Table 4 The variance analysis (ANOVA) between the sites of group A and group B in each year, as well as the two years according to several zooplankton criteria.

From: Evaluating the restoration of Lake Manzala after dredging using water quality parameters and zooplankton changes

Comparison criteria

Group AVs Group B in 2015

Group AVs Group B in 2022

2015 vs 2022

P value

Significant

P value

Significant

P value

Significant

Saline spp. abundance

0.000

Yes

0.000

Yes

0.000

Yes

Number of saline spp.

0.070

No

0.001

Yes

0.000

Yes

Freshwater spp. abundance

0.000

Yes

0.000

Yes

0.000

Yes

Number of Freshwater spp.

0.000

Yes

0.000

Yes

0.036

Yes

T. zooplankton abundance

0.000

Yes

0.000

Yes

0.000

Yes

T. number of zooplankton spp

0.000

Yes

0.008

Yes

0.008

Yes

T. Rotifera abundance

0.000

Yes

0.000

Yes

0.313

No

T. number of Rotifer spp

0.001

Yes

0.000

Yes

0.070

No

T. Protozoa abundance

0.000

Yes

0.000

Yes

0.000

Yes

T. number of Protozoan spp.

0.002

Yes

0.492

No

1.000

No

T. Copepoda abundance

0.000

Yes

0.000

Yes

0.000

Yes

T. number Copepod spp

1.000

No

0.002

Yes

0.005

Yes

T. Cladocera abundance

0.337

No

0.000

Yes

0.588

No

T. number of Cladoceran spp

1.000

No

0.158

No

0.643

No