Table 4 Performance Analysis of SRB-VGG19 Dense ANL Model.
FGSM with different gradient \(\nabla\) | Defended Accuracy with ANL Layer | ||
---|---|---|---|
\(\nabla\)= 0 | \(\nabla\)= 2 | \(\nabla\)= 4 | |
SRB-VGG19 Dense | 97.53 | 97.11 | 96.47 |
SRB-VGG19 Dense ANL with \(\in\) =0.00 | 98.12 | 98.14 | 98.45 |
SRB-VGG19 Dense ANL with \(\in\) =0.01 | 98.43 | 98.34 | 98.31 |
SRB-VGG19 Dense ANL with \(\in\) =0.10 | 98.24 | 98.35 | 98.27 |
SRB-VGG19 Dense ANL with \(\in\) =0.15 | 98.33 | 98.24 | 98.18 |
SRB-VGG19 Dense ANL with \(\in\) =0.20 | 98.02 | 98.12 | 98.24 |
SRB-VGG19 Dense ANL with \(\in\) =0.25 | 98.45 | 98.36 | 98.41 |