following the investigation, the key points were reached:

  • At 1.50% TiO2 nanoparticles in ECC, the optimal strength of composites accumulation with 1% PVA fiber is observed, whereas the minimal strength of composites accumulation with 1% PVA fiber is measured at 2% TiO2 nanoparticles. It has been suggested that the strongest ECCs are produced with a 1.50% TiO2 by weight of PC addition, and that as more TiO2 accumulates in ECC, the strength starts to decline.

  • The resistance to sulphate assault is attributed to the pozzolanic characteristics of TiO2 particles, which fill spaces in pores and hinder the entrance of ions. Increased quantities of TiO2 improve the stability of ECC in harsh environments, with increased TiO2 content leading to better resistance to weight loss and dimensional changes.

  • The production of ECC comprising varying concentrations of TiO2 as nanoparticles is aided by the increased use of PVA fibers; however, the observed all-pH values are lesser than CM. Furthermore, it has been detected that the pH of an ECC mixture containing PVA fiber in different proportions reduces as the amount of TiO2 rises.

  • More resistance to chloride ion penetration was attained through the utilisation of TiO2 nanoparticles. The chloride permeability values exhibited a decrease upon the introduction of nanoparticles of TiO2. All mixtures were categorised as having extremely low chloride permeability, apart from the control mixture which were categorised as having low permeability.

  • The porosity of ECC exhibited a decrease upon the introduction of nanoparticles of TiO2 while the porosity of ECC increases as increasing the quantity of fiber. Moreover, the porosity of all mixtures containing TiO2 and fiber were lower than control mixture.

  • To prediction the CS, RCPT, acid resistance, and sulphate resistance of ECC at the 28-day mark, RSM models were developed, with the accuracy contingent upon the ratios of PVA fibers and TiO2 utilised as nanomaterials. The difference between adjusted R2 to predicted R2 is less than 0.2 and confidence level of 95% for each model.

  • By incorporating 1.50% TiO2 in composites combined with 1% PVA fiber, the challenges associated with large-scale ECC implementation, and the detrimental effects of sulphate and acid attack may be mitigated. As a result, its implementation in the practical sectors of the construction industry is advised.

Future research

The integration of TiO₂ and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers in concrete offers a viable method for improving durability against harsh circumstances, including sulphate and acid attacks. Future research endeavours may concentrate on the following domains:

  • Perform comprehensive experimental investigations to assess the long-term efficacy of TiO₂ and PVA fiber-reinforced concrete subjected to cyclic wet-dry and freeze–thaw circumstances in sulphate and acidic environments.

  • Evaluate the time stability of TiO₂’s photocatalytic performance and its impact on alleviating degradation.

  • Investigate the synergistic effects of TiO₂ and PVA fibers on fracture resistance and self-healing properties in concrete subjected to sulphate and acid attacks.

  • Assess the ecological consequences of incorporating TiO₂ and PVA fibers using life cycle assessments (LCA) and explore alternate sources or recycling methods for these materials.

  • Examine the feasibility of integrating TiO₂ and PVA fibers with supplemental cementitious materials (SCMs) to enhance durability and minimize the carbon impact.