Table 2 Performance comparison of SoC estimation methods across different drive cycles.
Drive cycle | Methods | RMSE | MSE | MAPE | MAE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJDST | SFO-EKF16 | 0. 74 | 0.049 | 6.492 | 0. 418 |
HMDNN17 | 0. 625 | 0.053 | 8.318 | 0. 569 | |
IWHODL-BMS18 | 0. 596 | 0.092 | 6.31 | 0. 635 | |
WSO-HDLNN20 | 0. 699 | 0.055 | 5.32 | 0. 486 | |
CNN-BWGRU21 | 0. 422 | 0.030 | 6.730 | 0.586 | |
Proposed | 0.093 | 0.0086 | 2.14 | 0.281 | |
US06 | SFO-EKF16 | 0. 84 | 0.029 | 4.592 | 0. 618 |
HMDNN17 | 0. 675 | 0.053 | 7.318 | 0.549 | |
IWHODL-BMS18 | 0. 596 | 0.062 | 5.31 | 0. 735 | |
WSO-HDLNN20 | 0. 499 | 0.075 | 6.32 | 0. 986 | |
CNN-BWGRU21 | 0. 322 | 0.040 | 7.830 | 0.486 | |
Proposed | 0.0389 | 0.002 | 0.235 | 0.132 | |
FUDS | SFO-EKF16 | 0. 64 | 0.039 | 5. 592 | 0. 318 |
HMDNN17 | 0. 725 | 0.043 | 9.318 | 0. 49 | |
IWHODL-BMS18 | 0. 696 | 0.092 | 6.31 | 0. 935 | |
WSO-HDLNN20 | 0. 799 | 0.055 | 4.32 | 0. 886 | |
CNN-BWGRU21 | 0. 622 | 0.030 | 7. 30 | 0.386 | |
Proposed | 0.101 | 0.01 | 3.342 | 0.289 |