Table 2 Risks weights (BWM results).

From: Innovative BWM–TOPSIS-based approach to determine the optimum delivery method for offshore projects

Risk category

Risk title

Weight

Consistency ratio

Development phase

Technical risks

Design errors

0.60

0.038

Changes in the scope of the project

0.40

Financial and economical risks

Changes in Economic policies

0.38

Currency Fluctuation

0.36

Suppliers Bid greater than estimate

0.26

Management risks

Improper Project Feasibility Study

0.21

Failure to select the type of implementation on the project contract

0.18

Improper project planning and budgeting and lack of accurate estimation of project value

0.18

Bad identification of equipment and material

0.16

Delay of tender offer evaluation and purchase order cycle

0.14

Low level of engagement of disciplines in planning across the project

0.12

Construction phase

External & site conditions

Lack of sufficient knowledge and information of field and reservoir structures

0.25

0.096

Delay of government permits

0.24

Environmental impact of the project

0.22

Weather effect on the project

0.16

Water Depth in the project area

0.13

Financial and economical risks

Project financing availability (debts & delayed payment on contract)

0.31

Cost over-run (bad initial cost estimation)

0.28

Currency fluctuation (foreign exchange rate)

0.22

Change in economic policies

0.19

Management risks

Bad application of safety

0.25

Failure to achieve the main target point

0.22

Bad start-up plan

0.19

Lack of engineering resource qualifications and pool depth

0.18

Delay of engineering designs during work

0.16

Technical risks

Bad quality control

0.27

Changes in the scope of the project

0.2

Design errors

0.19

Design changes during construction

0.18

Construction mistakes

0.16

Operation phase

External and site conditions risks

Environmental impact of the project

0.52

0.024

Weather effect on the project

0.28

Water Depth in the project area

0.2

Management risks

Bad application of safety

0.48

Inadequate qualifications of engineering experts

0.28

Technical risks

Bad quality control

0.42

Inappropriate operating methods

0.37

Failure to predict the exact time to run the project

0.24

Error in forecasting demands for service

0.21