Table 1 Summary of Insulator Contamination Assessment Literature.
Reference | Data Type | Method Used | Strength | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|
Acoustic and Ultrasonic Data | Wavelet Transform, SVR Stacking, AE Monitoring, Wavelet Transform, MRA Feature Extraction, Piezoelectric Sensor Acquisition | Reasonable Prediction Accuracy, Non Invasive Monitoring, Immune to electromagnetic Interference | Required High Quality AE sensor, Expensive, Sensitive to Ambient Noise, Sensitive to Signal Quality | |
Electromagnetic & Radio Frequency Data | Wideband electromagnetic radiation signature analysis; statistical analysis (mean and std. deviation), frequency spectrum analysis | Non-invasive; remote monitoring; high sensitivity; effective within 30 MHz to 130 MHz range | Requires specialized equipment; Expensive; sensitive to environmental noise; limited to specific insulator types; sensitive to environmental interference; requires filtering of outliers | |
Image Data | DL Models (YOLO, RetinaNet, ResNet); Custom CNNs; Support Machine Learning (SVM, k-NN); NNs (BPNN, RBFNN, ANN); Data Processing (Data Augmentation, Edge Detection, Histogram); Image Analysis Methods (Gabor Filters, Visible/IR Fusion); Feature Extraction (Eigenvalue Extraction) | High accuracy (up to 99.242%); robust under diverse lighting and environmental conditions; non-invasive methods; high discrimination accuracy for specific materials; effective across varying humidity levels. | Requires expensive high quality cameras; computational complexity; sensitive to environmental conditions; reliant on controlled lighting; inefficient in non uniform pollution. | |
Image Data (Hyperspectral/UV/IR) | DL Models (CNN, ResNet); Support Machine Learning (MLR, RF); NNs (RBFNN, BPNN, DBN, SAE); Data Processings (MSC, PCA, SPA, LDA); Image Analysis Methods (LatLRR, Image Filtering); Feature Extraction (Infrared Imaging, Fisher Criterion, KPCA, PSO) | Non-Contact Detection & High Accuracy (ESDD, NSDD); High Recognition Accuracy (up to 96.67%); High Accuracy in Varying Humidity Conditions. | Requires Specialized Equipment (Hyperspectral, IR, UV); Sensitive to Lighting and Environmental Conditions; Sensitive to Lightning; Extensive Image Preprocessing; Ineffective for Non Uniform Pollution | |
Partial Discharge | Deep Learning Models (CNN, LSTM); Real-Time Data Analysis (Fuzzy Inference System) | Portable; High Correlation Assessment; Non Invasive | Requires extensive data preprocessing; computationally intensive; limited to specific insulator types; Expensive Equipment; Not suitable for on line monitoring | |
1,2,5,23,24,25,26,27,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59 | Leakage Current Data | Support Machine Learning (RUSBoost, AdaBoost, Bagging, SVM, Random Forest, XGBoost); NNs (ANN, LSTM, GMDH, ANFIS, LS-SVM); Data Processings (PCA, K-means, Rough Set Theory, Statistical Analysis, Harmonic Analysis); Feature Extraction (FFT Analysis, Detrended Fluctuation Analysis, Wavelet Transform, Autocorrelation); Signal Processing Techniques (Short Time Modified Hilbert Transform, Sparse Representation); Innovative Approaches (Fuzzy Logic, D-S Evidence Theory, Particle Swarm Optimization). | High Accuracy (up to 96.82%); Real-Time Monitoring; Environmental Adaptability; Robust Classification; Low Computational Burden; Cheap Equipment; No sensitivity to non uniform pollution. | Invasive, Susceptible to Electromagnetic Noise; Require high performance data acquisition; Require experimental validation to check the accuracies for realistic datasets and multiple contamination levels |