Table 1 Activation energy Ea for single-crystal amphiboles, covering a broad range of Fe/(Fe + Mg) ratios, as reported in the literature.

From: The effect of anisotropic electrical conductivity of amphiboles on geophysical anomalies observed in subduction zones

Method

Sample identification

Fe/(Fe + Mg)

Ea (eV)

References

Impedance spectroscopy

arfvedsonite

~ 1

0.4 (σ||)

Schmidbauer et al.24

edenitic-hornblende

0.75

0.58 (σ||)

Schmidbauer et al.25

edenite

0.36

0.70–0.80

Hu et al.22

kaersutite

0.25

0.61 (σ||)

Schmidbauer et al.25

Mg-hornblende

0.22

0.73–1.06 (σ||)

Schmidbauer et al.25

tremolite

0.01

3.79

Shen et al.31

dc electrical resistance

riebeckite (crocidolite)

~ 1*

0.69 (σ||)

Littler and Williams43

riebeckite

~ 1*

0.9 (σ||)

Parkhomenko45

riebeckite

0.95

0.77 (σ||)

Della Ventura et al.26

riebeckite

0.95

0.53 (σ||) (300–720 K)

This work

not given

0.19

0.54(σ||) and 0.57(σ)

Tolland27

  1. The corresponding conductivity data are given in Fig. 4. An asterisk indicates an assumed value (not shown in Fig. 4).